skip to main content
10.1145/3486011.3486547acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Program for the improvement of school coexistence, through LKT, in an elementary classroom in Ensenada, Mexico

Published:20 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research on school coexistence has had different objectives such as conceptualizing, identifying the dimensions that compose it, and evaluating its situation in different academic institutions. However, there are still different misconceptions about it, in which it is addressed mainly as school violence and not as coexistence. Likewise, and through the changes that society is facing, it would be favorable to begin to include the approach to coexistence through technological tools that facilitate, mainly for teachers, strategies to promote the improvement of school coexistence. That is why the objective of this work is to design a program, mediated in the Learning and Knowledge Technologies, to improve school coexistence in an elementary classroom in Ensenada, Mexico. To do this, the project methodology is divided into two phases: design and validation of the program, and its application and evaluation. The current results of the research are mainly theoretical, as a basis to begin with the design of the program.

References

  1. Concepción Chávez, Antonio Gómez, Azucena Ochoa, and Úrsula Zurita. 2016. La Política Nacional de Convivencia Escolar de México y su impacto en la vida en las escuelas de educación básica. Posgrado y Sociedad 14, 1, 1-13. Retrieved from https://revistas.uned.ac.cr/index.php/posgrado/article/view/1483/1561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. 2019. Promover prácticas escolares de participación entre los estudiantes para hacer de la escuela un espacio de convivencia libre de violencia. México, D.F. Retrieved from https://www.inee.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/P1C716.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel Bar-Tal. 2004. Nature, rationale, and effectiveness of education for coexistence. Journal of Social Issues 60, (May 2004), 253–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00110.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Secretaria de Educación Pública. 2017. Programa Nacional de Convivencia Escolar. Documento base. México, D. F.: SEP. Retrieved from https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/195743/DB_PNCE_260217.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alicia A. Chaparro, Noé Mora, and Viviana Medrano. 2019. Estudio de la implementación del Programa Nacional de Convivencia Escolar (PNCE) en una entidad federativa mexicana. Psicoperspectivas 18, 1 (March 2019), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol18-issue1-fulltext-1489Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ricardo Pérez, Paola Mercado, Mario Martínez, and Ernesto Mena. 2018. La sociedad del conocimiento y la sociedad de la información como la piedra angular en la innovación tecnológica educativa. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo 8, 16 (June 2018), 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/ride/v8n16/2007-7467-ride-8-16-00847.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ana D. Vargas. 2019. Educación para la convivencia y la cultura de la paz a través de las TAC: un estudio multicasos en el contexto bogotano. Master´s thesis. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, España. Retrieved from https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/667377Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Secretaría de Gobernación. 2014. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/constitucion/marzo_2014_constitucion.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Diario Oficial de la Federación [México]. 2019. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2019-2024. Retrieved from https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5565599&fecha=12/07/2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Diario Oficial de la Federación [México]. 2019. Ley General de Educación. Retrieved from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGE_300919.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alicia García-Holgado, Samuel Marcos-Pablos, and Francisco J. García-Peñalvo. 2020. Guidelines for performing Systematic Research Projects Reviews. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 6, 2, 136-144. DOI:10.9781/ijimai.2020.05.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Version 2.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Francisco Còrdoba, Rosario Del Rey, José A. Casas, and Rosario Ortega. 2016. Valoración del alumnado de primaria sobre convivencia escolar: El valor de la red de iguales. Psicoperspectivas 15, 2 (June 2016), 78-89. DOI:10.5027/PSICOPERSPECTIVAS-VOL15-ISSUE2-FULLTEXT-760Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cecilia Fierro-Evans and Patricia Carbajal-Padilla. 2019. Convivencia Escolar: Una revisión del concepto. Psicoperspectivas 18, 1 (March 2019), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol18-issue1-fulltext-1486Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ignacio Leyton-Leyton. 2020. Convivencia escolar en Latinoamérica: una revisión de literatura latinoamericana (2007-2017). Revista Colombiana de Educación 1, 80 (August 2020), 227-260. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num80-8219Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Matthew Koehler and Punya Mishra. 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9, 1. Retrieved from https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledgeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nancy E. García and Carlos A. Pérez. 2018. Creación de ambientes digitales de aprendizaje. Editorial digital UNID. Retrieved from https://books.google. com.co/books?id=4d5PDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summa ry_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Haydeé Parra, José López, Eliazar González, Leticia Moriel, Alma D. Vázquez, and Nora C. González. 2019. Las tecnologías del aprendizaje y del conocimiento (TAC) y la formación integral y humanista del médico. Investigación en educación médica 8, 31 (September 2019), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.22201/facmed.20075057e.2019.31.18128Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandra Ballestas. 2018. Estrategias pedagógicas para mejorar la convivencia escolar mediante las TIC. Cultura. Educación y Sociedad 9, 3 (December 2018), 343-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.9.3.2018.39Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cecilia Fierro, Ciseduc, S.C., Martha C. Jiménez, Paloma Ramírez, and Flavio Rojo. 2020. Guía de autodiagnóstico de convivencia en la escuela. Retrieved from https://convivenciaescolar.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cecilia Fierro and Bertha Fortoul. 2014. La gestión de los aprendizajes para la convivencia y para las disciplinas en las prácticas docentes, como objeto de estudio. In C. Perales, E. Arias, and M. Bazdresch. Desarrollo socioafectivo y convivencia escolar (pp. 61-89). Guadalajara, México: ITESO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Francisco J. García-Peñalvo. 2013. Education in knowledge society: A new PhD programme approach. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’13) (Salamanca, Spain, November 14-15, 2013), F.J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 575-577. DOI:10.1145/2536536.2536624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Francisco. J. García-Peñalvo. 2014. Formación en la sociedad del conocimiento, un programa de doctorado con una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Education in the Knowledge Society 15, 1, 4-9. DOI:10.14201/eks.11641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Alicia García-Holgado, Francisco. J García-Peñalvo, and María J. Rodríguez-Conde. 2015. Definition of a technological ecosystem for scientific knowledge management in a PhD Programme. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7-9, 2015), G.R. Alves and M.C. Felgueiras Eds. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 695-700. DOI:10.1145/2808580.2808686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Program for the improvement of school coexistence, through LKT, in an elementary classroom in Ensenada, Mexico
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)
              October 2021
              823 pages
              ISBN:9781450390668
              DOI:10.1145/3486011
              • Editors:
              • Marc Alier,
              • David Fonseca

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 December 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format