skip to main content
10.1145/3474880.3474890acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicebtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Creating Customer Loyalty in MUJI to Boost Customer Satisfaction with Service Quality – Take Switching Cost as the Moderator

Published:01 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aspects of psychological and physiological constructs have rarely been adopted in retail sale in non-specialized stores. This study investigated dimensions of psychological and physiological constructs among service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty, with switching cost serving as a moderator in the case of MUJI Co., Ltd. To examine the research model, this study allocated questionnaires and analyzed the collected data with regression analysis. The results indicated that service quality has a positive effect on customer satisfaction, customer satisfaction has a positive effect on customer loyalty, and service quality has a positive effect on customer loyalty in psychological and physiological constructs. Moreover, switching cost has a moderating effect between service quality and customer loyalty. These findings were relevant to non-specialized retail sales.

References

  1. Deloitte. 2015.Global powers of retailing. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Consumer-Business/gx-cb-global-powers-of-retailing.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilbert G. R. 2000. Measuring internal customer satisfaction. Managing Service Quality: an International journal, 10(3), 178-186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fogli L. 2006. What we need to know to develop strategies and tactics to improve service delivery. In L. Fogli (Ed.), Customer service delivery: Research and best practices (pp. 264-301). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Falk T., Hammerschmidt M., and Schepers J. J. 2010. The service quality-satisfaction link revisited: exploring asymmetries and dynamics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 288-302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sivakumar K., LiM., and Dong B. 2014. Service quality: the impact of frequency, timing, proximity, and sequence of failures and delights. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 41-58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. AdamskaM. and MinárováM. 2014. Role of learning organization in building consumer confidence. E+ M Ekonomie a Management, 17(1), 62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sriram S., Chintagunta P. K., and Manchanda P. 2015. Service quality variability and termination behavior. Management Science, 61(11), 2739-2759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kristensen K., MartensenA., and Gronholdt L. 2000. Customer satisfaction measurement at post Denmark: results of application of the European customer satisfaction index methodology. Total Quality Management, 11(7), 1007-1015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Blackwell R., DSouza C., Taghian M., Miniard P., and Engel J. 2006. Consumer behaviour: an Asia Pacific approach. South Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hellier P. K., Geursen G. M., Carr R. A., and Rickard J. A. 2003. Customer repurchase intention: a general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11), 1762-1800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lin R.J., Chen R.H.,and Kuan-Shun Chiu. 2010. Customer relationship management and innovation capability: an empirical study. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(1), 111-133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kotler P. and Keller K. L.2013. Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, New Jersy: Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. JonesM. A., TaylorV. A., and Reynolds K. E. 2014. The effect of requests for positive evaluations on customer satisfaction ratings. Psychology and Marketing, 31(3), 161-170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. KotlerP. 2003. Marketing Insights from A to Z: 80 concpects every manager needs to know: Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Assael H. 2004. Consumer behavior: a strategic approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fecikova I. 2004. An index method for measurement of customer satisfaction. The TQM Magazine, 16(1), 57-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Magid J. M., Cox A. D., and Cox D. S. 2006. Quantifying brand image: empirical evidence of trademark dilution. American Business Law Journal, 43(1), 1-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kim J., Morris J. D., and SwaitJ. 2008. Antecedents of true brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 99-117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Li D., and Chau P. Y. 2009. Acceptance of Internet-based services: a comparison of three models. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(3), 1-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Stokburger-Sauer N., Ratneshwar S., and Sen S. 2012. Drivers of consumer–brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 406-418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hansen J. D., Beitelspacher L. S., and Deitz G. D. 2013. Antecedents and consequences of consumers' comparative value assessments across the relationship life cycle. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 473-479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yeh C.H., Wang Y. S., and Yieh K. 2016. Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 245-257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Burnham T. A., Frels J. K., and Mahajan V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kotler P. 2003. Marketing Insights from A to Z: 80 concpects every manager needs to know: Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Caruana A. 2004. The impact of switching costs on customer loyalty: a study among corporate customers of mobile telephony. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(3), 256-268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Chang H. H., and Chen S. W. 2008. The impact of customer interface quality, satisfaction and switching costs on e-loyalty: Internet experience as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2927-2944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Blut M., Frennea C. M., Mittal V., and Mothersbaugh D. L. (2015). How procedural, financial and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(2), 226-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEBT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology
    June 2021
    174 pages
    ISBN:9781450389600
    DOI:10.1145/3474880

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format