skip to main content
10.1145/3448891.3448918acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobiquitousConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IAM – Interpolation and Aggregation on the Move: Collaborative Crowdsensing for Spatio-temporal Phenomena

Published:09 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crowdsensing allows citizens to contribute to the monitoring of their living environment using the sensors embedded in their mobile devices, e.g., smartphones. However, crowdsensing at scale involves significant communication, computation, and financial costs due to the dependence on cloud infrastructures for the analysis (e.g., interpolation and aggregation) of spatio-temporal data. This limits the adoption of crowdsensing by activists although sorely needed to inform our knowledge of the environment. As an alternative to the centralized analysis of crowdsensed observations, this paper introduces a fully distributed interpolation-mediated aggregation approach running on smartphones. To achieve so efficiently, we model the interpolation as a distributed tensor completion problem, and we introduce a lightweight aggregation strategy that anticipates the likelihood of future encounters according to the quality of the interpolation. Our approach thus shifts the centralized post-processing of crowdsensed data to distributed pre-processing on the move, based on opportunistic encounters of crowdsensors through state-of-the-art D2D networking. The evaluation using a dataset of quantitative environmental measurements collected from 550 crowdsensors over 1 year shows that our solution significantly reduces –and may even eliminate– the dependence on the cloud infrastructure, while it incurs a limited resource cost on end devices. Meanwhile, the overall data accuracy remains comparable to that of the centralized approach.

References

  1. Yanshuai Cao and David J Fleet. 2014. Generalized product of experts for automatic and principled fusion of Gaussian process predictions. In Modern Nonparametrics 3: Automating the Learning Pipeline workshop at NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Xu Chen, Lingjun Pu, Lin Gao, 2017. Exploiting massive D2D collaboration for energy-efficient mobile edge computing. IEEE Wireless Communications 24, 4 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yun Cheng, Xiaoxi He, Zimu Zhou, 2020. MapTransfer: Urban Air Quality Map Generation for Downscaled Sensor Deployments. In ACM International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Marc Peter Deisenroth and Jun Wei Ng. 2015. Distributed Gaussian processes. In International Conference on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ngoc Do, Ye Zhao, Cheng-Hsin Hsu, 2016. Crowdsourced mobile data transfer with delay bound. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 16, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yifan Du, Francoise Sailhan, and Valerie Issarny. 2020. Let opportunistic crowdsensors work together for resource-efficient, quality-aware observations. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Khalid Eldrandaly and Ahmed Abdelmouty. 2017. Spatio-temporal Interpolation: Current Practices and Future Prospects. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications 11 (06 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michele Girolami, Stefano Chessa, Gaia Adami, 2017. Sensing interpolation strategies for a mobile crowdsensing platform. In IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Paul Harris, AS Fotheringham, R Crespo, 2010. The use of geographically weighted regression for spatial prediction: an evaluation of models using simulated data sets. Mathematical Geosciences 42, 6 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Takamasa Higuchi, Hirozumi Yamaguchi, Teruo Higashino, 2014. A neighbor collaboration mechanism for mobile crowd sensing in opportunistic networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Valerie Issarny, Vivien Mallet, Kinh Nguyen, 2016. Dos and don’ts in mobile phone sensing middleware: Learning from a large-scale experiment. In ACM/IFIP International Middleware Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paulo Jesus, Carlos Baquero, and Paulo Sérgio Almeida. 2014. A survey of distributed data aggregation algorithms. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17, 1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Haiming Jin, Lu Su, Houping Xiao, 2018. Incentive mechanism for privacy-aware data aggregation in mobile crowd sensing systems. IEEE Transactions on Networking 26, 5 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Oskar Juhlin and Mattias Östergren. 2006. Time to meet face-to-face and device-to-device. In ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Goran Kalic, Iva Bojic, and Mario Kusek. 2012. Energy consumption in android phones when using wireless communication technologies. In IEEE International Convention MIPRO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu Kang, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2016. Data correlation based crowdsensing enhancement for environment monitoring. In IEEE International Conference on Communications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Xu Kang, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2017. Enhance the quality of crowdsensing for fine-grained urban environment monitoring via data correlation. MDPI Sensors 17, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Linghe Kong, Mingyuan Xia, Xiao-Yang Liu, 2013. Data loss and reconstruction in sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ioannis Koukoutsidis. 2017. Estimating spatial averages of environmental parameters based on mobile crowdsensing. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 14, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Youngki Lee, Younghyun Ju, Chulhong Min, 2012. Comon: Cooperative ambience monitoring platform with continuity and benefit awareness. In ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chenguang Liu, Jie Hua, and Christine Julien. 2019. Scents: Collaborative sensing in proximity iot networks. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Haitao Liu, Yew-Soon Ong, Xiaobo Shen, 2020. When Gaussian process meets big data: A review of scalable GPs. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Diego Mendez, Miguel Labrador, and Kandethody Ramachandran. 2013. Data interpolation for participatory sensing systems. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Budiman Minasny and Alex B McBratney. 2005. The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms. Geoderma 128, 3-4 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Orlando Ohashi and Luis Torgo. 2012. Spatial interpolation using multiple regression. In IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhaokun Qin and Yanmin Zhu. 2016. NoiseSense: A crowd sensing system for urban noise mapping service. In IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Carl Edward Rasmussen. 2003. Gaussian processes in machine learning. In Springer Summer School on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Francoise Sailhan, Valérie Issarny, and Otto Tavares-Nascimiento. 2017. Opportunistic multiparty calibration for robust participatory sensing. In IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jing Shi, Rui Zhang, Yunzhong Liu, 2010. Prisense: privacy-preserving data aggregation in people-centric urban sensing systems. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Muhammad Umer, Lars Kulik, and Egemen Tanin. 2010. Spatial interpolation in wireless sensor networks: localized algorithms for variogram modeling and Kriging. Geoinformatica 14, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Raphaël Ventura, Vivien Mallet, and Valérie Issarny. 2018. Assimilation of mobile phone measurements for noise mapping of a neighborhood. The journal of the acoustical society of America 144, 3 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiangtao Wang, Yasha Wang, Daqing Zhang, 2018. Learning-assisted optimization in mobile crowd sensing: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15, 1 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Leye Wang, Daqing Zhang, Yasha Wang, 2016. Sparse mobile crowdsensing: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 7 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Leye Wang, Daqing Zhang, Haoyi Xiong, 2016. ecoSense: Minimize participants’ total 3G data cost in mobile crowdsensing using opportunistic relays. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 47, 6(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu Xiao, Pieter Simoens, Padmanabhan Pillai, 2013. Lowering the barriers to large-scale mobile crowdsensing. In ACM International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Liwen Xu, Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D Lane, 2015. More with less: Lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensing. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Xi Xu, Rashid Ansari, Ashfaq Khokhar, 2015. Hierarchical data aggregation using compressive sensing (HDACS) in WSNs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 11, 3 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yanan Xu, Yanmin Zhu, and Zhaokun Qin. 2019. Urban noise mapping with a crowd sensing system. Wireless Networks 25, 5 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sijia Yang, Jiang Bian, Licheng Wang, 2018. EdgeSense: Edge-mediated spatial-temporal crowdsensing. IEEE Access 7(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, 2014. Diagnosing New York city’s noises with ubiquitous data. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobiQuitous '20: MobiQuitous 2020 - 17th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
    December 2020
    493 pages
    ISBN:9781450388405
    DOI:10.1145/3448891

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate26of87submissions,30%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format