ABSTRACT
Touchscreen has been increasingly used in human-computer interfaces in a variety of moving and vibration conditions, such as ships, cars, aircrafts and other transportation vehicles. However, little is known about touchscreen use in vibration conditions. This study investigated the effects of task precision requirement (locating precision ≥ 90%, ≥ 95% and ≥ 99%) on touchscreen use among varied vibration conditions (static, slight and moderate). Twenty participants participated in an experiment in which they performed drag and zoom touchscreen tasks. The results indicated that vibration and task precision requirement yielded significant effects on touchscreen performance. Vibration would impair touchscreen use performance in terms of reduced accuracy rate. As task precision requirement on locating precision increased, touchscreen performance became worse, as indicated by decreased accuracy rate. Task precision requirement was found to interact with vibration. The findings could help improve the design of usable touchscreen technology in vibration conditions.
- Burigat S, Chittaro L, Gabrielli S. Navigation techniques for small-screen devices: An evaluation on maps and web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2008;66(2):78-97.Google Scholar
- Kim H, Song H. Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion. Applied Ergonomics. 2014;45(3):789-798.Google Scholar
- Tao D, Yuan J, Liu S, Qu XD. Effects of button design characteristics on performance and perceptions of touchscreen use. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2018;64:59-68.Google Scholar
- Tao D, Wang T, Wang T, Zhang T, Zhang X, Qu X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;104:106147.Google Scholar
- Or C, Tao D. A 3-month randomized controlled pilot trial of a patient-centered, computer-based self-monitoring system for the care of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Journal of Medical Systems. 2016;40(4):13.Google Scholar
- Avsar H, Fischer JE, Rodden T. Future flight decks: impact of +Gz on touchscreen usability. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace: HCI-Aero2016. p. 1-8.Google Scholar
- Dodd S, Lancaster J, Miranda A, Grothe S, DeMers B, Rogers B. Touch screens on the flight deck: the impact of touch target size, spacing, touch technology and turbulence on pilot performance. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2014;58(1):6-10.Google Scholar
- Goode N, Lenne MG, Salmon P. The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation. Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):986-996.Google Scholar
- Salmon PM, Lenné MG, Triggs T, Goode N, Cornelissen M, Demczuk V. The effects of motion on in-vehicle touch screen system operation: a battle management system case study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2011;14(6):494-503.Google Scholar
- Baldus T, Patterson P. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment. Applied Ergonomics. 2008;39(6):671-677.Google Scholar
- Lin CJ, Liu CN, Chao CJ, Chen HJ. The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment. Ergonomics. 2010;53(4):478-490.Google Scholar
- Yau YJ, Chao CJ, Feng WY, Hwang SL. The effects of platform motion and target orientation on the performance of trackball manipulation. Ergonomics. 2011;54(8):745-754.Google Scholar
- Mitrouchev P, Chen J, Quaine F. Fingers’ biomechanical analysis with smartphone user tests. Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II: Springer; 2019. p. 52-61.Google Scholar
- Motti LG, Vigouroux N, Gorce P. Improving accessibility of tactile interaction for older users: lowering accuracy requirements to support drag-and-drop interaction. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;67:366-375.Google Scholar
- Nicolau H, Jorge J, editors. Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens.14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility; 2012; New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
- Tsai WC, Lee CF. A study on the icon feedback types of small touch screen for the elderly. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2009;5615:422–431.Google Scholar
- World Meteorological Organization. Manual on codes: International codes, vol. I.1, WMO 306. Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.Google Scholar
- Lu YZ, Qian YM, Qian X. Surgical nursing cooperation under different sea conditions on simulated hospital ship. Nursing Journal of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army. 2010;4:248-250.Google Scholar
- Coutts LV, Plant KL, Smith M, Bolton L, Parnell KJ, Arnold J, Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments. Ergonomics. 2019;62(2):286-304.Google Scholar
- Munafo J, Wade MG, Stergiou N, Stoffregen TA. Subjective reports and postural performance among older adult passengers on a sea voyage. Ecological Psychology. 2015;27(2):127-143.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Tablets, tabletops, and smartphones: cross-platform comparisons of children’s touchscreen interactions
ICMI '17: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal InteractionThe proliferation of smartphones and tablets has increased children’s access to and usage of touchscreen devices. Prior work on smartphones has shown that children’s touch interactions differ from adults’. However, larger screen devices like tablets ...
Drag-and-drop for older adults using touchscreen devices: effects of screen sizes and interaction techniques on accuracy
IHM '14: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-MachineThis study investigates the accuracy of drag-and-drop interaction for older adults by analyzing the number of supplementary attempts for positioning a target during the execution of tactile puzzle games on two different screen sizes, tablet and ...
Effect of elastic touchscreen and input devices with different softness on user task performance and subjective satisfaction
This study explored the relationship between the softness of two output displays (glass and elastic surfaces) and three direct input devices (fingertip and two types of styli, with acrylic and rubber tips) in terms of user task performance and ...
Comments