skip to main content
10.1145/3446922.3446933acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebeeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touchscreen Operations in Vibration Conditions: Task Precision Requirement Matters

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Touchscreen has been increasingly used in human-computer interfaces in a variety of moving and vibration conditions, such as ships, cars, aircrafts and other transportation vehicles. However, little is known about touchscreen use in vibration conditions. This study investigated the effects of task precision requirement (locating precision ≥ 90%, ≥ 95% and ≥ 99%) on touchscreen use among varied vibration conditions (static, slight and moderate). Twenty participants participated in an experiment in which they performed drag and zoom touchscreen tasks. The results indicated that vibration and task precision requirement yielded significant effects on touchscreen performance. Vibration would impair touchscreen use performance in terms of reduced accuracy rate. As task precision requirement on locating precision increased, touchscreen performance became worse, as indicated by decreased accuracy rate. Task precision requirement was found to interact with vibration. The findings could help improve the design of usable touchscreen technology in vibration conditions.

References

  1. Burigat S, Chittaro L, Gabrielli S. Navigation techniques for small-screen devices: An evaluation on maps and web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2008;66(2):78-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim H, Song H. Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion. Applied Ergonomics. 2014;45(3):789-798.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tao D, Yuan J, Liu S, Qu XD. Effects of button design characteristics on performance and perceptions of touchscreen use. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2018;64:59-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tao D, Wang T, Wang T, Zhang T, Zhang X, Qu X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;104:106147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Or C, Tao D. A 3-month randomized controlled pilot trial of a patient-centered, computer-based self-monitoring system for the care of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Journal of Medical Systems. 2016;40(4):13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Avsar H, Fischer JE, Rodden T. Future flight decks: impact of +Gz on touchscreen usability. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace: HCI-Aero2016. p. 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodd S, Lancaster J, Miranda A, Grothe S, DeMers B, Rogers B. Touch screens on the flight deck: the impact of touch target size, spacing, touch technology and turbulence on pilot performance. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2014;58(1):6-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Goode N, Lenne MG, Salmon P. The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation. Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):986-996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Salmon PM, Lenné MG, Triggs T, Goode N, Cornelissen M, Demczuk V. The effects of motion on in-vehicle touch screen system operation: a battle management system case study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2011;14(6):494-503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldus T, Patterson P. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment. Applied Ergonomics. 2008;39(6):671-677.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin CJ, Liu CN, Chao CJ, Chen HJ. The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment. Ergonomics. 2010;53(4):478-490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yau YJ, Chao CJ, Feng WY, Hwang SL. The effects of platform motion and target orientation on the performance of trackball manipulation. Ergonomics. 2011;54(8):745-754.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitrouchev P, Chen J, Quaine F. Fingers’ biomechanical analysis with smartphone user tests. Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II: Springer; 2019. p. 52-61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Motti LG, Vigouroux N, Gorce P. Improving accessibility of tactile interaction for older users: lowering accuracy requirements to support drag-and-drop interaction. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;67:366-375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicolau H, Jorge J, editors. Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens.14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility; 2012; New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsai WC, Lee CF. A study on the icon feedback types of small touch screen for the elderly. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2009;5615:422–431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. World Meteorological Organization. Manual on codes: International codes, vol. I.1, WMO 306. Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu YZ, Qian YM, Qian X. Surgical nursing cooperation under different sea conditions on simulated hospital ship. Nursing Journal of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army. 2010;4:248-250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Coutts LV, Plant KL, Smith M, Bolton L, Parnell KJ, Arnold J, Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments. Ergonomics. 2019;62(2):286-304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Munafo J, Wade MG, Stergiou N, Stoffregen TA. Subjective reports and postural performance among older adult passengers on a sea voyage. Ecological Psychology. 2015;27(2):127-143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBEE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on E-Business and E-commerce Engineering
    December 2020
    79 pages
    ISBN:9781450388924
    DOI:10.1145/3446922

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format