m.c. schraefel
ABSTRACT
While increasing numbers of HCI Designers or Researchers design tools for health and wellbeing, few have a background in human anatomy and physiology. Inbodied Interaction 101 provides a fundamental orientation to human anatomy and physiology specifically framed for HCI designers, researchers and engineers that students will be able to use immediately to inform their own designs. The models offer practical orientation for any designer interested in developing tools to support human performance, health and wellbeing, both physically, socially and cognitively. It will help anyone whose work touches the human body – from mixed reality to behaviour mediation, all of which are mediated by the state of the body. Students will learn fundamental physiological parameters within our anatomy to support these states. Students will also test these approaches in class, to see how they can be used for both evaluation and design of innovative, inbodied-aligned designs.
- Josh Andres, m.c. schraefel, Aaron Tabor, and Eric B. Hekler. 2019. The Body As Starting Point: Applying Inside Body Knowledge for Inbodied Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, W32:1-W32:8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299023Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jay K, Brandt M, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Berthelsen KG, Schraefel M, Sjøgaard G, and Andersen LL. 2016. Ten weeks of physical-cognitive-mindfulness training reduces fear-avoidance beliefs about work-related activity: Randomized controlled trial. Medicine (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000003945Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth Murnane. 2020. Inbodied interaction design example: chronobiology-friendly technology. interactions 27, 2 (February 2020), 54–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3380938Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Schraefel, Scott Bateman, Adrian Friday, and Josh Andres. 2019. The uncomfortable workshop: exploring discomfort design for wellbeing and sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers - UbiComp/ISWC ’19, ACM Press, London, United Kingdom, 1083–1086. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3347767Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel. 2015. Mobile Being: How Inbodied & Embodied Practice May Inform Mobile Cognition. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI ’15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 974–985. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794322Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel. 2019. In5: A Model for Inbodied Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, LBW1818:1-LBW1818:6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312977Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel. 2020. Introduction. interactions 27, 2 (February 2020), 32–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3380811Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel, Elise van den Hoven, and Josh Andres. 2018. The Body As Starting Point: Exploring Inside and Around Body Boundaries for Body-Centric Computing Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, W02:1-W02:7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170638Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel, Aaron Tabor, and Josh Andres. 2020. Toward insourcing-measurement in inbodied interaction design. interactions 27, 2 (February 2020), 56–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3381340Google ScholarDigital Library
- m.c. schraefel, Aaron Tabor, and Elizabeth Murnane. 2020. Discomfort design. interactions 27, 2 (February 2020), 40–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3381875Google ScholarDigital Library
- A Cyborg Manifesto. Retrieved December 30, 2020 from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/donna-harroway-a-cyborg-manifesto-1Google Scholar
- 2019 SUMMER SCHOOL on Inbodied Interaction – Wellthlab. Retrieved October 15, 2019 from https://wellthlab.soton.ac.uk/in5-2019/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Inbodied Interaction 101: A First Course in Practical Anatomy & Physiology for HCI Designers, Researchers and Engineers
Recommendations
Inbodied Interaction 102: Exploring Neuro-Physio Pathways for Self-Tuning
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn Inbodied Interaction 101, we considered the Physiology and Anatomy of the body via three associated interactions that reflect an inbodied state: 1. inbodied adaptation in response to the in5 and C4 over Time and Context in order to maintain 2. ...
Future InBodied: A Framework for Inbodied Interaction Design
TEI '20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionInbodied interaction is an emerging area in HCI that aligns how the body performs internally with our designs to support and optimise human performance. Inbodied Interaction therefore relies on knowledge of our physiology/neurology/kinesiology etc, to ...
The Body as Starting Point: Applying Inside Body Knowledge for Inbodied Design
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInbodied design is an emerging area in HCI that focuses on using knowledge of the body's internal systems and processes to better inform em-bodied and circum-bodied design spaces. The current challenge in developing an inbodied approach to HCI research/...
Comments