skip to main content
10.1145/3409891.3409900acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmecgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

JIT Adoption and Corporate Innovation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

JIT (Just-in-time), as a classical operation management system, has made significant contributions to the manufacturing and financial performance of enterprises. Moreover, the adoption of JIT is conducive to the increase of retained earnings of enterprises and becomes a reservoir and buffer pool for corporate innovation. Besides, we employ a double-fixed panel-date regression model to analyze the database of 9051 observations to find the relationship between JIT adoption and corporate innovation. Then we divide patents into three types to study the impact of JIT on the type of corporate innovation. Moreover, we find that JIT adoption promotes the corporate innovation investment and innovation output. When we use different types of patent to test our hypothesis, this finding also holds. Then the sample has been narrowed and the results remain the same. JIT adoption is beneficial to the innovation of enterprises Also, we find an exciting event that JIT adoption influences the number of short-term patent grants. Our research provides some convincing evidence to support companies in implementing JIT.

References

  1. I. Tahir, H. Faizul, and B. M. K. S, "Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan," Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 203, pp. 24--37, 2018. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Balakrishnan, T. J. Linsmeier, and M. Venkatachalam, "Financial Benefits from JIT Adoption: Effects of Customer Concentration and Cost Structure," Account. Rev., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 183--205, 1998.DOI= https://www.jstor.org/stable/248445Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Nakamura, S. Sakakibara, and S. R, "Adoption of just-in-time manufacturing methods at US- and Japanese-owned plants: some empirical evidence," EEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 230--240, 1998. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1109/17.704245Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Womack, James P.. "The Psychology of Lean Production." Applied Psychology 45.2(1996):119--122 DOI= https://doi.org/ 10.1080/026999496378684Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. B. H. HALL, "The Financing of Research and Development," Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35--51, 2002.DOI= https://www.jstor.org/stable/23606869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Graham and B. Wilkinson, "Someone To Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline And The Just-In-Time Labour Process," Sociology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 271--89, 1992.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026002009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. A. Inman and S. Mehra, "Financial Justification of JIT Implementation" Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 32--39, 1993. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579310027734Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. R. Kinney and W. F. Wempe, "Further Evidence on the Extent and Origins of JIT"s Profitability Effects," Account. Rev., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 203--225, 2002. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.1.203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. F. Groebner and C. Mike Merz, "The Impact of Implementing JIT on Employees' Job Attitudes," Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26--37, 1994.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579410049289Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Delbridge, P. Turnbull, and B. Wilkinson, "Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes," New Technol. Work Employ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97--106, 2007.DOI=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.1992.tb00024.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Bortolotti, P. Danese, and P. Romano, "Assessing the impact of just-in-time on operational performance at varying degrees of repetitiveness," Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1117--1130, 2013.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.678403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. L. CALLEN, M. MOREL, and C. FADER, "Productivity Measurement and the Relationship between Plant Performance and JIT Intensity," Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 271--309, 2004. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1506/GU78-6EDM-1G36-4YBQGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. B. Block, E. Beardsworth, and C. Chan, "An evolving technology-transfer system in an R&D consortium: The EPRI approach," J. Financ. Econ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 255--276, 1990. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02377653Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. C. Eberhart and A. Siddique, "The Long-Term Performance of Corporate Bonds (and Stocks) Following Seasoned Equity Offerings," Rev. Financ. Stud., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1385--1406, 2002. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.5.1385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. R. Brown, G. Martinsson, and B. C. Petersen, "Do financing constraints matter for R&D?," Finance, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1517--1549, 2014.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. R. Brown and I. V. Floros, "Access to Private Equity and Real Firm Activity: Evidence from PIPEs," J. Corp. Finance, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 151--165, 2012.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.11.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Czarnitzki and K. Kraft, "Innovation indicators and corporate credit ratings: evidence from German firms," Econ. Lett., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 377--384, 2004.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.09.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. L. Deng, Y. Wu, and M. Li, "Research on Core Technology Development Patterns of Corporate Independent Brand Innovation," in Proceedings of the 2012 3rd International Conference on E-Business and E-Government - Volume 05, 2012. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2012.1497Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Wright, S. P. Ferris, A. Sarin, and V. Awasthi, "Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder, and Institutional Equity Ownership on Firm Risk Taking," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 441--463, 1996.DOI= https://www.jstor.org/stable/256787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. A. Schumpeter, Entrepreneurship, Technological Innovation and Economic. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Y. Dong, C. R. Carter, and M. E. Dresner, "JIT Purchasing and Performance: An Exploratory Analysis of Buyer and Supplier Perspectives," J. Oper. Manag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 471--483, 2001. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00066-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Hirshleifer, P.-H. Hsu, and D. Li, "Innovative efficiency and stock returns," J. Financ. Econ., vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 632--654, 2013. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. D. Guo, "Innovation Input, Innovation Output and Firm Competitiveness: An Analysis of China Pharmaceutical Industry at Firm Level," 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. Holmström, "Agency Costs and Innovation," J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 305--327, 1989. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. JIT Adoption and Corporate Innovation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICMECG '20: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government
        July 2020
        130 pages
        ISBN:9781450377478
        DOI:10.1145/3409891

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 August 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader