skip to main content
10.1145/3406324.3410722acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Investigating Smartphones and AR Glasses for Pedestrian Navigation and their Effects in Spatial Knowledge Acquisition

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Abstract–Moving in a complex and changing environment (rapid expansion of cities, creation of new transport lines, etc.) requires more and more capacity for path determination and following. This paper presents a protocol of a user study under progress. Its aim is to compare an application on AR Glasses and Smartphone to help pedestrians to memorize path following recommended landmarks.

References

  1. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. J. Usability Studies 4, 3 (5 2009), 114–123. http://dl.acm.org.ins2i.bib.cnrs.fr/citation.cfm?id=2835587.2835589Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Joseph L Gabbard, J Edward Swan, and Deborah Hix. 2006. The effects of text drawing styles, background textures, and natural lighting on text legibility in outdoor augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 15, 1(2006), 16–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aaron L. Gardony, Tad T. Brunyé, Caroline R. Mahoney, and Holly A. Taylor. 2013. How Navigational Aids Impair Spatial Memory: Evidence for Divided Attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation 13, 4 (2013), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2013.792821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Haosheng Huang, Manuela Schmidt, and Georg Gartner. 2012. Spatial Knowledge Acquisition with Mobile Maps, Augmented Reality and Voice in the Context of GPS-based Pedestrian Navigation: Results from a Field Test. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 39, 2 (2012), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1559/15230406392107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Toru Ishikawa, Hiromichi Fujiwara, Osamu Imai, and Atsuyuki Okabe. 2008. Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28, 1 (2008), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kyoko Konishi and Véronique D. Bohbot. 2013. Spatial navigational strategies correlate with gray matter in the hippocampus of healthy older adults tested in a virtual maze. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 5, FEB (2013), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christian Kray, Katri Laakso, Christian Elting, and Volker Coors. 2003. Presenting route instructions on mobile devices. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI (2003), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044531-1/50445-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eleanor A. Maguire, David G. Gadian, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Catriona D. Good, John Ashburner, Richard S.J. Frackowiak, and Christopher D. Frith. 2000. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. PNAS USA 97, 8 (2000), 4398–4403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chiara Meneghetti, Clara Zancada-menéndez, Patricia Sampedro-piquero, Laudino Lopez, Massimiliano Martinelli, Lucia Ronconi, and Barbara Rossi. 2016. Mental representations derived from navigation : The role of visuo-spatial abilities and working memory. Learning and Individual Diff. 49 (2016), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Alexandra Millonig and Katja Schechtner. 2007. Developing landmark-based pedestrian-navigation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 8, 1(2007), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.889439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel R Montello. 2005. Navigation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, A. Miyake P. Shah (Ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press, 257–294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Avi Parush, Shir Ahuvia, and Ido Erev. 2007. Degradation in Spatial Knowledge Acquisition When Using Automatic Navigation Systems. Knowledge Acquisition(2007), 238–254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Karl Rehrl, Elisabeth Häusler, Sven Leitinger, and Daniel Bell. 2014. Pedestrian navigation with augmented reality, voice and digital map: final results from an in situ field study assessing performance and user experience. J. Locat. Based Serv. 8, 2 (2014), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2014.946975Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ian T Ruginski, Sarah H Creem-regehr, Jeanine K Stefanucci, and Elizabeth Cashdan. 2019. GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 64, May (2019), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rufat Rzayev, Paweł W Woźniak, Tilman Dingler, and Niels Henze. 2018. Reading on smart glasses: The effect of text position, presentation type and walking. In CHI 2018, ACM. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alexander W Siegel and Sheldon H White. 1975. Advances in Child Development and Behavior Volume 10. Adv. Child. Dev. Behav. 10 (1975), 9–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60007-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Barbara Tversky. 1992. Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 23, 2 (1992), 131–138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Denis Wood. 1992. How Maps Work. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 29, 3-4 (10 1992), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/H314-J2NG-Q543-5633Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    October 2020
    248 pages
    ISBN:9781450380522
    DOI:10.1145/3406324

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 February 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format