skip to main content
10.1145/3404512.3404516acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mining High Utility Co-location Patterns Using the Maximum Clique and the Subsume Index

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mining high utility co-location patterns (HUCP) is a promising technique in spatial data mining because it treats different features with different levels of importance. Existing HUCP mining (HUCPM) algorithms are based on row instances and table instances, leading to high computational cost. To overcome this problem, an HUCPM algorithm based on the subsume index (HUCPM-SI) is developed using a typical high utility itemset mining model. Maximal cliques are first discovered, enabling the spatial database to be transformed into a clique transaction database. The subsume index is then used to mine HUCPs. Tests conducted on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate the advantages of the HUCPM-SI algorithm.

References

  1. Andrzejewski, W., and Boinski, P. 2019. Parallel approach to incremental co-location pattern mining. Inform. Sciences 496 (2019)485--505Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Han, J., Pei, J., Yin, Y., and Mao, R. 2004. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach. Data Min Knowl. Discov. 8, 1 (2004) 53--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Huang, Y., Shekhar, S., and Xiong, H. 2004. Discovering colocation patterns from spatial data sets: a general approach. IEEE T. Knowl. Data En. 16, 12 (2004) 1472--1485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Huang, Y., Zhang, L., and Yu, P. 2005. Can we apply projection based frequent pattern mining paradigm to spatial co-location mining? In Proceedings of the 9th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD '05). Springer, 719--725.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim, S. K., Kim, Y., and Kim, U. 2011. Maximal cliques generating algorithm for spatial co-location pattern mining. In Proceedings of the FTRA International Conference on Secure and Trust Computing, Data Management, and Application (STA'11). Springer, 241--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu, Y., Liao, W.-K., and Choudhary, A. N. 2005. A two-phase algorithm for fast discovery of high utility itemsets. In Proceedings of the 9th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD '05). Springer, 689--695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Son, L. H., Lanzi, P. L., Cuong, B. C. and Hung, H. A. 2012. Data mining in GIS: a novel context-based fuzzy geographically weighted clustering algorithm. Intl. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. 2, 3 (2012) 235--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Song, W., Yang, B., and Xu, Z. 2008. Index-BitTableFI: An improved algorithm for mining frequent itemsets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 21, 6 (2008) 507--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Song, W., Zhang, Z., and Li, J. 2016. A high utility itemset mining algorithm based on subsume index. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 49, 1 (2016) 315--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wang, L., Jiang, W., Chen, H., and Fang Y. 2017. Efficiently mining high utility co-location patterns from spatial data sets with instance-specific utilities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA'17). Springer, 458--474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, S., and Yuan, H. 2014. Spatial data mining: a perspective of big data. Int. J. Data Warehous. 10, 4 (2014) 50--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wang, X., Wang, L., Lu, J., and Zhou, L. 2016. Effectively updating high utility co-location patterns in evolving spatial databases. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM'16). Springer, 67--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang, S., Wang, L., Bao, X., and Lu, J. 2015. A framework for mining spatial high utility co-location patterns. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD '15). IEEE, 595--601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yoo, J. S., and Bow, M. 2012. Mining spatial colocation patterns: a different framework. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 24, 1 (2012) 159--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mining High Utility Co-location Patterns Using the Maximum Clique and the Subsume Index

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BDE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Big Data Engineering
      May 2020
      146 pages
      ISBN:9781450377225
      DOI:10.1145/3404512

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader