skip to main content
10.1145/3396743.3396760acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of Weibull Distribution on Supplier Comparison using Lower Process Capability Index: The Examples Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to study the effect of Weibull distribution on supplier comparison via 3 examples obtained from the simulated data and real data. The study compares two supplier using lower process capability index (Cpl). To understand the effect, each example is divided into 3 cases. According to Weibull distributed process, the examples show that the result of supplier comparison is sensitive to process's shape. The symmetric process produces that the p-values of supplier comparison are not different in all cases. As a result, the comparing results are the same. On the other hand, there is a possibly misleading result in case of the right-skewed process. Although the methods of handling non-normal Cpl are applied to compare suppliers, the p-values are different and depend on skewness and kurtosis. So, the comparing results are not the same.

References

  1. Montogery, D.C. 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control, (6th edition). John Weiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dodson, B. 2006. The Weibull Analysis Handbook. 2nd edition. American Society for Quality, Quality Press, Milwaukee, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pearn, W.L. and Wu, C.H. 2013.Supplier selection critical decision values for processes with multiple independent lines. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 29, 6, 899--909. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chou, Y.M. 1994. Selecting a better supplier by testing process capability indices. Qual. Eng. 6, 3, 427--438. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119408918738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hubele, N.F., Berrado, A., and Gel, E.S. 2005. A Wald test for comparing multiple capability indices. J. Qual. Technol. 37, 4, 304--307. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2005.11980333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pearn, W.L., Hung, H.N., and Cheng, Y.C. 2009. Supplier selection for one-side processes with unequal sample sizes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195, 381--393. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Manomat. S. and Sudasna-na-Ayudthya, P. 2009. The method for selecting multiple suppliers using one-sided specification limit's capability index. KKU Engineering Journal. 36, 4, 313--321. (In Thai)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pearn, W. L., Hung, H. N., Chuang Y. S., and Su, R. H. 2011. An effective powerful test for one-sided supplier selection problem. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81, 10, 1313--1331, DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.483475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wu, C.C., Horng Shiau, J.J., Pearn, W.L., and Hung, H.N. 2016. A Bayesian approach for group supplier selections based on the popular process-capability-index Cpk. Qual. Technol. Quant. M.13, 2, 109--123, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2016.1169674.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Pearn, W.L. and Wu, C. H. 2013. Supplier Selection for Multiple-Characteristics Processes with One-Sided Specifications, Qual. Technol. Quant. M. 10, 1, 133--139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2013. 11673312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pearn W. L., Wu, C.H., and Chuang, C.C. 2016. An effective powerful test for one-sided supplier selection problem with multiple independent characteristics. Qual. Technol. Quant. M. 13, 2, 182--196, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2016.1169689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lan, Y.J and Lin, C.J. 2017. An efficient subset selection method for supplier selection under multiple quality characteristics. Qual. Technol. Quant. M. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2017.1389145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kane, V.E. 1986. Process capability indices. J. Qual. Technol. 18, 41--52. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1986.11978984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Clement, J.A. 1989. Process capability calculations for non-normal distributions. Quality Progress. 22, 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO/TR 22514-4:2007. 2007. Statistical methods in process management --- Capability and performance --- Part 4: Process capability estimates and performance measures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, N.L. 1949. System of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika. 36, 149--176. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jiang, R. and Murthy, D.N.P. 2011. A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 96, 1619--1626. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Proschan, F. 1963. Theoretical explanation of observed decreasing failure rate, Technometrics. 15, 375--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Weibull Distribution on Supplier Comparison using Lower Process Capability Index: The Examples Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MSIE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
      April 2020
      341 pages
      ISBN:9781450377065
      DOI:10.1145/3396743

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader