ABSTRACT
The painting Salvator Mundi is attributed to Leonardo da Vinci and depicts Jesus holding a transparent orb. The authors study the optical accuracy of the fine illumination effects in this painting using inverse rendering. Their experimental results provide plausible explanations for the strange glow inside the orb, the anomalies on the orb and the mysterious three white spots, supporting the optical accuracy of the orb's rendering down to its fine-grain details.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- N. Freeman, "Leonardo da Vinci's 'Salvator Mundi' Sells for $450.3 M. at Christie's in New York," ARTNEWS, 15 November 2017.Google Scholar
- B. Lewis, The Last Leonardo: The Secret Lives of the World's Most Expensive Painting (New York: Ballantine, 2019).Google Scholar
- W. Isaacson, Leonardo da Vinci (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017).Google Scholar
- Isaacson [3].Google Scholar
- M. Kemp, "Sight and Salvation," Nature 479 (2011) pp. 174--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Noest and M. Kemp, "Art History: No Refraction in Leonardo's Orb," Nature 480 (2011) p. 457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Hope, "A Peece of Christ," London Review of Books 42, No. 1 (2020).Google Scholar
- A. Criminisi, M. Kemp and A. Zisserman, "Bringing Pictorial Space to Life: Computer Techniques for the Analysis of Paintings," in Digital Art History: A Subject in Transition (Bristol, U.K.: Intellect Books, 2005) pp. 77--99.Google Scholar
- D. Hockney and C. Falco, "Optical Insights Into Renaissance Art," Optics & Photonics News 11, No. 7, 52--59 (2000).Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Stork, "Optics and Realism in Renaissance Art," Scientific American 291, No. 6, 76--83 (2004).Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Stork, "Computer Vision and Computer Graphics Analysis of Paintings and Drawings: An Introduction to the Literature," in Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Xiaoyi Jiang and Nicolai Petkov, eds. (Münster: Springer, 2009) pp. 9--24.Google Scholar
- S. Boivin and A. Gagalowicz, "Inverse Rendering from a Single Image," Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision (2002) pp. 268--277.Google Scholar
- S. Marschner and D. Greenberg, "Inverse Lighting for Photography," Color and Imaging Conference 1 (1997) pp. 262--265.Google Scholar
- R. Ramamoorthi and P. Hanrahan, "A Signal-Processing Framework for Inverse Rendering," SIGGRAPH (2001) pp. 117--128.Google Scholar
- Y. Yu et al., "Inverse Global Illumination: Recovering Reflectance Models of Real Scenes from Photographs," SIGGRAPH (1999) pp. 215--224.Google Scholar
- Leonardo also used a sfomato technique, which blurs some edges in a painting, such as is seen in the jawline of Jesus in Salvator Mundi. However, the sfomato has not been used with the orb.Google Scholar
- S. Grundy, "The Distortion of Leonardo da Vinci: How Experts Missed the Significant Anamorphic Design of Salvator Mundi," South African Journal of Art History 33, No. 4, 47--56 (2018).Google Scholar
- M. Zhanhang Liang, M. Goodrich and S. Zhao, "On the Optical Accuracy of the Salvator Mundi," arXiv:1912.03416 (2019).Google Scholar
- W. Jakob, Mitsuba 0.5, physically based rendering software tool, 2010: http://www.mitsuba-renderer.org/index_old.html (accessed April 2020).Google Scholar
- M. Pharr, W. Jakob and G. Humphreys, Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation (Cambridge, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2016).Google Scholar
- Because some experts disagree about whether this painting should be attributed to Leonardo, we use "Leonardo?" when referring to the artist who painted Salvator Mundi.Google Scholar
- Liang, Goodrich and Zhao [18].Google Scholar
- Leonardo da Vinci, Codex Atlanticus, c. 1513--15. f. 750r [277r.a].Google Scholar
- Noest and Kemp [6].Google Scholar
- Hope [7].Google Scholar
- Criminisi, Kemp and Zisserman [8].Google Scholar
Comments