ABSTRACT
How do various forms of contestation and agonism in collective social contexts challenge and transform Participatory Design (PD)? Under what conditions does agonism lead to productive outcomes, expand participation and social inclusion? In this paper, we highlight key insights and issues emerging from three case studies, where design practitioners engaged in PD projects for urban and cultural transformation in New York City and Cambridge. Wide-ranging interviews and participatory workshops reveal how PD is transformed by different “ecologies” inherent in the socio-cultural conditions, power relations, design constraints, and intrinsic values of practitioners grappling with contestation and seeking to engage agonistic pluralism.
- Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. In Proceeding of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),7: 167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52 (2), 163–174.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liam J. Bannon and Pelle Ehn. 2013. Design Matters in Participatory Design. In J. Simonsen and T. Robertson (Eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chantal Mouffe. 1999. Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? Social Research,66 (3), 745-758. Google Scholar
- Chantal Mouffe. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. Verso Books.Google Scholar
- Seyla Benhabib. 1996. Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Democracy and Difference, Benhabib, Seyla, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Carl DiSalvo. 2010. Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. In: Proceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference, 7–9 July, Montreal University, Montreal.Google Scholar
- Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chantal Mouffe. 2011. On the Political. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chantal Mouffe. 2007. Artistic activism and agonistic spaces. Art & Research 1, no. 2, 1-5.Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn and Morten Kyng. 1987. The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design, in Gro Bjerknes, Pelle Ehn and Morten Kyng (Eds.) Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge, Brookville, VT: Avebury.Google Scholar
- Kristen Nygaard. 1979. The Iron and Metal Project: Trade Union Participation, In Å. Sandberg (ed.): Computers Dividing Man and Work – Recent Scandinavian Research on Planning and Computers from a Trade Union Perspective. Swedish Center for Working Life, Demos Project report no. 13, Utbildningsproduktion, Malmø, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn and Ake Sandberg. 1979. Management Control and Wage Earner Power (Foretagsstyrning och Lontagarmakt). Falkoping: Prisma.Google Scholar
- Morten Kyng and Lars Mathiassen. 1982. Systems development and trade union activities. In Bjørn-Andersen, N. (Ed.), Information society, for richer, for poorer, 247-260. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North- Holland.Google Scholar
- Andrew Clement and Peter Van den Besselaar. 1993. A Retrospective look at PD Projects. Communications of the ACM, 36(6):29-37.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, John Kammersgaard, Morten Kyng, and Yngve Sundblad. 1987. A Utopian experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers, in Gro Bjerknes, Pelle Ehn and Morten Kyng (Eds.) Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge, Brookville, VT: Avebury. Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Dan Sjögren, and Yngve Sundblad. 2000. Co-operative Design—perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT Design Model’. In Proceedings of NordiCHI (Vol. 2000, pp. 22-24).Google Scholar
- Jesper Simonsen and Finn Kensing. 1997. Using ethnography in contextual design. Communications of the ACM,40, 7, 82-88.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liesbeth Huybrechts, Henric Benesch, and Jon Geib. 2017. Institutioning: Participatory design, co-design and the public realm. CoDesign 13, no. 3, 148-159.Google Scholar
- Per-Anders Hillgren, Anna Seravalli, and Mette Agger Eriksen. 2016. Counter-hegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal; 9 (2): 89-99.Google Scholar
- Peter Munthe-Kaas. 2015. Agonism and co-design of urban spaces." Urban Research & Practice 8, no. 2, 218-237.Google Scholar
- Gavin Parker, Tessa Lynn, and Matthew Wargent. 2017. Contestation and conservatism in neighbourhood planning in England: reconciling agonism and collaboration? Planning Theory & Practice 18, no. 3, 446-465.Google Scholar
- Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements, CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 8:2-3, 127-144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paulo Freire. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
- Yoland Wadsworth. 1998. What is participatory action research? Paper 2, Action Research International. Institute of Workplace Research, Learning and Development, Southern Cross University Press.Google Scholar
- Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby (Eds.). 2007. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge, London; New York.Google Scholar
- Henri Lefebvre. 1968. Le droit à la ville Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
- Henri Lefebvre. 1996. The right to the city, in Kofman, Eleonore; Lebas, Elizabeth, Writings on cities, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 158.Google Scholar
- Mark Purcell. 2002. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, Special Issue: Social Transformation, Citizenship, and the Right to the City. Springer. 58 (2–3): 99–108.Google Scholar
- David Harvey. 2008. The right to the city. New Left Review. New Left Review. II (53): 23–40.Google Scholar
- Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Citizen's Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Joe Shaw and Mark Graham. 2017. An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode. Wiley Publications.Google Scholar
- Eugene Pleasants Odum and Gary W. Barrett. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Peter Finke. 2013. A Brief Outline of Evolutionary Cultural Ecology in Traditions of Systems Theory: Major Figures and Contemporary Developments, ed. Darrell P. Arnold, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Paul Robbins. 2012. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Janet Vertesi. 2014. Seamful Spaces: Heterogeneous Infrastructures in Interaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 264–284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gloria Mark, Kalle Lyytinen, and Mark Bergman. 2007. Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, no. 11, 34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilbert W. Fairholm. 1993. Organizational power politics: tactics in organizational leadership. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. Google Scholar
- Jeffery Pfeffer. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman Pub.Google Scholar
- NYC Cultural Affairs. 2017. About the Cultural Plan. CreateNYC. Last accessed on September 5, 2019. https://createnyc.cityofnewyork.us/the-cultural-plan/main/Google Scholar
- Kenneth Pietrobono. 2017. How NYC's New Cultural Plan and the “People's Plan” Can Work in Tandem. Hyperallergic. Last accessed on April 10, 2019. https://hyperallergic.com/392512/how-nycs-new-cultural-plan-and-the-peoples-plan-can-work-together/Google Scholar
- Aarian Marshall. 2018. “Still Smarting from Uber, Cities Wise up About Scooter Data”. Wired. Last accessed on December 17, 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/cities-scooter-data-remix-uber-lyft/Google Scholar
- Russ Lopez, Richard Campbell, and James Jennings. 2008. The Boston Schoolyard Initiative: A Public-Private Partnership for Rebuilding Urban Play Spaces. J Health Polit Policy Law, 33 (3): 617–638.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2014. Disentangling Participation: Power and Decision-Making in Participatory Design. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Design anthropology in participatory design from ethnography to anthropological critique?
PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2In this workshop we explore the opportunities of ethnography and design anthropology in Participatory Design (PD) as an approach to design in an increasingly global and digital world. Traditionally, ethnography has been used in PD to research real-life ...
Towards Response-able PD: Putting Feminist New Materialisms to Work in the Practices of Participatory Design
PDC '22: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 1This paper contributes to recent discussions in the field of Participatory Design (PD) that have considered relationality, becoming, non-human, and more-than-human to invent alternative, more expansive, responsible, and accountable ways of understanding ...
Pursuing aesthetic inquiry in participatory design
PDC '08: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008We introduce aesthetic inquiry as an important perspective to pursue in Participatory Design. Within the scope of tradition and transcendence, we pursue aesthetic inquiry by tipping the scale towards transcendence, and by staging offline loops for ...
Comments