skip to main content
10.1145/3373477.3373700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rank-consistency-based multi-view learning with Universum

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In multi-view learning field, preserving data privacy is an important topic and a good solution is rank-consistency-based multi-view learning (RANC). RANC exploits view relationship and preserves data privacy simultaneously and related experiments also validate that RANC improves the individual view-specific learners with the usage of information from other views and parts of features. While performance of RANC is still limited by the insufficient of prior knowledge. Thus we introduce Universum learning into RANC to create additional unlabeled instances which provide more useful prior knowledge. The developed RANC with Universum learning is abbreviated to RANCU. Related experiments on some multi-view data sets have validated the performance of our RANCU theoretically and empirically.

References

  1. G. Tzortzis and A. Likas, Kernel-based Weighted Multi-view Clustering, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 675--684, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S.L. Sun and Q.J. Zhang, Multiple-view Multiple-learner Semi-supervised Learning, Neural Processing Letters, 34:229--240, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M.Q. Deng, C. Wang, and Q.F. Chen, Human Gait Recognition based on Deterministic Learning through Multiple Views Fusion, Pattern Recognition Letters, 78(C):56--63, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Wu, X.Y. Jing, X.G. You, D. Yue, R.M. Hu, and J.Y Yang, Multi-view low-rank dictionary learning for image classification, Pattern Recognition, 50:143--154, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S.H. Zhu, X. Sun, and D.L. jin, Multi-view semi-supervised learning for image classification, Neurocomputing, 208:136--142, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H.Y. Wang, X. Wang, J. Zheng, J.R. Deller, H.Y. Peng, L.Q. Zhu, W.G Chen, X.L. Li, R.J. Liu, and H.J. Bao, Video Object Matching across Multiple Non-overlapping Camera Views based on Multi-feature Fusion and Incremental Learning, Pattern Recognition, 47(12):3841--3851, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Sheikhpour, M.A. Sarram, S. Gharaghani, and M.A.Z. Chahooki, A Survey on semi-supervised feature selection methods, Pattern Recognition, 64:141--158, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H.J. Ye, D.C. Zhan, Y. Miao, Y. Jiang, and Z.H. Zhou, Rank Consistency based Multi-View Learning: A Privacy-Preserving Approach, ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 991--1000, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Bach, G. R. Lanckriet, and M. I. Jordan, Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm, In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 6--13, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Cortes, M. Mohri, and A. Rostamizadeh, Two-stage learning kernel algorithms, In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 239--246, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Rakotomamonjy, F. Bach, S. Canu, and Y. Grandvalet, SimpleMKL, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:2491--2521, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Kloft, U. Brefeld, S. Sonnenburg, and A. Zien, Non-sparse regularization and efficient training with multiple kernels, arxiv preprint arXiv:1003.0079.2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Gönen and E. Alpaydin, Localized multiple kernel learning, In proceeding of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 352--359, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Ye, D. Liu, I.H. Jhuo, and S.F. Chang, Robust late fusion with rank minimization, In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3021--3028, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Iosifidis, A. Tefas A, N. Nikolaidis, and I. Pitas, Multi-view human movement recognition based on fuzzy distances and linear discriminant analysis, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 116(3):347--360, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Rupnik and J. Shawe-Taylor, Multi-View Canonical Correlation Analysis, In proceeding of Slovenian KDD Conference on Data Mining Data Warehouses, pp. 1--4, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. X. Yin, Q. Huang, and X. Chen, Multiple View Locality Preserving Projections with Pairwise Constraints, Communication Systems and Information Technology, 100:859--866, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Blum and T. Mitchell, Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training, Eleventh Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92--100, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M.L. Zhang and Z.H. Zhou, Cotrade: Confident co-training with data editing, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 41(6):1612--1626, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. V. Sindhwani, P. Niyogi, and M. Belkin, A Co-Regularization Approach to Semi-supervised Learning with Multiple Views, In Proceeding of ICML workshop on Learning With Multiple Views, pp. 74--79, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. V. Vapnik and S. Kotz, Estimation of dependences based on empirical data, Springer, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. Cherkassky and W.Y. Dai, Empirical Study of the Universum SVM Learning for High-Dimensional Data, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5768:932--941, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Si, Document clustering with universum, International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 873--882, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Peng, G. Qian, and Y.Q. Ma, View-invariant pose recognition using multilinear analysis and the universum, Advances in Visual Computing, 5359:581--591, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Shen, P. Wang, F. Shen, and H. Wang, Uboost: boosting with the universum, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(4):825--832, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. X.H. Chen, S.C. Chen, and H. Xue, Universum linear discriminant analysis, Electronics Letters, 48(22):1407--1409, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Z. Wang, Y.J. Zhu, W.W. Liu, Z.H. Chen, and D.Q. Gao, Multi-view learning with universum, Knowledge-Based Systems, 70:376--391, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Weston, R. Collobert, F. Sinz, L. Bottou, and V. Vapnik, Inference with the universum, The 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1009--1016, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D.L. Liu, Y.J. Tian, R.F. Bie, and Y. Shi, Self-Universum support vector machine, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18:1813--1819, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y.M. Xu, C.D. Wang, and J.H. Lai, Weighted Multi-view Clustering with Feature Selection, Pattern Recognition, 53:25--35, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. A. Beck and M. Teboulle, A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(1):183--202, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein, Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 3(1):1--122, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Q. Gu, L. Zhu, and Z.H. Cai, Evaluation Measures of the Classification Performance of Imbalanced Data Sets, Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems, 51:461--471, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. L.A. Jeni, J.F. Cohn, and F.D.L. Torre, Facing Imbalanced Data-Recommendations for the Use of Performance Metrics. Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 245--251, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. C. Carpineto and G. Romano, A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval, ACM Computing Surveys, 44(1):159--170, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. R. Barandela, J.S. Sanchez, V. Garcia, and E. Rangel, Strategies for Learning in Class Imbalance Problems, Pattern Recognition, 36(3):849--851, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Rank-consistency-based multi-view learning with Universum

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AISS '19: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System
      November 2019
      253 pages
      ISBN:9781450372916
      DOI:10.1145/3373477

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      AISS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of95submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate41of95submissions,43%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader