skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331394acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Open-Access Platform for Transparent and Reproducible Structured Searching

Published:18 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Knowledge workers such as patent agents, recruiters and legal researchers undertake work tasks in which search forms a core part of their duties. In these instances, the search task often involves formulation of complex queries expressed as Boolean strings. However, creating effective Boolean queries remains an ongoing challenge, often compromised by errors and inefficiencies. In this paper, we demonstrate a new approach to structured searching in which concepts are expressed as objects on a two-dimensional canvas. Interactive query suggestions are provided via an NLP services API, and support is offered for optimising, translating and sharing search strategies as executable artefacts. This eliminates many sources of error, makes the query semantics more transparent, and offers an open-access platform for sharing reproducible search strategies and best practices.

References

  1. P. G. Anick, J. D. Brennan, R. A. Flynn, D. R. Hanssen, B. Alvey, and J. M. Robbins. 1990. A Direct Manipulation Interface for Boolean Information Retrieval via Natural Language Query. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'90). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 135--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. W. M. Bramer, M. L. Rethlefsen, J. Kleijnen, and O. H. Franco. 2017. Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Exploratory Study. Systematic Reviews 6, 245 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. P. de Vries,W. Alink, and R. Cornacchia. 2010. Search by strategy. In Proceedings of the third workshop on Exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval. ACM, 27--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. H. Goldberg and U. N. Gajendar. 2008. Graphical condition builder for facilitating database queries. U.S. Patent No. 7,383,513. 3 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Jones. 1998. Graphical Query Specification and Dynamic Result Previews for a Digital Library. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '98). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. McGowan, M. Sampson, D. M. Salzwedel, E. Cogo, V. Foerster, and C. Lefebvre. 2016. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 75 (2016), 40--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Nitsche and A. Nürnberger. 2006. QUEST: Querying Complex Information by Direct Manipulation. In: Yamamoto S. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Interaction Design. HIMI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8016 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Russell-Rose and J. Chamberlain. 2016. Searching for talent: The information retrieval challenges of recruitment professionals. Business Information Review 33, 1 (2016), 40--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. Russell-Rose and J. Chamberlain. 2017. Expert Search Strategies: The Information Retrieval Practices of Healthcare Information Professional. JMIR Med Inform 5, 4 (2017), e33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. Russell-Rose, J. Chamberlain, and L. Azzopardi. 2018. Information retrieval in the workplace: A comparison of professional search practices. Information Processing & Management 54, 6 (2018), 1042--1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Russell-Rose and P. Gooch. 2018. 2dSearch: A Visual Approach to Search Strategy Formulation. In Proceedings of DESIRES: Design of Experimental Search & Information REtrieval Systems (DESIRES 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. A. Saleh, M. A. Ratajeski, and J. LaDue. 2014. Development of a Web-based repository for sharing biomedical terminology from systematic review searches: a case study. Medical reference services quarterly 33, 2 (2014), 167--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Scells, D. Locke, and G. Zuccon. 2018. An Information Retrieval Experiment Framework for Domain Specific Applications. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1281--1284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H. Scells and G. Zuccon. 2018. searchrefiner: A Query Visualisation and Understanding Tool for Systematic Reviews. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. I. Tait. 2014. An introduction to professional search. In Professional search in the modern world. Springer, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Wing Pazer. 2013. The importance of the Boolean search query in social media monitoring tools. DragonSearch white paper (2013). https://www.dragon360.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/social-media-monitoring-tools-boolean-search-query.pdf (retrieved 22-Mar-2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Open-Access Platform for Transparent and Reproducible Structured Searching

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
            July 2019
            1512 pages
            ISBN:9781450361729
            DOI:10.1145/3331184

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 July 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate84of426submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader