skip to main content
10.1145/3326365.3326404acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Commitment on data privacy towards e-governance: The case of local government units

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of ICT in the government sector is a crucial tactic in achieving different dimensions of public trust and services, especially that government offices and local government units (LGUs) are gearing toward e-governance as a way to manage and utilize ICT infrastructure. Moreover, in engaging ICT services, personal data and other critical information must be safeguarded and not exposed publicly. In the Philippines, data privacy act of 2012 (DPA 2012) was promulgated to vanguard sensitive information and data protection, and impose legal sanctions to any organization breached therein. This empirical study aims to explore LGUs on their commitment to data privacy, assess their level of compliance and examine factors that hinder their defiance. The method used is qualitative research in a case study technique, using a multiple case holistic design. Outcomes pattern matching is also used to triangulate records against expected patterns. Results show that before the enactment of DPA 2012, the LGUs under study are not compliant. However, after the passage and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) took action, a significant leap has observed. Determinants of compliance, such as deterrence, legitimacy and moral obligation have compelling casual factors why LGUs are complying with the law. Upon further assessment, pressing concerns are also perceived, such as lack of awareness, wait-and-see attitude, and resource and time constraints. In sum, LGUs are trying to fast-track, overhaul or re-engineering their processes and operations, including ICT infrastructure acquisition, resource allocation, and qualified ICT personnel apportionment as compliance initiatives; and commit themselves to full compliance towards the establishment of better government and e-governance.

References

  1. Apigee Institute, "Three Keys to Digital Transformation," Apigee Institute, p. 7, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Savoldelli, C. Codagnone, and G. Misuraca, "Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption," Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. SUPPL.1, pp. S63--S71, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Department of Information and Communications Technology, "E-Gov Masterplan to Fast-Track Efficiency and Transparency in Government." {Online}. Available: http://dict.gov.ph/e-gov-masterplan-to-fast-track-efficiency-and-transparency-in-government/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. IGovPhil, E-Government Master Plan 2, vol. 0. 2016, pp. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. IGovPhil, e-Government in the Philippines. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Singh, "A Critical impulse to e-Governance in the Asia pacific," A Crit. Impuls. to E-Governance Asia Pacific, vol. 9788132216, pp. 1--187, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. D. Birnhack, "The EU Data Protection Directive: An engine of a global regime," Comput. Law Secur. Rep., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 508--520, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. M. Atinc, "Investigations into Using Data to Improve Learning PHILIPPINES CASE STUDY," 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. R. D. Ching, B. S. Fabito, and N. J. Celis, "Data Privacy Act of 2012: A Case Study Approach to Philippine Government Agencies Compliance," Soshum 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. W. Trochim, "Outcome Pattern Matching and Program Theory.pdf," Eval. Program Plann., vol. 12, pp. 355--366, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. C. J. Palvia and S. S. Sharma, "E-Government and e-governance: definitions/domain framework and status around the world," Found. e-Government, pp. 1--12, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. S. H. CHOWDHURY et al., "Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems," For. Policy Econ., vol. 132, no. 2, p. 48, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Sohrabi Safa, R. Von Solms, and S. Furnell, "Information security policy compliance model in organizations," Comput. Secur., vol. 56, pp. 1--13, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Zerlang, "GDPR: a milestone in convergence for cyber-security and compliance," Netw. Secur., vol. 2017, no. 6, pp. 8--11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Lachaud, "The General Data Protection Regulation and the rise of certification as a regulatory instrument," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., no. August 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Tikkinen-Piri, A. Rohunen, and J. Markkula, "EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal data collecting companies," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., no. 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Barnard-Wills, C. Pauner Chulvi, and P. De Hert, "Data protection authority perspectives on the impact of data protection reform on cooperation in the EU," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 587--598, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. C. Raab and I. Szekely, "Data protection authorities and information technology," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 421--433, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. R. Fazlida and J. Said, "Information Security: Risk, Governance and Implementation Setback," Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 28, no. April, pp. 243--248, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. O. R. X. News, "ORX News 2014 Review ORX News 2014 Review Business Line: BL0300 - Retail Banking," pp. 1--8, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Greenleaf and W. Il Park, "South Korea's innovations in data privacy principles: Asian comparisons," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 492--505, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Japan Government, Act on the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 57 of (2003). 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W. B. Chik, "The Singapore personal data protection act and an assessment of future trends in data privacy reform," Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 554--575, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G. of Malaysia, Personal Data Protection Act of 2010, no. June. 2012, pp. 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Congress of the Philippines, "Republic Act No. 8792 AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE RECOGNITION AND USE OF ELECTRONIC," pp. 1--17, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. N. J. Celis, "Compliance Theory: A Case Study Approach in Understanding Organizational Commitment," DLSU Bus. Econ. Rev., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 88--118, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Congress of the Philippines, "RA 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012." 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. NPC, "The National Privacy Commission," 2015. {Online}. Available: https://privacy.gov.ph/about-us/#visionmission. {Accessed: 02-Mar-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Congress of the Philippines, "20120912-RA-10175-BSA_CyberCrime.pdf." 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. R. Yin, Case Study Research Design and Methods. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. P. Baxter and S. Jack, "Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation," Qual. Rep., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 544--559, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. N. Gunningham, D. Thorton, and R. A. Kagan, "Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environment Protection," Law Policy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 289--316, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. J. G. Sutinen and K. Kuperan, "A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance," Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 26, no. 1/2/3, pp. 174--193, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. W. M. Trochim and D. McLinden, "Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping," Eval. Program Plann., vol. 60, pp. 166--175, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. V. A. Pitogo and M. R. D. Ching, "Understanding Philippine National Agency's Commitment on Data Privacy Act of 2012: A Case Study Perspective," in Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government, 2018, pp. 64--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Commitment on data privacy towards e-governance: The case of local government units

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      April 2019
      538 pages
      ISBN:9781450366441
      DOI:10.1145/3326365

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '19 Paper Acceptance Rate81of171submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader