skip to main content
10.1145/3325480.3325493acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shaping Sounds: The Role of Gesture in Collaborative Spatial Music Composition

Published:13 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an observational study of collaborative spatial music composition. We uncover the practical methods two experienced music producers use to coordinate their understanding of multi-modal and spatial representations of music as part of their workflow. We show embodied spatial referencing as a significant feature of the music producers' interactions. Our analysis suggests that gesture is used to understand, communicate and form action through a process of shaping sounds in space. This metaphor highlights how aesthetic assessments are collaboratively produced and developed through coordinated spatial activity. Our implications establish sensitivity to embodied action in the development of collaborative workspaces for creative, spatial-media production of music.

References

  1. 2014. Dolby Atmos Next Generation Audio for Cinema . Technical Report 3. Dolby Laboratories. http://www.dolby.com/us/en/professional/cinema/products/dolby-atmos-next-generation-audio-for-cinema-white-paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017. Dolby Atmos production suite guide. Technical Report April. Dolby Laboratories.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Saul Albert. 2017. Research Methods: Conversation Analysis . In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes. 99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Martha W Alibali. 2005. Gesture in Spatial Cognition: Expressing, Communicating, and Thinking About Spatial Information . Spatial Cognition and Computation April 2013 (2005), 37--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Enda Bates and Francis M. Boland. 2016. Spatial Music, Virtual Reality and 360 Media . AES Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (2016), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joe Bennett. 2012. Constraint, Collaboration and Creativity in Popular Songwriting Teams . In The Act of Musical Composition: Studies in the Creative Process, D. Collins (Ed.). SEMPRE Studies in the Psychology of Music, Farnham, Chapter 6, 139--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joe Bennett. 2014. Collaborative Songwriting -- The Ontology Of Negotiated Creativity In Popular Music Studio Practice . Journal on the Art of Record Production 1 (2014), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Phillip Brooker and Wes Sharrock. 2013. Remixing Music Together : The Use and Abuse of Virtual Studio Software as a Hobby . In Ethnomethodology at Play. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Peter Tolmie (Ed.). Ashgate, London, 135--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillip Brooker and Wes Sharrock. 2016. Collaborative Music-Making with Digital Audio Workstations: The n-th Member as a Heuristic Device for Understanding the Role of Technologies in Audio Composition . Symbolic Interaction 39, 3 (2016), 463--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2012. Mutual engagement in social music making . Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 78 LNICST, 0 (2012), 260--266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Byrne. 2012. How music works. (2012). http://site.ebrary.com/id/10602980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Andy Clark. 1998. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again . 292 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andy Crabtree, Peter Tolmie, and Mark Rouncefield. 2012. Doing Design Ethnography . Springer. 205 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. William J Davies. 2015. Cognition of soundscapes and other complex acoustic scenes. In Inter Noise. San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jé ré mie Garcia, Thibaut Carpentier, and Jean Bresson. 2017. Interactive-Compositional Authoring of Sound Spatialization . Journal of New Music Research 46, 1 (2017), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gabriela Goldschmidt. 1991. The Dialectics of Sketching . Creativity Research Journal 4, 2 (1991), 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Charles Goodwin. 2003. Pointing as situated practice . Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (2003), 217--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Charles Goodwin and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and Construction of Context . In Rethinking Context, Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 147--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Maya Gratier. 2008. Grounding in musical interaction: Evidence from jazz performances . Musicae Scientiae (2008), 71--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Patrick G. T. Healey and S.a. Battersby. 2009. The interactional geometry of a three-way conversation . Proceedings of the 31 st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2009), 785--790. http://141.14.165.6/CogSci09/papers/138/paper138.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Patrick G. T. Healey, Joe Leach, and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2005. Inter-play: Understanding group music improvisation as a form of everyday interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Forum on Less is More-Simple Computing in an Age of Complexity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Patrick G. T. Healey and Charlotte R. Peters. 2007. The conversational organisation of drawing . 1st International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies, PLT 2007 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Claude Heath and Patrick G. T. Healey. 2011. Making Space for Interaction: Architect's Design Dialogues. In Gesture Workshop. Athens, Greece. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research . SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Christian Heath, Marina Jirotka, Paul Luff, and Jon Hindmarsh. 1995. The Individual and the Collaborative : the Interactional Organisation of Trading in a City Dealing Room . Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 3, 1 (1995), 147--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1991. Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London Underground control rooms . Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (1991), 65--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1992. Collaboration and control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology . Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal 1 (1--2), 1990 (1992), 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. John Heritage and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction . Social Psychology Quarterly 68, 1 (2005), 15--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research . Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 2 (jun 2000), 174--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jay Jantz, Adam Molnar, and Ramses Alcaide. 2017. A brain-computer interface for extended reality interfaces. In SIGGRAPH '17 ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 VR Village, Vol. 13. 73--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. interaction analysis: Foundations and practice . Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Seokmin Kang, Barbara Tversky, and John B. Black. 2015. Coordinating Gesture, Word, and Diagram: Explanations for Experts and Novices . Spatial Cognition and Computation 15, 1 (2015), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Adam Kendon. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance . Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Robin Laney, Chris Dobbyn, Anna Xambó, Mattia Schirosa, Dorothy Miell, Karen Littleton, and Nick Dalton. 2010. Issues and techniques for collaborative music making on multi-touch surfaces . 7th Sound and Music Computing Conference (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Glenn McGarry, Peter Tolmie, Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, and Alan Chamberlain. 2017. "They're all going out to something weird": Workflow, Legacy and Metadata in the Music Production Process . Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sean McGrath, Alan Chamberlain, and Steve Benford. 2016. Making music together : an exploration of amateur and pro-am Grime music production. In Audio Mostly, Vol. 2016. 4--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. F Melchior, A Churnside, and S Spors. 2012. Emerging Technology Trends in Spatial Audio . SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal 121, 6 (2012), 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Keith Murphy. 2003. Building Meaning in Interaction: Rethinking Gesture Classifications . Crossroads of Language Interaction and Culture 2003 UC Regents CA Vol 5. p. 27--47 2005 5, 1972 (2003), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Keith M. Murphy. 2005. Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice . Semiotica 2005, 156 (2005), 113--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Shahin Nabavian and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2006. Analysing group creativity: A distributed cognitive study of joint music composition. In Proceedings of cognitive science. 1856--1861. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/ nickbk/papers/AnalysingGroupCreativityAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Matt Rahaim. 2008. Gesture and melody in Indian vocal music . Gesture 8, 3 (2008), 325--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Francis Rumsey. 2001. Spatial Audio . 240 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Francis Rumsey. 2016. Virtual Reality: Mixing Rendering, Believabiity . J. Audio Eng. Soc 64, 12 (2016), 1073--1077. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=18538Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. R. K. Sawyer and S DeZutter. 2009. Distributed Creativity: How Collective Creations Emerge From Collaboration . Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3, 2 (2009), 81--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Mike Scaife and Yvonne Rogers. 1996. External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human Computer Studies 45, 2 (1996), 185--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Jean-Baptiste Thiebaut and Patrick G. T. Healey. 2007. Sketching Musical Compositions . Cognitive Science Society Journal (2007), 1079--1084.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jean-baptiste Thiebaut, Patrick G. T. Healey, and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2008. Drawing Electroacoustic Music. In ICMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Barbara Tversky. 2014. The Cognitive Design of Tools of Thought . Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 1 (2014), 99--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Barbara Tversky. 2017. Gestures can create diagrams (that are neither imagistic nor analog) . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017), e73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Barbara Tversky, Azadeh Jamalian, Valeria Giardino, Seokmin Kang, and Angela Kessell. 2013. Comparing Gestures And Diagrams. In Proceedings of the 10th International Gesture Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Robin Wolff, Dave J. Roberts, Anthony Steed, and Oliver Otto. 2007. A review of telecollaboration technologies with respect to closely coupled collaboration . International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 29, 1 (2007), 11--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Anna Xambó, Robin Laney, Chris Dobbyn, and Sergi Puig Jordà. 2012. Towards a taxonomy for video analysis on collaborative musical tabletops. In Proceedings of BCS HCI 2012 Workshops: Video Analysis Techniques for Human-Computer Interaction. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Shaping Sounds: The Role of Gesture in Collaborative Spatial Music Composition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition
      June 2019
      745 pages
      ISBN:9781450359177
      DOI:10.1145/3325480

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&C '19 Paper Acceptance Rate30of101submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader