skip to main content
10.1145/3322134.3323932acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New Approach of Big Data and Education: Any Term Must Be in the Characters Chessboard as a Super Matrix

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new approach that must cover all the terms. Therefore, people's educational process is like making a variety of choices in a super-chessboard of language or a matrix composed of words formally. The method of redemption is: First, construct the chessboard, and then, through human-computer interaction and collaboration, generate massive amounts of big data, including various terms representing knowledge, and finally, through machine learning and man-machine interactive to analyze, compare, and query or reuse any of these terms. The result: an accurate query of terms, which can be automatically queried in multiple ways through bilingual or multi-lingual converters. The significance is that the method and its results can be used not only for machine-assisted instruction in the network environment, but also for machine-assisted intelligent text analysis and knowledge module finishing in the network environment, thus opening up view of big data and education. The new approach, because any term must be in the word matrix, each user and its agents query them very accurately and efficiently.

References

  1. Dong, T. Y. 2016. A simple analysis of alphago. Acta Automatica Sinica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dong, X., Wu, J., & Zhou, L.. 2017. Demystifying alphago zero as alphago gan. DOI: arXiv:1711.09091Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Granter, S. R., Beck, A. H., & Jr, P. D. 2017. Alphago, deep learning, and the future of the human microscopist. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 141(5), 619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chouard, T.. 2016. The go files: ai computer clinches victory against go champion. Nature.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chouard, T.. 2016. The go files: ai computer wraps up 4--1 victory against human champion. Nature.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., & Guez, A., et al. 2017. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676), 354--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gibney, E. 2017. Self-taught ai is best yet at strategy game go. Nature.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zou, S., & Zou, X.. 2017. Understanding: how to resolve ambiguity. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hua, W., Zou, S., Zou, X., & Liu, G.. (2018). Using Two Formal Strategies to Eliminate Ambiguity in Poetry Text. International Conference on Intelligence Science. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mitra, J., Shen, K. K., Ghose, S., Bourgeat, P., Fripp, J., & Salvado, O., et al. 2016. Statistical machine learning to identify traumatic brain injury (tbi) from structural disconnections of white matter networks. Neuroimage, 129, 247--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Holden, D., Saito, J., & Komura, T. 2016. A deep learning framework for character motion synthesis and editing. Acm Transactions on Graphics, 35(4), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gulcehre, C., Chandar, S., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. 2018. Dynamic neural turing machine with continuous and discrete addressing schemes. Neural Computation, 30(4), 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cerf, V. G. 2018. Turing test 2. Communications of the Acm, 61(5), 5--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rapaport, W. J. 1986. Searle's experiments with thought. Philosophy of Science, 53(2), 271--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Damper, R. I.. 2006. The logic of searle's chinese room argument. Minds & Machines, 16(2), 163--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zou Xiaohui, & Zou Shunpeng. 2011. Indirect calculation model and indirect formalization method. Software, 32(5), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Zou Xiaohui, & Zou Shunpeng. 2015. Bilingual Information Processing Methods and Principles. Computer Applications and Software, 32(11), 69--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zou Xiaohui, & Zou Shunpeng. 2013. Two generalized formal strategies. Computer Applications and Software (9), 194--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zou Xiaohui, & Zou Shunpeng. 2012. The New Mission of Contemporary Chinese Universities: Cultural Heritage and Innovation Based on Chinese Thinking and Bilingual Processing. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology: Social Science Edition, 25(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiaohui, Z., Shunpeng, Z., & Lijun, K.. 2017. Fundamental law of information: proved by both numbers and characters in conjugate matrices. Proceedings, 1(3), 60-.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shunpeng, Z., & Xiaohui, Z.. 2017. Ecological characteristics of information and its scientific research. Proceedings, 1(3), 59-.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Big Data and Education
    March 2019
    146 pages
    ISBN:9781450361866
    DOI:10.1145/3322134

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 30 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader