skip to main content
10.1145/3314074.3314101acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Fine QTL mapping for meat quality traits in French Charolaise breed using HD SNP data

Published:28 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Meat quality is a complex and multifactorial trait. Several factors can influence this character, including genetic and environmental factors. Based on phenotypic data for three traits related to muscular characteristics and /or meat quality in Charolais French beef cattle breed, 108 QTLs (Quantitative Trait Loci) related to these phenotypes were identified using a Bayesian approach. However, this method does not give a confidence interval. The objective of this study is to determine the confidence intervals of these QTLs based on linkage disequilibrium analysis in the Charolais breed and to identify candidate genes for the tenderness score based on mouse phenotype. QTL intervals were defined with a range from 1.93 to 20.80 Mb and an average of 13.04 Mb. Thus, 27 putative candidate genes for the tenderness score have been identified.

References

  1. FranceAgriMer, 2018. "Fiches produits FranceAgriMer - viande bovine", publications, July 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubuisson, C., Lioret, S., Touvier, M., Dufour, A., Calamassi-Tran, G., Volatier, J., & Lafay, L. (2010). Trends in food and nutritional intakes of French adults from 1999 to 2007: Results from the INCA surveys. British Journal of Nutrition, 103(7), 1035--1048.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Geay, Y., D. Bauchart, J. F. Hocquette, and J. Culioli. 2001. Effect of nutritional factors on biochemical, structural and metabolic characteristics of muscles in ruminants, consequences on dietetic value and sensorial qualities of meat. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 41:1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Allais, S., H. Levéziel, N. Payet-Duprat, J. F. Hocquette, J. Lepetit, S. Rousset, C. Denoyelle, C. Bernard-Capel, L. Journaux, A. Bonnot, and G. Renand. 2010. The two mutations Q204X and nt821 of the myostatin gene affect carcass and meat quality in heterozygous young bulls of French beef breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 88:446--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Warner RD, Greenwood PL, Pethick DW, Ferguson DM. Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality. Meat Sci. 2010;86:171--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Allais, S., H. Levéziel, N. Payet-Duprat, J. F. Hocquette, J. Lepetit, S. Rousset, C. Denoyelle, C. Bernard-Capel, L. Journaux, A. Bonnot, and G. Renand. 2010. The two mutations Q204X and nt821 of the myostatin gene affect carcass and meat quality in heterozygous young bulls of French beef breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 88:446--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Barendse, W. J. 2002. DNA markers for meat tenderness. International patent application PCT/AU02/00122. International patent publication WO 02/064820 A1. 22 August 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Han, SH., Cho, IC., Ko, MS. et al. A promoter polymorphism of MSTN g.--371T>A and its associations with carcass traits in Korean cattl. Mol Biol Rep (2012) 39: 3767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. S. Schenkel, S. P. Miller, Z. Jiang, I. B. Mandell, X. Ye, H. Li, J. W. Wilton; Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the calpastatin gene with carcass and meat quality traits of beef cattle, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 84, Issue 2, 1 February 2006, Pages 291--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Casas, S. N. White, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, M. Koohmaraie, D. G. Riley, C. C. Chase, D. D. Johnson, T. P. L. Smith; Effects of calpastatin and μ-calpain markers in beef cattle on tenderness traits, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 84, Issue 3, 1 April 2006, Pages 520--525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Boichard D, Grohs C, Bourgeois F, Cerqueira F, Faugeras R, Neau A, Rupp R, Amigues Y, Boscher MY, Levéziel H. Detection of genes influencing economic traits in three French dairy cattle breeds. Genet Sel Evol. 2003;35:77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Legarra, A., Croiseau, P., Sanchez, M. P., Teyssèdre S., Sallé, G., Allais, S., Fritz, S., Rénée Moreno, C., Ricard, A., and Elsen, J; M., Genetics Selection Evolution (2015) 47:6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ: Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12(1):186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A van den Berg, I., Fritz, S., & Boichard, D. (2013). QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study. Genetics, selection, evolution: GSE, 45(1), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Gunia, R. Saintilan, E. Venot, C. Hozé, M. N. Fouilloux, F. Phocas; Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 92, Issue 8, 1 August 2014, Pages 3258--3269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel F. A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives. BMC Genom. 2014;15:478.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Clayton D (2015). snpStats: SnpMatrix and XSnpMatrix classes and methods. R package version 1.28.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaun Purcell and Christopher Chang, PLINK v1.90b3.34, www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Durinck S, Spellman P, Birney E, Huber W (2009). "Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt." Nature Protocols, 4, 1184--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M (2001). Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet 69: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ron, M., & Weller, J. I. (2007). From QTL to QTN identification in livestock - Winning by points rather than knock-out: A review. Animal Genetics, 38(5), 429--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. Yoshida, Y. Pan, H. Hanada, Y. Iwata and M. Shigekawa: Bidirectional signaling between sarcoglycans and the integrin adhesion system in cultured L6 myocytes. J Biol Chem, 273(3), 1583--90 (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hack, A. A., Ly, C. T., Jiang, F., Clendenin, C. J., Sigrist, K. S., Wollmann, R. L., & Mcnally, E. M. (1998). γ-Sarcoglycan Deficiency Leads to Muscle Membrane Defects and Apoptosis Independent of Dystrophin, 142(5), 1279--1287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. MacArthur, Daniel G, Seto, Jane T, Raftery, Joanna M, Quinlan, Kate G, Huttley, Gavin A, Hook, Jeff W, Lemckert, Frances A, Kee, Anthony J, Edwards, Michael R, Berman, Yemima, Hardeman, Edna C, Gunning, Peter W, Easteal, Simon, Yang, Nan, North, Kathryn N, (2007). Loss of ACTN3 gene function alters mouse muscle metabolism and shows evidence of positive selection in humans. Nature Genetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stohn, J. P., Perreault, N. G., Wang, Q., Liaw, L., & Lindner, V. (2012). Cthrc1, a Novel Circulating Hormone Regulating Metabolism. PLoS ONE, 7(10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Walji, Tezin A et al. "Characterization of metabolic health in mouse models of fibrillin-1 perturbation" Matrix biology: journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology vol. 55 (2016): 63--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhixiong Li, Yaou Xu, Yaqiu Lin. Transcriptome analyses reveal genes of alternative splicing associated with muscle development in chickens. Gene. Volume 676, 2018, Pages 146--155,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fine QTL mapping for meat quality traits in French Charolaise breed using HD SNP data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SMC '19: Proceedings of the New Challenges in Data Sciences: Acts of the Second Conference of the Moroccan Classification Society
      March 2019
      156 pages
      ISBN:9781450361293
      DOI:10.1145/3314074

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      © 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader