skip to main content
10.1145/3274895.3274928acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

ADAPT-pricing: a dynamic and predictive technique for pricing to maximize revenue in ridesharing platforms

Published:06 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ridesharing platforms use dynamic pricing as a means to control the network's supply and demand at different locations and times (e.g., Lyft's Prime Time and Uber's Surge Pricing) to increase revenue. These algorithms only consider the network's current supply and demand only at a ride's origin to adjust the price of the ride. In this work, we show how we can increase the platform's revenue while lowering the prices as compared to state-of-the-art algorithms, by considering the network's future demand. Furthermore, we show if rather than setting the price of a ride only based on the supply and demand at its origin, we use predictive supply and demand at both the ride's origin and destination, we can further increase the platform's overall revenue. Using a real-world data set from New York City, we show our pricing method can increase the revenue by up to 15% while reducing the price of the rides by an average of 5%. Furthermore, we show that our methods are resilient to up to 25% error in future demand prediction.

References

  1. Mohammad Asghari and Cyrus Shahabi. An on-line truthful and individually rational pricing mechanism for ride-sharing. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, SIGSPATIAL'17, pages 7:1--7:10, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammad Asghari, Dingxiong Deng, Cyrus Shahabi, Ugur Demiryurek, and Yaguang Li. Price-aware real-time ride-sharing at scale: An auction-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, GIS '16, pages 3:1--3:10, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Siddhartha Banerjee, Ramesh Johari, and Carlos Riquelme. Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC '15, pages 639--639, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kostas Bimpikis, Ozan Candogan, and Daniela Saban. Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2868080, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gérard P. Cachon, Kaitlin M. Daniels, and Ruben Lobel. The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3):368--384, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Juan Castillo, Daniel T. Knoepfle, and E. Glen Weyl. Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2890666, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yiwei Chen and Ming Hu. Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2859864, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. Peeking beneath the hood of uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference, IMC '15, pages 495--508, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Keith Chen. Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the uber platform. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC '16, pages 455--455, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shih-Fen Cheng, Duc Thien Nguyen, and Hoong Chuin Lau. Mechanisms for arranging ride sharing and fare splitting for last-mile travel demands. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS '14, pages 1505--1506, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Meng-Fen Chiang, Tuan-Anh Hoang, and Ee-Peng Lim. Where are the passengers?: A grid-based gaussian mixture model for taxi bookings. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, SIGSPATIAL '15, pages 32:1--32:10, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Liran Einav, Chiara Farronato, and Jonathan Levin. Peer-to-peer markets. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhixuan Fang, Longbo Huang, and Adam Wierman. Prices and subsidies in the sharing economy. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '17, pages 53--62, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harish Guda and Upender Subramanian. Strategic surge pricing on on-demand service platforms. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2895227, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Juho Hamari, Mimmi Sjöklint, and Antti Ukkonen. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 67(9):2047--2059, September 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ramón Iglesias, Federico Rossi, Kevin Wang, David Hallac, Jure Leskovec, and Marco Pavone. Data-driven model predictive control of autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '18, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nikolay Laptev, Jason Yosinski, Li Erran Li, and Slawek Smyl. Time-series extreme event forecasting with neural networks at uber. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '17, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Prime time for drivers. https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-us/articles/115012926467. Accessed: 2018-01-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. New york city neighborhoods. http://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/opendata.page#other. Accessed: 2017-11-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. New york city taxi trips. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/html/about/trip_record_data.shtml. Accessed: 2017-03-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Erhun Ozkan and Amy Ward. Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2844451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Engineering extreme event forecasting at uber with recurrent neural networks. https://eng.uber.com/neural-networks/. Accessed: 2018-02-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Zhao, D. Khryashchev, J. Freire, C. Silva, and H. Vo. Predicting taxi demand at high spatial resolution: Approaching the limit of predictability. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, BigData '16, pages 833--842, Dec 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lingxue Zhu and Nikolay Laptev. Deep and confident prediction for time series at uber. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW '17, pages 103--110, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. ADAPT-pricing: a dynamic and predictive technique for pricing to maximize revenue in ridesharing platforms

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGSPATIAL '18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
          November 2018
          655 pages
          ISBN:9781450358897
          DOI:10.1145/3274895

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 November 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGSPATIAL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate30of150submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader