skip to main content
research-article

Maintenance of Smart Buildings using Fault Trees

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Timely maintenance is an important means of increasing system dependability and life span. Fault Maintenance trees (FMTs) are an innovative framework incorporating both maintenance strategies and degradation models and serve as a good planning platform for balancing total costs (operational and maintenance) with dependability of a system. In this work, we apply the FMT formalism to a Smart Building application and propose a framework that efficiently encodes the FMT into Continuous Time Markov Chains. This allows us to obtain system dependability metrics such as system reliability and mean time to failure, as well as costs of maintenance and failures over time, for different maintenance policies. We illustrate the pertinence of our approach by evaluating various dependability metrics and maintenance strategies of a Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning system.1

References

  1. Marwan Ammar, Khaza Anuarul Hoque, and Otmane Ait Mohamed. 2016. Formal analysis of fault tree using probabilistic model checking: A solar array case study. In Proceedings of the Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon’16). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Handbook ASHRAE. 1996. HVAC systems and equipment. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vladimir Babishin and Sharareh Taghipour. 2016. Optimal maintenance policy for multicomponent systems with periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 24 (2016), 10480--10505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Francesca Boem, Riccardo M. G. Ferrari, Christodoulos Keliris, Thomas Parisini, and Marios M. Polycarpou. 2017. A distributed networked approach for fault detection of large-scale systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 62, 1 (2017), 18--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Luca Bortolussi and Jane Hillston. 2012. Fluid approximation of CTMC with deterministic delays. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST’12). IEEE, 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nathalie Cauchi, Khaza Anuarul Hoque, Alessandro Abate, and Mariëlle Stoelinga. 2017. Efficient probabilistic model checking of smart building maintenance using fault maintenance trees. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments. ACM, 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nathalie Cauchi, Karel Macek, and Alessandro Abate. 2017. Model-based predictive maintenance in building automation systems with user discomfort. Energy 138 (2017), 306--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Edmund M. Clarke, E. Allen Emerson, and A. Prasad Sistla. 1986. Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 8 (1986), 244--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Frits Dannenberg, Marta Kwiatkowska, Chris Thachuk, and Andrew J. Turberfield. 2013. DNA walker circuits: Computational potential, design, and verification. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on DNA-Based Computers. Springer, 31--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lu Feng, Clemens Wiltsche, Laura Humphrey, and Ufuk Topcu. 2015. Controller synthesis for autonomous systems interacting with human operators. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 6th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM, 70--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Holger Hermanns and Lijun Zhang. 2011. From concurrency models to numbers. In Nato Science for Peace and Security Series. IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Khaza Anuarul Hoque, Otmane Ait Mohamed, and Yvon Savaria. 2015. Towards an accurate reliability, availability and maintainability analysis approach for satellite systems based on probabilistic model checking. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation 8 Test in Europe Conference 8 Exhibition. EDA Consortium, 1635--1640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Khaza Anuarul Hoque, Otmane Ait Mohamed, and Yvon Savaria. 2017. Formal analysis of SEU mitigation for early dependability and performability analysis of FPGA-based space applications. J. Appl. Logic 25 (2017), 47--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Khaza Anuarul Hoque, O. Ait Mohamed, Yvon Savaria, and Claude Thibeault. 2014. Probabilistic model checking based DAL analysis to optimize a combined TMR-blind-scrubbing mitigation technique for FPGA-based aerospace applications. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign (MEMOCODE’14). IEEE, 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Faisal I. Khan and Mahmoud M. Haddara. 2003. Risk-based maintenance (RBM): A quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J. Loss Prevent. Process Industr. 16, 6 (2003), 561--573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, and David Parker. 2007. Stochastic model checking. In International School on Formal Methods for the Design of Computer, Communication and Software Systems. Springer, 220--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, and David Parker. 2011. PRISM 4.0: Verification of probabilistic real-time systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’11) (LNCS), G. Gopalakrishnan and S. Qadeer (Eds.), Vol. 6806. Springer, 585--591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, and David Parker. Advances and challenges of probabilistic model checking. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton’10). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Axel Legay, Benoît Delahaye, and Saddek Bensalem. 2010. Statistical model checking: An overview. RV 10 (2010), 122--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Z. F. Li, Yi Ren, L. L. Liu, and Z. L. Wang. 2015. Parallel algorithm for finding modules of large-scale coherent fault trees. Microelectronics Reliability 55, 10 (2015), 1400--1403. In Proceedings of the 26th European Symposium on Reliability of Electron Devices, Failure Physics and Analysis (ESREF’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Karel Macek, Petr Endel, Nathalie Cauchi, and Alessandro Abate. 2017. Long-term predictive maintenance: A study of optimal cleaning of biomass boilers. Energy Build. 150 (2017), 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Enno Ruijters, Dennis Guck, Peter Drolenga, and Mariëlle Stoelinga. 2016. Fault maintenance trees: Reliability centered maintenance via statistical model checking. In Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS’16). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Enno Ruijters and Mariëlle Stoelinga. 2015. Fault tree analysis: A survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools. Comput. Sci. Rev. 15 (2015), 29--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Umair Siddique, Khaza Anuarul Hoque, and Taylor T. Johnson. 2017. Formal specification and dependability analysis of optical communication networks. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation 8 Test in Europe Conference 8 Exhibition (DATE’17). IEEE, 1564--1569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ying Yan, Peter B. Luh, and Krishna R. Pattipati. 2017. Fault diagnosis of HVAC air-handling systems considering fault propagation impacts among components. IEEE Trans. Auto. Sci. Eng. 14, 2 (Apr. 2017), 705--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Olexandr Yevkin. 2016. An efficient approximate Markov chain method in dynamic fault tree analysis. Qual. Reliabil. Eng. Int. 32, 4 (2016), 1509--1520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Håkan L. S. Younes, Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, and David Parker. 2006. Numerical vs. statistical probabilistic model checking. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 8, 3 (2006), 216--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xiaojun Zhou, Lifeng Xi, and Jay Lee. 2007. Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safe. 92, 4 (2007), 530--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Maintenance of Smart Buildings using Fault Trees

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 14, Issue 3-4
      Special Issue on BuildSys'17
      November 2018
      392 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/3294070
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2018
      • Accepted: 1 June 2018
      • Revised: 1 May 2018
      • Received: 1 January 2018
      Published in tosn Volume 14, Issue 3-4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader