skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3188450acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Exploring Tangible Ways to Evaluate User Experience for Elders

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

While user experience assessment enables understanding users' perception about a product, limitations have been encountered when elders use questionnaires to evaluate user experience. In this paper we present the design process of Aestimo, a tangible interface to assist elderly people when evaluating the user experience of interactive prototypes. Our prototype is a simplification of the AttrakDiff questionnaire, which gives a chance to record one's overall opinion (i.e., speech) and emotions. In addition, our design uses playful interaction styles that are familiar to the elderly. In a preliminary evaluation, elderly found Aestimo entertaining and easy to use. As future work, we aim to explore new materials in building Aestimo and to perform a comprehensive evaluation with several elders.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. 2017. Older Adults health and age-related changes reality vs myth. (2017). http://www.apa.org/pi/aging/resources/guides/myth-reality.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Cheng, A. Lucero, and J. Buur. 2016. PAUSE: Exploring Mindful Touch Interaction on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindtrek '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 184--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. Gerling, F. Schulte, and M. Masuch. 2011. Designing and Evaluating Digital Games for Frail Elderly Persons. In Proceedings of Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11). ACM, NY, USA, Article 62, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Golsteijn, S. Gallache, L. Koeman, L. Wall, S. Andberg, Y. Rogers, and L. Capra. 2015. VoxBox: A Tangible Machine That Gathers Opinions from the Public at Events. In Proceedings of Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, NY, USA, 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Häikiö, A. Wallin, M. Isomursu, H. Ailisto, T. Matinmikko, and T. Huomo. 2007. Touch-based User Interface for Elderly Users. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '07). ACM, NY, USA, 289--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. Hanson. 2009. Age and Web Access: The Next Generation. In Proceedings of Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A '09). ACM, NY, USA, 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Harjumaa and M. Isomursu. 2012. Field Work With Older Users-Challenges in Design and Evaluation of Information Systems. (01 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Heerink, B. Krose, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. 2006. Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Journal of Assistive Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol. 7. 33--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Isleifsdottir and M. Larusdottir. 2008. Measuring the user experience of a task oriented software. In Proceedings of Workshop on Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement. 97--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO DIS 9241--210. 2010. Ergonomics of human system interaction - part 210. Technical Report. Inter. Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Lucero, E. Karapanos, J. Arrasvuori, and H. Korhonen. 2014. Playful or Gameful?: Creating Delightful User Experiences. interactions 21, 3 (May 2014), 34--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Nilsson, S. Johansson, and M. Håkansson. 2003. Nostalgia: An Evocative Tangible Interface for Elderly Users. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '03). ACM, NY, USA, 964--965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Oritsland and J. Buur. 2000. Taking the Best from a Company History - Designing with Interaction Styles. In Proceedings of Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, NY, USA, 27--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. C. Park and A. H. Gutchess. 2000. Cognitive Aging and Everyday Life. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. I. Rodríguez, G. Cajamarca, V. Herskovic, C. Fuentes, and M. Campos. 2017. Helping Elderly Users Report Pain Levels: A Study of User Experience with Mobile and Wearable Interfaces. Mobile Information Systems 2017 (Nov 2017), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Wolfgang. 2011. Tangible Interfaces As a Chance for Higher Technology Acceptance by the Elderly. In Proceedings Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech '11). ACM, NY, USA, 311--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Ziat, H. Yao, R. Schmitt, and V. Hayward. 2016. FrontPanel: Tangible User Interface for Touch-Screens Dedicated to Elderly. In Proceedings Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, NY, USA, 3808--3811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Tangible Ways to Evaluate User Experience for Elders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader