skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025604acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CamRay: Camera Arrays Support Remote Collaboration on Wall-Sized Displays

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Remote collaboration across wall-sized displays creates a key challenge: how to support audio-video communication among users as they move in front of the display. We present CamRay, a platform that uses camera arrays embedded in wall-sized displays to capture video of users and present it on remote displays according to the users' positions. We investigate two settings: in Follow-Remote, the position of the video window follows the position of the remote user; in Follow-Local, the video window always appears in front of the local user. We report the results of a controlled experiment showing that with Follow-Remote, participants are faster, use more deictic instructions, interpret them more accurately, and use fewer words. However, some participants preferred the virtual face-to-face created by Follow-Local when checking for their partners' understanding. We conclude with design recommendations to support remote collaboration across wall-sized displays.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1731-file3.m4v

m4v

41.7 MB

pn1731p.mp4

mp4

2 MB

References

  1. Ignacio Avellino, Cédric Fleury, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2015. Accuracy of Deictic Gestures to Support Telepresence on Wall-sized Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2393--2396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Robert Ball, Chris North, and Doug A. Bowman. 2007. Move to Improve: Promoting Physical Navigation to Increase User Performance with Large Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Beck, A. Kunert, A. Kulik, and B. Froehlich. 2013. Immersive Group-to-Group Telepresence. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. (April 2013), 616--625. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.33 4. Sara A. Bly, Steve R. Harrison, and Susan Irwin. 1993. Media Spaces: Bringing People Together in a Video, Audio, and Computing Environment. Commun. ACM 36, 1 (Jan. 1993), 28--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nathan Bos, Judy Olson, Darren Gergle, Gary Olson, and Zach Wright. 2002. Effects of Four Computer-mediated Communications Channels on Trust Development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 135--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bill Buxton. 2009. Mediaspace -- Meaningspace -- Meetingspace. In Media Space 20 + Years of Mediated Life, Steve Harrison (Ed.). Springer, London, 217--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Milton Chen. 2002. Leveraging the Asymmetric Sensitivity of Eye Contact for Videoconference. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Herbert H. Clark and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 127--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbert H Clark and Catherine R Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Herbert H. Clark, Robert Schreuder, and Samuel Buttrick. 1983. Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 2 (April 1983), 245--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Dou, Y. Shi, J. M. Frahm, H. Fuchs, B. Mauchly, and M. Marathe. 2012. Room-sized informal telepresence system. In 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW). 15--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Darren Gergle, Robert E. Kraut, and Susan R. Fussell. 2004. Action As Language in a Shared Visual Space. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jörg Hauber, Holger Regenbrecht, Mark Billinghurst, and Andy Cockburn. 2006. Spatiality in Videoconferencing: Trade-offs Between Efficiency and Social Presence. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Keita Higuchi, Yinpeng Chen, Philip A. Chou, Zhengyou Zhang, and Zicheng Liu. 2015. ImmerseBoard: Immersive Telepresence Experience Using a Digital Whiteboard. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2383--2392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ellen A. Isaacs and John C. Tang. 1993. What Video Can and Can'T Do for Collaboration: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA '93). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hiroshi Ishii and Minoru Kobayashi. 1992. ClearBoard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 525--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Clemens N. Klokmose, James R. Eagan, Siemen Baader, Wendy Mackay, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2015. Webstrates: Shareable Dynamic Media. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 280--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, Katrin Wolf, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, Svenja Leifert, and Harald Reiterer. 2015. Using Space: Effect of Display Size on Users' Search Performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1845--1850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Can Liu, Olivier Chapuis, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Eric Lecolinet. 2016. Shared Interaction on a Wall-Sized Display in a Data Manipulation Task. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2075--2086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Can Liu, Olivier Chapuis, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Eric Lecolinet, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2014. Effects of Display Size and Navigation Type on a Classification Task. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4147--4156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paul K. Luff, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Christian Heath. 2015. Flexible Ecologies And Incongruent Locations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 877--886. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wendy E. Mackay. 1999. Media Spaces: Environments for multimedia interaction. In Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon (Ed.). Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 55--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrew F. Monk and Caroline Gale. 2002. A Look Is Worth a Thousand Words: Full Gaze Awareness in Video-Mediated Conversation. Discourse Processes 33, 3 (2002), 257--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. David T. Nguyen and John Canny. 2007. Multiview: Improving Trust in Group Video Conferencing Through Spatial Faithfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1465--1474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David T. Nguyen and John Canny. 2009. More Than Face-to-face: Empathy Effects of Video Framing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein. 2016. Modern Statistical Methods for HCI. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Abigail Sellen, Bill Buxton, and John Arnott. 1992. Using Spatial Cues to Improve Videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 651--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Anthony Tang, Michel Pahud, Kori Inkpen, Hrvoje Benko, John C. Tang, and Bill Buxton. 2010. Three's Company: Understanding Communication Channels in Three-way Distributed Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. John C. Tang and Scott Minneman. 1991. VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 315--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. John C. Tang and Scott L. Minneman. 1990. VideoDraw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Elizabeth S. Veinott, Judith Olson, Gary M. Olson, and Xiaolan Fu. 1999. Video Helps Remote Work: Speakers Who Need to Negotiate Common Ground Benefit from Seeing Each Other. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 302--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Malte Willert, Stephan Ohl, Anke Lehmann, and Oliver Staadt. 2010. The Extended Window Metaphor for Large High-resolution Displays. In Proceedings of the 16th Eurographics Conference on Virtual Environments & Second Joint Virtual Reality (EGVE - JVRC'10). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CamRay: Camera Arrays Support Remote Collaboration on Wall-Sized Displays

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader