skip to main content
10.1145/2967413.2967433acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D-IC: New Perspectives for a Digital Pixel Sensor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital Pixel Sensors (DPS) are often unsuitable in the standard market due to large pixel size and low Fill-Factor (FF) in spite of several advantages like an early conversion. Nevertheless, the digital pixel represents presages of the "smart" pixel integrating maximum of processing in pixel level. It's for this reason that a special attention should be paid in this one. An elegant solution to compensate for the disadvantages of the DPS is to use an emergent three-dimension integration technology. So in this paper, an explanation of the sensitivity of image sensor is done highlighting the role of the fill-factor on this characteristic. Then a description of a particular digital pixel is described as well as a brief overview of different three-dimension integration methods. The digital pixel includes a photodiode, a Delta-Sigma Modulation (DSM) and a digital decimation filter. Finally, this paper presents an approach which combines a 3D technology, the CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semi-conductor) 130nm 3D-IC FaStack Tezzaron technology, and the Multi-Channel-Bit-Serial (MCBS) method allowing the presented pixel to obtain a high fill-factor about 80% and a pixel pitch of 32.5μm.

References

  1. Orit Skorka and Dileepan Joseph. Cmos digital pixel sensors: technology and applications. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, pages 90600G--90600G. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ki-Won Lee, Yuki Ohara, K Kiyoyama, Shuji Konno, Yuuki Sato, Shigetaka Watanabe, A Yabata, Tomonari Kamada, J-C Bea, Hiroya Hashimoto, et al. Characterization of chip-level hetero-integration technology for high-speed, highly parallel 3d-stacked image processing system. In Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012 IEEE International, pages 33--2. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M Motoyoshi, H Nakamura, M Bonkohara, and M Koyanagi. Current and future 3d-lsi technology for image sensor devices. In Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., Proc, volume 1112, pages E01--03, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Orit Skorka and Dileepan Joseph. Design and fabrication of vertically-integrated cmos image sensors. Sensors, 11(5):4512--4538, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E Vilella, O Alonso, and A Dieguez. 3d integration of geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes aimed to very high fill-factor pixels for future linear colliders. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 731:103--108, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tarek Lulé, Stephan Benthien, Holger Keller, Frank Mütze, Peter Rieve, Konstantin Seibel, Michael Sommer, and Michael Bohm. Sensitivity of cmos based imagers and scaling perspectives. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, 47(11):2110--2122, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Abbas El Gamal and Helmy Eltoukhy. Cmos image sensors. Circuits and Devices Magazine, IEEE, 21(3):6--20, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kouji Kiyoyama, K-W Lee, Takafumi Fukushima, H Naganuma, H Kobayashi, Tetsu Tanaka, and Mitsumasa Koyanagi. A very low area adc for 3-d stacked cmos image processing system. In 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), 2011 IEEE International, pages 1--4. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N Brochard, J Nebhen, J Dubois, and D Ginhac. Design of a 3d-ic multi-resolution digital pixel sensor. In SPIE Photonics Europe, pages 989707--989707. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zeljko Ignjatovic and Mark F Bocko. A 0.88 nw/pixel, 99.6 db linear-dynamic-range fully-digital image sensor employing a pixel-level sigma-delta adc. In VLSI Circuits, 2006. Digest of Technical Papers. 2006 Symposium on, pages 23--24. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R Jacob Baker. CMOS: circuit design, layout, and simulation, volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Philip Garrou, Christopher Bower, and Peter Ramm. Handbook of 3d integration: volume 1-technology and applications of 3D integrated circuits. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Philip Garrou, Peter Ramm, and Mitsumasa Koyanagi. 3d ic integration since 2008. Handbook of 3D Integration: 3D Process Technology, pages 1--12, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jian-Qiang Lu, Ken Rose, and Susan Vitkavage. 3d integration: Why, what, who, when? Future Fab Int, 23(23):25--26, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robert S Patti. Three-dimensional integrated circuits and the future of system-on-chip designs. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(6):1214--1224, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ray Yarema, R Lipton, M Demarteau, A Shenai, T Zimmerman, J Hoff, D Christian, M Trimpl, and G Deptuch. 3d ic pixel electronics-the next challenge. Technical report, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kyungho Lee, JungChak Ahn, Bumsuk Kim, Taesub Jung, Sangjoo Lee, Moosup Lim, Chang-Rok Moon, Sangil Jung, Junetaeg Lee, Hongki Kim, et al. Snr performance comparison of 1.4 um pixel: Fsi, light-guide, and bsi. IISW2011, 3:2011, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zeljko Ignjatovic, Danijel Maricic, and Mark F Bocko. Low power, high dynamic range cmos image sensor employing pixel-level oversampling analog-to-digital conversion. Sensors Journal, IEEE, 12(4):737--746, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kiyoto Ito, Benjamas Tongprasit, and Tadashi Shibata. A computational digital pixel sensor featuring block-readout architecture for on-chip image processing. Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, IEEE Transactions on, 56(1):114--123, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Stuart Kleinfelder, Suk Hwan Lim, Xinqiao Liu, and Abbas El Gamal. A 10,000 frames/s 0.18 μm cmos digital pixel sensor with pixel-level memory. ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, pages 88--89, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alireza Mahmoodi, Jing Li, and Dileepan Joseph. Digital pixel sensor array with logarithmic delta-sigma architecture. Sensors, 13(8):10765--10782, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Christoph Posch, Daniel Matolin, and Rainer Wohlgenannt. A qvga 143 db dynamic range frame-free pwm image sensor with lossless pixel-level video compression and time-domain cds. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, 46(1):259--275, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jehyuk Rhee and Youngjoong Joo. Wide dynamic range cmos image sensor with pixel level adc. Electronics Letters, 39(4):1, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J Gerardo Rocha, Graça Minas, and S Lanceros-Mendez. Pixel readout circuit for x-ray imagers. Sensors Journal, IEEE, 10(11):1740--1745, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Xiuling Wang, Winnifred Wong, and Richard Hornsey. A high dynamic range cmos image sensor with in pixel light-to-frequency conversion. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 53(12):2988, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. 3D-IC: New Perspectives for a Digital Pixel Sensor

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDSC '16: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Distributed Smart Camera
      September 2016
      242 pages
      ISBN:9781450347860
      DOI:10.1145/2967413

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate92of117submissions,79%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader