skip to main content
10.1145/2910017.2910609acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

SERF: optimization of socially sourced images using psychovisual enhancements

Published:10 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online communities and social networks are the most popular sites on the Internet, and have exploded with multimedia content in the last decade. Most web designers recognize that site images can be saved with lower fidelity to reduce bandwidth consumption and increase capacity, though many are reluctant to do so for aesthetic concerns. However, there are many images that site designers have little direct control over---socially sourced images. Many social networks automatically reduce the fidelity of uploaded images in order to conserve bandwidth. Social networks also contain a vast archive of images with popularity indicators, such as likes and shares, which recent work has correlated with psychovisual features within the images. In this paper, we investigate the trade-off between fidelity reduction and selected psychovisual enhancements. We demonstrate that even simple enhancements can be used to enable more aggressive optimization of socially sourced content, which has implications for static content delivery networks and image servers. Through user testing on real images, we validate the efficacy of our proposed approach.

References

  1. Facebook. www.facebook.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Internet brands: vbulletin forum software. www.vbulletin.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. jquery, the write less, do more, javascript library. www.jquery.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Curalate insights: Analysis of instagram. http://blog.curalate.com/image-qualities-that-drive-likes-on-instagram, Nov. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wikipedia: Aol art image format. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ART_image_file_format, Dec. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexa top sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Curalate insights: Analysis of pinterest. http://blog.curalate.com/the-perfect-pinterest-pinhow-to-optimize-your-images-for-maximumengagement-on-pinterest, Jun. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Facebook newsroom. http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Facebook support: How can i make sure my photos display in the highest quality? https://www.facebook.com/help/www/266520536764594, Nov. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Quintly analytics: Which facebook post type rules the news feed? http://www.quintly.com/blog/2014/03/data-analysis-which-facebook-post-type-rules-the-news-feed/, Mar. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Webp: A new image format for the web. https://developers.google.com/speed/webp, March 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Beaver, S. Kumar, H. C. Li, J. Sobel, and P. Vajgel. Finding a needle in haystack: Facebook's photo storage. In USENIX OSDI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Brittain. Batch processing millions of images at etsy. https://codeascraft.com/2010/07/09/batch-processing-millions-of-images, Jul. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Cheng, L. A. Adamic, P. A. Dow, J. M. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. Can cascades be predicted? In 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, WWW '14, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 7-11, 2014, pages 925--936, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Ding, F. Huang, Z. Xie, Y. Wu, and L. Ma. A novel customized recompression framework for massive internet images. In Proceedings of the First Int'l Conf. on Computational Visual Media, CVM'12, pages 9--16, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. eMarketer Inc. emarketer: Facebook us ad revenues. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Facebooks-US-Ad-Revenues-Outpace-Users-Average-Daily-Time-Spent-on-Site/1011215, Sep. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Erman, V. Gopalakrishnan, R. Jana, and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Towards a spdy'ier mobile web? In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, CoNEXT '13, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Ernawan, N. A. Abu, and N. Suryana. A psychovisual threshold for generating quantization process in tchebichef moment image compression. JCP, 9(3):702--710, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries from jpeg ghosts. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 4(1), Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Google. Google auto enhance. http://gplusproject.appspot.com/auto-enhance/index.html, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Hass. Jpeg quantization tables. http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-quantization.html, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. Hass. Jpegsnoop - file decoding utility. http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-snoop.html, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. HTTPArchive. Tracking how the web is built. http://httparchive.org, Oct. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Huang, A. Wang, J. Li, and K. W. Ross. Measuring and evaluating large-scale cdns paper. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, IMC '08, pages 15--29. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. B. Kang, A. Kapoor, and D. Lischinski. Personalization of image enhancement. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on, pages 1799--1806, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. Khosla, A. D. Sarma, and R. Hamid. What makes an image popular? In 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, WWW '14, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 7-11, 2014, pages 867--876, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M.-C. Lee and S.-B. Cho. Interactive differential evolution for image enhancement application in smart phone. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 1--6, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R. K. Mantiuk, A. Tomaszewska, and R. Mantiuk. Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. Comp. Graph. Forum, 31(8), Dec. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Podjarny. Situational performance optimization - the next frontier. http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2012/situational-performance-optimization-the-next-frontier/, Dec. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. T. Shoham, D. Gill, and S. Carmel. A novel perceptual image quality measure for block based image compression. In Proceedings of SPIE, Image Quality and System Performance VIII. SPIE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. S. Stefanov. Web Performance Daybook. Oreilly and Associate Series. O'Reilly Media, Incorporated, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Traverso, K. Huguenin, I. Trestian, V. Erramilli, N. Laoutaris, and K. Papagiannaki. Tailgate: handling long-tail content with a little help from friends. In Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012, WWW 2012, Lyon, France, April 16-20, 2012, pages 151--160, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. X. S. Wang, A. Balasubramanian, A. Krishnamurthy, and D. Wetherall. How speedy is spdy? In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI 2014, Seattle, WA, USA, April 2-4, 2014, pages 387--399, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. M. P. Wittie, V. Pejovic, L. Deek, K. C. Almeroth, and B. Y. Zhao. Exploiting locality of interest in online social networks. In CoNEXT, page 25. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SERF: optimization of socially sourced images using psychovisual enhancements

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MMSys '16: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimedia Systems
        May 2016
        420 pages
        ISBN:9781450342971
        DOI:10.1145/2910017
        • General Chair:
        • Christian Timmerer

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 May 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MMSys '16 Paper Acceptance Rate20of71submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate176of530submissions,33%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader