Jiezhong Qiu
Qiang Yang
John E. Hopcroft
ABSTRACT
Social instant messaging services are emerging as a transformative form with which people connect, communicate with friends in their daily life they catalyze the formation of social groups, and they bring people stronger sense of community and connection. However, research community still knows little about the formation and evolution of groups in the context of social messaging their lifecycles, the change in their underlying structures over time, and the diffusion processes by which they develop new members. In this paper, we analyze the daily usage logs from WeChat group messaging platform the largest standalone messaging communication service in China with the goal of understanding the processes by which social messaging groups come together, grow new members, and evolve over time. Specifically, we discover a strong dichotomy among groups in terms of their lifecycle, and develop a separability model by taking into account a broad range of group-level features, showing that long-term and short-term groups are inherently distinct. We also found that the lifecycle of messaging groups is largely dependent on their social roles and functions in users' daily social experiences and specific purposes. Given the strong separability between the long-term and short-term groups, we further address the problem concerning the early prediction of successful communities. In addition to modeling the growth and evolution from group-level perspective, we investigate the individual-level attributes of group members and study the diffusion process by which groups gain new members. By considering members' historical engagement behavior as well as the local social network structure that they embedded in, we develop a membership cascade model and demonstrate the effectiveness by achieving AUC of 95.31% in predicting inviter, and an AUC of 98.66% in predicting invitee.
- WeChat group chat features. www.wechat.com/en/features.html#group.Google Scholar
- WeChat wiki. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeChat.Google Scholar
- E. Adar, L. Zhang, L. A. Adamic, and R. M. Lukose. Implicit structure and the dynamics of blogspace. In Workshop on the weblogging ecosystem, pages 16989--16995, 2004.Google Scholar
- A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, J. Leskovec, and M. Tiwari. Global diffusion via cascading invitations: Structure, growth, and homophily. In WWW, pages 66--76, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Aral, L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51):21544--21549, 2009. Google Scholar
- L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD, pages 44--54. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Bakshy, I. Rosenn, C. Marlow, and L. Adamic. The role of social networks in information diffusion. In WWW, pages 519--528, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Buntain and J. Golbeck. Identifying social roles in reddit using network structure. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion, pages 615--620. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. S. Butler. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information systems research, 12(4):346--362, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Cha, A. Mislove, B. Adams, and K. P. Gummadi. Characterizing social cascades in flickr. In Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks, pages 13--18, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Cheng, L. Adamic, P. A. Dow, J. M. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. Can cascades be predicted? In WWW, pages 925--936. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Church and R. de Oliveira. What's up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional sms. In Mobile-CHI, pages 352--361. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Ducheneaut, N. Yee, E. Nickell, and R. J. Moore. The life and death of online gaming communities: a look at guilds in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 839--848, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871--1874, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Girvan and M. E. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 99(12):7821--7826, 2002. Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Goel, A. Anderson, J. Hofman, and D. Watts. The structural virality of online diffusion. Preprint, 22:26, 2013.Google Scholar
- M. Gomez Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1019--1028. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 1971.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Hopcroft, O. Khan, B. Kulis, and B. Selman. Natural communities in large linked networks. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 541--546. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. R. Kairam, D. J. Wang, and J. Leskovec. The life and death of online groups: Predicting group growth and longevity. In WSDM, pages 673--682. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Kloumann, L. Adamic, J. Kleinberg, and S. Wu. The lifecycles of apps in a social ecosystem. In WWW, pages 581--591, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kubat, S. Matwin, et al. Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-sided selection. In ICML, volume 97, pages 179--186, 1997.Google Scholar
- H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW, pages 591--600. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 1(1):5, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Leskovec, M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. S. Glance, and M. Hurst. Patterns of cascading behavior in large blog graphs. In SDM, volume 7, pages 551--556. SIAM, 2007. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Li, K. He, D. Bindel, and J. E. Hopcroft. Uncovering the small community structure in large networks: A local spectral approach. In WWW, pages 658--668, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. Newman. Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 38(2):321--330, 2004. Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Palla, A.-L. Barabási, and T. Vicsek. Quantifying social group evolution. Nature, 446(7136):664--667, 2007. Google Scholar
- N. Park, K. F. Kee, and S. Valenzuela. Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6):729--733, 2009. Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Ribeiro. Modeling and predicting the growth and death of membership-based websites. In WWW, pages 653--664. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In WWW, pages 695--704. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Sun, I. Rosenn, C. Marlow, and T. M. Lento. Gesundheit! modeling contagion through facebook news feed. In ICWSM, 2009.Google Scholar
- Y. Sun, J. Tang, J. Han, C. Chen, and M. Gupta. Co-evolution of multi-typed objects in dynamic star networks. IEEE TKDE, 26(12):2942--2955, 2014. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ugander, L. Backstrom, C. Marlow, and J. Kleinberg. Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16):5962--5966, 2012. Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. J. Watts. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(9):5766--5771, 2002. Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Weng, F. Menczer, and Y.-Y. Ahn. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports, 3, 2013. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Yang, X. Wei, M. S. Ackerman, and L. A. Adamic. Activity lifespan: An analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In ICWSM, 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Lifecycle and Cascade of WeChat Social Messaging Groups
Recommendations
The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity
WSDM '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data miningWe pose a fundamental question in understanding how to identify and design successful communities: What factors predict whether a community will grow and survive in the long term? Social scientists have addressed this question extensively by analyzing ...
Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities
The motivation to share members' knowledge is critical to an online community's survival and success. Previous research has established that knowledge sharing intentions are based on group cohesion. Several studies also suggested that social loafing ...
Group Profiling for Understanding Social Structures
The prolific use of participatory Web and social networking sites is reshaping the ways in which people interact with one another. It has become a vital part of human social life in both the developed and developing world. People sharing certain ...
Comments