skip to main content
10.1145/2818567.2818600acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Problems in Replica Server Placement (RSP) over Content Delivery Networks (CDN)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Massive traffic generated by a huge number of requests is the major concern in today's web based world. Content Delivery Network (CDN) was evolved to cope up with this issue which is a popular research area in recent years. In CDN all the content are stored in a server which is known as the origin server. The major challenge in CDN is to place a number of mirror images i.e. replicas of the origin server at the edge of the Internet. In this paper a comparative analysis is performed on replica placement algorithms like Tree-based, Greedy, Random, HotSpot, HotZone as well as some recently evolved strategies like GeoIP, Flow Count, NetClust. In this paper we have formulated a problem and a comparative analysis on the above mentioned replica placement algorithms are performed based on complexity, optimization factors and their applicability. The comparison reveals that Greedy provides placement solution which is almost optimal but its complexity is a hindrance to its implementation. HotSpot becomes very popular from implementation point of view. Because of the reduced cross bandwidth traffic the Flow Count strategy attracts the video generating companies. NetClust proves its performance to be the best as its complexity, deployment cost and delay are lower than all other approaches discussed in this paper. The analysis indicates that though different approaches are having their own merits and demerits, but their use is application specific. Selection of replica placement approaches depends on the designer and the types of applications.

References

  1. H. Yin, X. Liu, G. Min, and C. Lin, "Content Delivery Networks: a Bridge between Emerging Applications and Future IP Networks," IEEE Network, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 52--56, July--August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Bartolini, E. Casalicchio, and S. Tucci, "A Walk Through Content Delivery Networks," In Proceedings of MASCOTS 2003, LNCS Vol. 2965/2004, pp. 1--25, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yudi Haribowo, Achmad Imam Kistijantoro, "Performance Analysis of Content-based Mobile Application on Content Delivery Networks", In Proceedings of International Conference on Cloud Computing and Social Networking (ICCCSN), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Muslim Elkotob, Karl Andersson, "Challenges and Opportunities in Content Distribution Networks: A Case Study", In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Mobility Management in the Networks of the Future World, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Stamos, G. Pallis, A. Vakali, and M. D. Dikaiakos, "Evaluating the utility of content delivery networks," In Proc. of the 4th UPGRADE-CN Workshop on Content Delivery and Management in Large-Scale Networks, ACM Press, NY, USA, Jun. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Vakali and G. Pallis, "Content delivery networks: Status and trends," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 68--74, Nov. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Pathan and R. Buyya, "A Taxonomy and Survey of Content Delivery Networks", Technical Report GRIDS-TR-2007-4, The Univ. of Melbourne, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Li, M. J. Golin, G. F. Ialiano, and X. Deng. On the Optimal Placement of Web Proxies in the Internet. In Proc. of INFOCOM'99, March 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lili Qiu; Padmanabhan, V. N.; Voelker, G. M., "On the placement of Web server replicas," INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, vol.3, no., pp.1587--1596 vol.3, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Szymaniak, M.; Pierre, G.; van Steen, M.;, "Latency-driven replica placement", Proceedings. The 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet, pp. 399--405, 31 Jan.--4 Feb. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Jamin, C. Jin, A. R. Kure, D. Raz, and Y. Shavitt, "Constrained Mirror Placement on the Internet," In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, April 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Yang, Z. Fei, "A Model for Replica Placement in Content Distribution Networks for Multimedia Applications", ICC 2003 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moises Rodrigues et al, "Optimizing cross traffic with an adaptive CDN replica placement strategy", ANSS 13, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Simulation Symposium, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jafari S. J., Naji H, "GeoIP clustering: Solving replica server placement problem in content delivery networks by clustering users according to their physical locations", Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H. Yin et al., "NetClust: A Framework for Scalable and Pareto-Optimal Media Server Placement," IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 15, no. 8, Dec. 2013, pp. 2114--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Torres et al., "Dissecting video server selection strategies in the youtube CDN," in Proc. 31st ICDCS, 2011, pp. 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. "Statistics-YouTube", https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. H. Al-Shayeji, S. Rajesh, M. Alsarraf, and R. Alsuwaid, "A Comparative Study on Replica Placement Algorithms for Content Delivery Networks," proc. Of IEEE Second International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control and Telecommunication Technologies, pp. 140--142, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nitin Rakesh and Vipin Tyagi, "Linear-code multicast on parallel architectures" Elsevier Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 42, pp. 1074--1088, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nitin Rakesh and Vipin Tyagi, "Efficient Broadcasting in Parallel Networks Using Network Coding", in Proceedings of The First International conference on Parallel, Distributed Computing technologies and Applications, CCIS 203, pp. 484--494, Springer-Verlag, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nitin Rakesh and Nitin, "Analysis of All to All Broadcast on Multi Mesh of Trees Using Genetic Algorithm" International Workshop on Advances in Computer Networks, VLSI, ANVIT, St. Petersbutg, Russia, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Problems in Replica Server Placement (RSP) over Content Delivery Networks (CDN)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCCT '15: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology 2015
        September 2015
        481 pages
        ISBN:9781450335522
        DOI:10.1145/2818567

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        © 2015 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 September 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader