skip to main content
10.1145/2814940.2814947acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Drone Agent to Support a Clean Environment

Published:21 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we introduce and evaluate a concept of a drone agent that can support us to keep the environment clean. The drone has four main functions: (1) find a waste item, (2) persuade the user to pick up the item, (3) lead the user to the nearest trash bin, (4) communicate with the user when the job is done. We prototyped three types of persuasion effects with the drone (Visual, Audio, and Visual+Audio) and evaluated them through an online study with eighty two participants. The results reveal that interest in the drone technology varied significantly between developed and developing countries, with individuals in developing countries having higher ratings for drone related persuasion, compliance, pleasantness and sensibility; gender differences also emerged. Finally, evaluation results led to many design recommendations that will increase the functionality and attractiveness and usage potential of the proposed technology.

References

  1. Abdullah Al Mahmud, Pavan Dadlani, Omar Mubin, Suleman Shahid, Cees Midden, and Oliver Moran. 2007. iParrot: towards designing a persuasive agent for energy conservation. In Persuasive Technology. Springer, 64--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abdullah Al Mahmud, Omar Mubin, Suleman Shahid, James F Juola, and Boris de Ruyter. 2008. EZ phone: persuading mobile users to conserve energy. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 2. British Computer Society, 7--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ernesto Arroyo, Leonardo Bonanni, and Ted Selker. 2005. Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 631--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Christoph Bartneck, Tatsuya Nomura, Takayuki Kanda, Tomohiro Suzuki, and K Kennsuke. 2005. A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. In HCI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ulrike Bruckenberger, Astrid Weiss, Nicole Mirnig, Ewald Strasser, Susanne Stadler, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. The good, the bad, the weird: Audience evaluation of a "Real" robot in relation to science fiction and mass media. In Social Robotics. Springer, 301--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rob Comber and Anja Thieme. 2013. Designing beyond habit: opening space for improved recycling and food waste behaviors through processes of persuasion, social influence and aversive affect. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 6 (2013), 1197--1210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Saskia Dantzig, Gijs Geleijnse, and Aart Tijmen Halteren. 2013. Toward a persuasive mobile application to reduce sedentary behavior. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 6 (2013), 1237--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Peter de Vries, Mirjam Galetzka, and Jan Gutteling. 2014. Persuasion in the Wild: Communication, Technology, and Event Safety. In Persuasive Technology. Springer, 80--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mark Dougherty. 2013. Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Blue Part 2: From Frankenstein to Battlefield Drones; A Perspective on Machine Ethics. Journal of Intelligent Systems 22, 1 (2013), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kerstin Fischer, Stephen Young, Brian Mok, Rohan Mareshwari, David Sirkin, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Initiating Interactions and Negotiating Approach: A Robotic Trash Can in the Field. In AAAI Symposium on Turn-taking and Coordination in Human-Machine Interaction. 10--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BJ Fogg, Gregory Cuellar, and David Danielson. 2009. Motivating, influencing, and persuading users: An introduction to captology. Human Computer Interaction Fundamentals (2009), 109--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel Friedenzohn and Alexander Mirot. 2014. The Fear of Drones: Privacy and Unmanned Aircraft. The Journal of Law Enforcement 3, 5 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaap Ham and Cees JH Midden. 2014. A persuasive robot to stimulate energy conservation: The influence of positive and negative social feedback and task similarity on energy-consumption behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics 6, 2 (2014), 163--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. SD IFR. 2012. World robotics survey. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Manja Lohse, Marc Hanheide, Britta Wrede, Michael L Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Anders Green, Helge Huttenrauch, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Gerhard Sagerer, and others. 2008. Evaluating extrovert and introvert behaviour of a domestic robot--a video study. In The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. IEEE, 488--493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cees Midden and Jaap Ham. 2009. Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology. ACM, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Brenda Miranda, Chimwemwe Jere, Olayan Alharbi, Sri Lakshmi, Yasser Khouja, and Samir Chatterjee. 2013. Examining the efficacy of a persuasive technology package in reducing texting and driving behavior. In Persuasive Technology. Springer, 137--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Florian 'Floyd' Mueller and Matthew Muirhead. 2015. Jogging with a Quadcopter. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2023--2032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kei Nitta, Keita Higuchi, and Jun Rekimoto. 2014. HoverBall: augmented sports with a flying ball. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Katharina Reinecke and Abraham Bernstein. 2013. Knowing what a user likes: A design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. Mis Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 427--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Anja Thieme, Rob Comber, Julia Miebach, Jack Weeden, Nicole Kraemer, Shaun Lawson, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. We've bin watching you: designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2337--2346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joel West and Michael Mace. 2010. Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple's iPhone. Telecommunications Policy 34, 5 (2010), 270--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yuto Yamaji, Taisuke Miyake, Yuta Yoshiike, P Ravindra S De Silva, and Michio Okada. 2011. Stb: Child-dependent sociable trash box. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 4 (2011), 359--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Drone Agent to Support a Clean Environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '15: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
      October 2015
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450335270
      DOI:10.1145/2814940

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader