skip to main content
research-article

A Strategic Roadmap for Navigating Academic-Industry Collaborations in Information Systems Research: Avoiding Rigor Mortis

Published:09 July 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Research collaboration between industry and academia remains challenging despite progress being made on a number of fronts. We are not implying that all information systems researchers should be engaging in industry collaborations, nor should the value of critique and work exclusively addressing academic and other audiences be viewed as less valuable than those engaging industry. The intent is instead to encourage more industry collaboration, and for those considering such initiatives to roadmap the activities strategically giving consideration to the full range of activities required so reasonable tradeoffs can be made in the context of building longer-term sustainable relationships.

We develop a roadmap from literature that organizes the building blocks (component activities) needed to plan and implement strategic academic-industry collaborations over longer time horizons. Specifically, we identify the key themes or layers of (1) Strategic Business Problem(s), (2) Governance, (3) Funding Criteria, (4) Privacy, Security and Ethics, (5) Intellectual Property, (6) Research Design and (7) Recognized Outputs, which need to be in place if you are to succeed with academic-industry research.

The roadmap framework highlights the need to consider the implications of the components across each of the layers at a particular point in time (vertical slice), the relationship between layers (dependencies) and the need for aligning the various activities in a coordinated manner; otherwise success at one layer is often undermined by a lack of awareness or failure at another layer.

Our hope is that these themes (layers) facilitate organizing this collaboration in a systematic and coordinated manner to produce academic-industry collaborations that progressively improve over time.

References

  1. Aldhouse, F. G. B. 199 "EC Data Privacy Legislation," Computer Fraud & Security Bulletin, October, pp. 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, L. M., and King, J. L. 1999. "Rigor and Relevance: Careers on the Line," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 17--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ARPA, Advanced Research Projects Agency. 2007. http://www.c2es.org/publications/advanced-research-projects-agency-energy-arpa-e-innovation, accessed May 5, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckhard, R.F. and Harris, R.T. 1987. Organizational Transitions: Managing complex change, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. 1999. "Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp 3--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berner, E. S., Detmer, D. E., et al. 2005. "Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States," Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (12:1), pp. 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhandari M., Busse, J.W., Jackowski, D., Montori, V.M., Schünemann, H., Sprague, S., Mears, D., Schemitsch, E.H., Heels-Ansdell, D., and Devereaux P.J. 2004. "Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials", Canadian Medical Assoication Journal, (170)4, pp. 477--480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridges, W. 1991. Managing Transitions, Reading, MA: Perseus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown and Becker, "Academic/Practitioner Partnerships," AMCIS, 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulloch, R.J. and Huczynski, A. 1985. Organizational Behaviour, London: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, E. and Green, M. 2012. Making Sense of Change Management 3rd Ed., London: KoganPage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carnall, C.A. 1990. Managing Change in Organizations, London: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Canadian Foundation for Innovation. 2013. "SSHRC has championed publication infrastructure initiatives funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, such as the Synergies platform?" http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/about-au_sujet/policies-politiques/open_access-libre_acces/index-eng.aspx accessed may 17, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Canadian Tri-Council Knowledge Mobilization. 2013. "Open Access. Interagency Collaboration". http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/about-au_sujet/policies-politiques/open_access-libre_acces/index-eng.aspx accessed May 17, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. CAUT Bulletin. 2012. "York Scraps CIGI Deal," Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) Bulletin (59:4), pp. A7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. CHSRF. 2012. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation Commissioned Research, http://www.chsrf.ca/Home.aspx, accessed June 12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Claryssea, B., Wrightb, M., et al. 2005. "Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions," Journal of Business Venturing (20), pp. 183--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Davenport, T. H., and Markus, M. L. 1999. "Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Bennasat and Zmud," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 19--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Desouza, K. C., El Sawy, O. A., et al. 2006. "Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research That Really Matters," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (17:1), pp. 341--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., et al. (2006). "The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'," Research Policy (35), pp. 1450--1464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Fällman, D., and Grönlund, A. k. 2002. "Rigor and Relevance Remodeled," Proceedings of IRIS25: Information Systems Research in Scandinavia, Bautahoj, Denmark, August 10--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson, C., Klocker, N. 2004. Academic publishing as 'creative' industry, some recent discourses of 'creative economies': some critical reflections" Area, Royal Geographical Society, Wiley on-line library. (36)4, pp. 423--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 2009, http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/, accessed May 5, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act 2009, http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/hitech-act-0, accessed May 5, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Healy, D., and Thase, M.E.. 2003. "Is academic psychiatry for sale?". The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182. PP 388--390. doi: 10.1192/bjp.MaydebGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Holt, D., Mackay, D. and Smith. R. 2003. "Developing Professional Expertise in the Knowledge Economy: Integrating Industry-Based learning with the Academic Curriculum in the Field of Information Technology". Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. (5)2. pp. 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ISO Information Security Standard (2012) for business information managment practices, http://www.articsoft.com/iso17799.htm, accessed May 8, 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, L., Robinson, S., and Lockett, N. 2010. "Recognising "open innovation" in HEI-industry intereaction for knowledge transfer and exchange, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, (16)6, pp. 540--560. ISSN: 1355--2554.Kavan, C. B. 1998. "Profit through Knowledge: The Application of Academic Research to Information Technology Organizations," Information Resources Management Journal (11:1), pp. 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kotter, J.P. 1995. "Leading change: why transformation efforts fail," Harvard Business Review (73:2), pp. 59--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanamäki, A., Stendal, K, and Thapa, D. (2011) "Mutual Informing Between IS Academia and Practice: Insights from KIWISR-5," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (29)7. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol29/iss1/7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, A. S. 1999. "Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyond the Approach of Positivism Alone," MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 29--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., et al. 2005. "The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications," Research Policy (34), pp. 981--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lyytinen, K. 1999. "Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research." MIS Quarterly (23:1), pp. 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mathiassen, L., Chiasson, M. and Germonprez, M. (2012). "Style Composition in Action Research Publication," Management Information Systems Quarterly, (24:4), pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. McCubbin, C. N. 2006, "Legal and ethico-legal issues in e-healthcare research projects in the UK", Social Science & Medicine (62), pp. 2768--2773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Medical Devices Class II law, 2013, Health Canada, http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/compli-conform/licences/directives/gui-0016-eng.php , Accessed May 5, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. MITACS. 2013. "In partnership with companies, government and academia," http://www.mitacs.ca/, accessed May 17, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadler, D.A. and Tushman, M.L. 1997. In (ed) M.B. Nadler, Competing by Design: The power of organizational architecture, New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. NSERC 2013. "The face of innovation is changing... to collaboration between public and private sector, and between colleges, universities and companies". Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp, accessed May 17, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. NSF. 2012. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/ , accessed June 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Oxley, J.E. (1999). "Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 38, Issue 3, 1 March 1999, Pages 283--309, ISSN 0167-2681, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00011-6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Pearlson, K.E., and Saunders, C.S. 2013. Managing and Using Information Systems -- A Strategic Approach, 5th Ed., New York: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Pertuze, J.A., Calder, E.S., Greitzer, E.M., and Lucas, W.A. 2010. "Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration," MIT Sloan Management Review (51:4), Summer, pp. 83--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Piasano, G.P. 2010. "The evolution of science-based business: innovating how we innovate", Industrial and Corporate Change, (19)2. Pp. 465--482. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Pavitt, K. 2001. "Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice?". Industrial and Corporate Change, (10)3. pp. 761--779. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.3.761Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Robey, D., and Markus, M. L. 1998. "Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems," Information Resources Management Journal (11:1), pp. 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Rosemann, M., and Vessey, I. 2008. "Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks," MIS Quarterly (32:1), pp. 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Saunders, C. 1998. "The Role of Business in IT Research: Editorial Preface," Information Resources Management Journal (11:1), pp. 4--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Spinesi, L. 2013. "Academic and industrial R&D: are they always complementary? A theoretical approach". Oxford Economic Papers, 65. pp. 147--172. doi:10.1093/oep/gps024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Senn, J. 1998. "The Challenge of Relating IS Research to Practice," Information Resources Management Journal (11:1), pp. 23--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Shaw, P. 2002. Changing Conversations in Organizations, London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. SSHRC-PDG. 2012., Partnership Development Grants. http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/partnership_development_grants-bourses_partenariat_developpement-eng.aspx, accessed June 12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Stacey, R.D. 2001. Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and knowledge creation, London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Tedesco, T. 2012. "Influence U," Financial Post, Saturday, March 10, pp. FP6--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). 2014. Medical Device Comprehensive Regulatory Assistance, Accessed March 20, 2014 http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/overview/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. "Engaged Scholarship: Creating Knowledge for Science and Practice," Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Vincent-Lancrin, S. 2006. "What is Changing in Academic Research? Trends and Futures Scenarios," European Journal of Education (41:2), pp. 169--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Zhao, M. (2006). "Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection", Management Science, Volume 52 Issue 8, August Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0516 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Strategic Roadmap for Navigating Academic-Industry Collaborations in Information Systems Research: Avoiding Rigor Mortis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
          ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 46, Issue 3
          August 2015
          65 pages
          ISSN:0095-0033
          EISSN:1532-0936
          DOI:10.1145/2804075
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 July 2015

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader