skip to main content
10.1145/2756406.2756950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

User and Topical Factors in Perceived Self-Efficacy of Video Digital Libraries

Published:21 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

A survey measured users' perceived self-efficacy about interactively retrieving digital video, both overall and according to different factors potentially related to user confidence preceding an actual video search session. A total of 270 surveys, with quantifiable responses, were collected and analyzed. T-tests and correlation tests produced significant findings about users' levels of perceived self-efficacy, including associations with topic familiarly, type or nature of the information need, and system context. Findings give researchers a better understanding of users' confidence and preconceptions prior to interactive information retrieval (IIR) sessions for video, providing valuable insight about users' attitudes which can be used to promote initial and continued use of interactive tools like digital libraries.

References

  1. Albertson, D. 2013. An interaction and interface design framework for video digital libraries. J. Doc. 69 (5), 667--692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Albertson, D. & Ju, B. 2015. Design criteria for video digital libraries: Categories of important features emerging from users' responses. Online Info. Rev., 39(2), 214--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Conniss, L. R., Ashford, A. J., & Graham, M. E. (2000). Information Seeking Behaviour in Image Retrieval: Visor I Final Report. University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Trading Services, Newcastle, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MISQ, 13 (3): 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Delcourt, M. and Kinzie, M. 1993. Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. J. Res. and Dev. in Ed., 27(1), 35--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill, T., Smith, N.D., and Mann, M.F. 1987. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. J. Applied Psyc., 72(2), 307--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Karsten, R. and Roth, M.R. 1998. The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. J. Res. on Tech. Ed., 31(1), 14--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurbanoglu, S.S. 2003. Self-efficacy: A concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. J. Doc., 59(6), 635--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mansourian, Y. and Ford, N. 2007. Web searchers' attributions of success and failure: An empirical study. J. Doc., 63(5), 659--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Marchionini, G., Wildemuth, B.M., and Geisler, G. 2006. The open video digital library: A möbius strip of research and practice. JASIS&T, 57 (12), 1629--1643. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nahl, D. 1996. Affective monitoring of Internet learners: Perceived self-efficacy and success. In S. Hardin (Ed.) Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (Baltimore, MD, October 21-24, 1996. Information Today, Medford, NJ. pp. 100--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ren, W.H. 1999. Self-efficacy and the search for government information: A study of small-business executives. RUSQ, 38(3), 283--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wildemuth, B. M., Marchionini, G., Yang, M., Geisler, G., Wilkens, T., Hughes, A., and Gruss, R. 2003. How fast is too fast?: Evaluating fast forward surrogates for digital video In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Houston, TX, May 27--31, 2003) ACM, New York, pp. 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User and Topical Factors in Perceived Self-Efficacy of Video Digital Libraries

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            JCDL '15: Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
            June 2015
            324 pages
            ISBN:9781450335942
            DOI:10.1145/2756406
            • General Chairs:
            • Paul Logasa Bogen,
            • Suzie Allard,
            • Holly Mercer,
            • Micah Beck,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Sally Jo Cunningham,
            • Dion Goh,
            • Geneva Henry

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 June 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            JCDL '15 Paper Acceptance Rate18of60submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader