skip to main content
10.1145/2691195.2691214acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opening the local: full disclosure policy and its impact on local governments in the Philippines

Published:27 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the Philippine government required local government units (LGUs) to post financial and procurement--related information in LGU websites. This research investigates whether this initiative has affected both the providers of the information and its supposed audience -- the public, as represented by citizen groups. To answer the questions, the researchers made use of a case study approach by selecting three provinces as research sites which yielded two major findings. On the supply side, incentivising openness is a critical aspect in ensuring that local governments have the interest to disclose financial data. However, on the demand side, there is limited awareness on the part of the public, and more particularly the intermediaries (e.g. business groups, civil society organizations, research institutions), on the availability of data, and thus, its limited use. This paper argues that openness is not just about governments putting meaningful government data out into the public domain, but also about making the public meaningfully engage with governments. This requires policies that will require observance of open government data standards and a capacity building process of ensuring that the public, to whom the data is intended, are aware and able to use the data in ensuring more transparent and accountable governance.

References

  1. Alampay, E. 2007. Incorporating Citizen Participation in the Philippines' e-LGU Project. Available at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/unpan/unpan034698.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank. 1999. A Study of NGOs: Philippines. ADB: ManilaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Azfar, O., Gurgur, T., Kähkönen, S., Lanyi, A., and Meagher, P. 2000. Decentralization and Governance: An Empirical Investigation of Public Service Delivery in the Philippines. IRIS Center: USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadband Commission. 2013. The State of Broadband: Universalising Broadband 2013. Available at http://www.broadbandcommission.org/Documents/bb-annualreport2013.pdf. Accessed on 28 November 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Conradie, P. and Choenni, S. 2012. Exploring Process Barriers to Release Public Sector Information in Local Governments. In 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Conference Proceedings. Gil-Garcia, R., Helbig, N. and Ojo, E. Ed. Pg. 5--13. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2463728&CFID=307792690&CFTOKEN=80759885. Accessed on 12 January 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Davies, T. (2013). Open Data Barometer: 2013 Global Report (pp. 1--45). Available at http://www.opendataresearch.org/dl/odb2013/Open-Data-Barometer-2013-Global-Report.pdf. Accessed June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Interior and Local Government. 2010. Memorandum Circular 2010 -- 083. Series of 2010. Dated 31 August 2010. Photocopy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fabros, A. 2002. "Civil Engagements in Local Governance: The Case of the Philippines." Citizen Participation in Local Governance: Experiences from Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Ed. Joel Rocamora. Logolink: Brighton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gurstein, M. 2011. Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data Use for Everyone?. First Monday. 16:2. Available at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3316/2764. Accessed on December 12, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Helbig, N., Cresswell, A., Burke, G. B., and Luna-Reyes, L. 2012. The Dynamics of Opening Government Data. The Research Foundation of the State University of New York. Available at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/opendata/opendata.pdf. Accessed on 6 January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hogge, B. 2010. Open Data Study: New Technologies. Transparency and Accountability Initiative: London. Available at http://www.transparency-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/open_data_study_final1.pdf. Accessed on 27 January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Iglesias, G. 2010. E-government initiatives in four Philippine Cities. PIDS Working Paper. 2010--22. Available at http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1022.pdf. Accessed on 12 January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Iszatt, Nina. "Legislating for Citizen's Participation in the Philippines." Citizen Participation in Local Governance: Experiences from Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Ed. Joel Rocamora. Logolink: Brighton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., and Zuiderwijk, A. 2012. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management (ISM). 29:4. 258--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lallana, E., Pascual, P. and Soriano, E. 2001. E-Government in the Philippines: Benchmarking Against Global Best Practices. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies. 17(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, S. and Estefan, F. 2014. Open Financial Data: Demand, Capacity, and Citizen Engagement. Available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x87IuHMMz9Gxo43lTBCP6G6EB6YVN90DUBWlfbG2GQA/edit. Accessed on 12 March 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, J. and Kim, S. 2012. E-Participation in an Era of Web 2.0: Factors Affective Citizens' Active Participation in Local Governance. In 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Conference Proceedings. Gil-Garcia, R., Helbig, N. and Ojo, E. Ed. Pg. 44--47. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2463728&CFID=307792690&CFTOKEN=80759885. Accessed on 12 January 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lieberman, E. Posner, D. and Tsai, L. 2013. Does Information Lead to More Active Citizenship: Evidence from an Education Intervention in Rural Kenya. MIT Political Science Department Working Paper 2013-2. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2228900. Accessed on 16 December 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nierras, R. M. 2005. "Citizen Participation in Financing Local Development: The Case of Bohol Water Utilities, Inc." Brighton: Logolink. Photocopied.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ocampo, M. 2001. NGO-GO Collaboration In Poverty Alleviation: The Case of Oriental Mindoro Province, Philippines. Research paper presented on Local Government Capability Building and Poverty Alleviation Policies Within the Framework of Decentralization: The Case of Philippines and Indonesia, at the Graduate School in International Development (GSID), Nagoya University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Peled, A. 2011. When Transparency and Collaboration Collide: The USA Open Data Program. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 26:11. 2085--2094 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Quizon, A. 2005. Engaging Communities: Moving from Advocacy to Affirmative Action -- Two NGO Cases from the Philippines. Paper delivered during the International Conference on Engaging Communities. August 14--17, 2005. Queensland, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Scassa, T. 2014. Privacy and Open Government. Future Internet. 6:2. 397--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Siar, S. 2005. E-governance at the local government level in the Philippines: an assessment of city government websites. Philippine Journal of Development. No. 60. 13:2. 135--168Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shkabatur, J. 2013. Towards Open Government for Enhanced Social Accountability. How to Notes. World Bank Institute. Draft document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tuano, P. 2011. Philippine Non-Government Organizations (NGOs): Contributions, Capacities, Challenges. In Yu Jose, L. Ed. Civil Society Organizations in the Philippines, A Mapping and Strategic Assessment. Civil Society Resources Institution: Quezon City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations. 2004. Global E-Government Readiness 2004. UN: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations. 2014. United Nations E-Government Survey 2014. United Nations: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Villarin, T. 1996. People Empowerment: A Guide to NGO-PO Partnership with Local Governments. Kaisahan Tungo sa Kaunlaran ng Kayanunan at Repormang Pansakahan: Quezon City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. World Bank. 2014. Open Data Readiness Assessment Tool. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/about/open-government-data-toolkit/readiness-assessment-tool. Accessed on 21 January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Websites: Philippine Government Data Portal -- http://www.data.gov.ph Full Disclosure Policy Portal - http://www.fdpp.blgs.gov.ph/ Provincial Government of Bohol -- http://www.bohol.gov.ph/ Provincial Government of Bulacan -- http://www.bulacan.gov.ph/ Provincial Government of South Cotabato -- http://www.southcotabato.gov.ph/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Opening the local: full disclosure policy and its impact on local governments in the Philippines

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICEGOV '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
          October 2014
          563 pages
          ISBN:9781605586113
          DOI:10.1145/2691195

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ICEGOV '14 Paper Acceptance Rate30of73submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader