skip to main content
10.1145/2666642.2666646acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Study on Participant-controlled Eye Tracker Calibration Procedure

Published:16 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The analysis of an eye movement signal, which can reveal o lot of information about the way human brain works, has recently attracted the attention of many researchers. The basis for such studies is data returned by specialized devices called eye-trackers. The first step of their usage is a calibration process, allowing to reflect an eye position to a point of regard. The main research problem analyzed in this paper is to check whether and how the chosen calibration scenario influences the calibration result (calibration errors). Based on this analysis of possible scenarios, a new user-controlled calibration procedure was developed. It was checked and compared with a classic approach during pilot studies using the Eye Tribe system as an eye-tracker device. The results obtained for both methods were examined in terms of provided accuracy.

References

  1. Duchowski, Andrew. Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Vol. 373. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, N., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hansen, D. W. and Ji, Q. 2010. In the eye of the beholder: A survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(3), 478--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kasprowski, P., Harezlak, K., Stasch, M.: Guidelines for the Eye Tracker Calibration Using Points of Regard. Information Technologies in Biomedicine. Volume 4. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing, Vol. 284, pp. 225--236, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Salvucci, D. D., & Goldberg, J. H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 Symposiumon Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 71--78). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, K., van de Weijer, J.: The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eyetracking data quality. Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):272--88. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0247-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hornof, A. J., & Halverson, T. Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4), 592--604, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Study on Participant-controlled Eye Tracker Calibration Procedure

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GazeIn '14: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction: Eye-Gaze & Multimodality
        November 2014
        50 pages
        ISBN:9781450301251
        DOI:10.1145/2666642

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        GazeIn '14 Paper Acceptance Rate8of8submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate19of21submissions,90%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader