skip to main content
10.1145/2513383.2513434acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Safe walking technology for people with dementia: what do they want?

Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an attempt to understand how safe walking technology can be designed to fit the needs of people with dementia. Taking inspiration from modern dementia care philosophy, and its emphasis on the individual with dementia, we have performed in-depth investigations of three persons' experiences of living with early-stage dementia. From interviews and co-design workshops with them and their family caregivers, we identified several factors that influence people with dementia's attitudes toward safe walking technology, and how they want the technology to assist them. Relevant factors include: The desire for control and self-management, the subjective experiences of symptoms, personal routines and skills, empathy for care-givers, and the local environment in which they live. Based on these findings, we argue there is a need to reconsider "surveillance" as a concept on which to base design of safe walking technology. We also discuss implications for design ethics.

References

  1. Astell, A. et al. 2008. Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: some methodological considerations. Universal Access in the Information Society. 8, 1, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Astell, A. 2006. Technology and personhood in dementia care. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 7, 1, 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baldwin, C. 2005. Technology, Dementia and Ethics: Rethinking the Issues. Disability Studies Quarterly. 25, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brandt, E. and Pope, A. 1997. Models of disability and rehabilitation. Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering (1997), 62--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, W. C. 2008. CATPro: context-aware task prompting system with multiple modalities for individuals with cognitive impairments. Proc. of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - Assets '08 (Halifax, Canada, 2008), 301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dahl, Y. and Holbø, K. 2012. Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care. Proc. of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 572--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Epp, T. D. 2003. Person-centred dementia care: A vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review. 5, 3, 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Essén, A. 2008. The two facets of electronic care surveillance: An exploration of the views of older people who live with monitoring devices. Soc Sci Med. 67, 1, 128--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Green, R. C. 2004. Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Professional Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurley, K. and Norcio, A. F. 2009. A Systematic Review of Technologies Designed to Improve and Assist Cognitive Decline for Both the Current and Future Aging Populations. Internationalization, Design and Global Development. N. Aykin, ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 156--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hawkey, K. et al. 2005. Requirements gathering with alzheimer's patients and caregivers. Proceedings of the 7th int. ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005), 142--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hughes, J. C. and Louw, S. J. 2002. Electronic tagging of people with dementia who wander. BMJ. 325, 7369, 847--848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Johnson, J. and Henderson, A. 2002. Conceptual models: begin by designing what to design. Interactions. 9, 1, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kitwood, T. 1997. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Adult Lives: A Life Course Perspective. The Policy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Landau, R. et al. 2011. Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia? Aging Ment Health. 15, 1 (2011), 78--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lauriks, S. et al. 2007. Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev. 6, 3, 223--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lindsay, S. et al. 2012. Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. Proc. of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Meiland, F. et al. 2010. Identifying User Needs and the Participative Design Process. Supporting People with Dementia Using Pervasive Health Technologies., 79--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Müller, C. et al. 2010. Dealing with wandering: a case study on caregivers' attitudes towards privacy and autonomy when reflecting the use of LBS. Proc. of the 16th ACM int. conference on Supporting group work (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Orpwood, R. et al. 2004. User Involvement in Dementia Product Development. Dementia. 3, 3, 263--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Prince, M. and Jackson, J. 2009. World Alzheimer Report 2009. Alzheimer's Disease International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Robinson, L. et al. 2007. Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspectives in the management of wandering in dementia. Health, Risk & Society. 9, 4, 389--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Robinson, L. et al. 2009. Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) Project: Developing Assistive Technologies with People with Dementia and Their Carers to Promote Independence. Int Psychogeriatr. 21, 03, 494--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Span, M. et al. 2013. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 12, 2, 535--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Yuce, Y. K. et al. 2012. An alternative approach to overcome ethical issues of geotracking patients with Alzheimer's disease. 2012 7th Int. Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics (HIBIT), 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Safe walking technology for people with dementia: what do they want?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ASSETS '13: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
            October 2013
            343 pages
            ISBN:9781450324052
            DOI:10.1145/2513383

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 October 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ASSETS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate28of98submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader