skip to main content
10.1145/2509558.2509566acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mining rules to align knowledge bases

Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Semantic Web has made huge progress in the last decade, and now comprises hundreds of knowledge bases (KBs). The Linked Open Data cloud connects the KBs in this Web of data. However, the links between the KBs are mostly concerned with the instances, not with the schema. Aligning the schemas is not easy, because the KBs may differ not just in their names for relations and classes, but also in their inherent structure. Therefore, we argue in this paper that advanced schema alignment is needed to tie the Semantic Web together. We put forward a particularly simple approach to illustrate how that might look.

References

  1. S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. G. Ives. DBpedia: A nucleus for a Web of open data. In ISWC, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Aumueller, H. H. Do, S. Massmann, and E. Rahm. Schema and ontology matching with coma++. In SIGMOD, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Böhm, G. de Melo, F. Naumann, and G. Weikum. Linda: distributed web-of-data-scale entity matching. In CIKM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Cali, T. Lukasiewicz, L. Predoiu, and H. Stuckenschmidt. Rule-based approaches for representing probabilistic ontology mappings. In URSW (LNCS Vol.), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Carlson, J. Betteridge, B. Kisiel, B. Settles, E. R. H. Jr., and T. M. Mitchell. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In AAAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. F. Cruz, F. P. Antonelli, and C. Stroe. Agreementmaker: Efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. PVLDB, 2(2), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. David, F. Guillet, and H. Briand. Association rule ontology matching approach. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 3(2), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Dehaspe and H. Toivonen. Discovery of frequent datalog patterns. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 3(1), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. O. Etzioni, M. J. Cafarella, D. Downey, S. Kok, A.-M. Popescu, T. Shaked, S. Soderland, D. S. Weld, and A. Yates. Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results). In WWW, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Gal--arraga, C. Teflioudi, K. Hose, and F. M. Suchanek. Amie: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Hartung, A. Gro', and E. Rahm. Conto-diff: generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. J. of Biomedical Informatics, 46(1), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Jain, P. Hitzler, A. P. Sheth, K. Verma, and P. Z. Yeh. Ontology alignment for linked open data. In ISWC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Lacoste-Julien, K. Palla, A. Davies, G. Kasneci, T. Graepel, and Z. Ghahramani. Sigma: Simple greedy matching for aligning large knowledge bases. In KDD, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. http://linkeddata.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Madhavan, P. A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching with cupid. In VLDB, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. J. Miller, L. M. Haas, and M. A. Hern--andez. Schema mapping as query discovery. In VLDB, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Muggleton. Learning from positive data. In Inductive Logic Programming Workshop, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Seligman, P. Mork, A. Y. Halevy, K. P. Smith, M. J. Carey, K. Chen, C. Wolf, J. Madhavan, A. Kannan, and D. Burdick. Openii: an open source information integration toolkit. In SIGMOD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. M. Suchanek, S. Abiteboul, and P. Senellart. Paris: Probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. PVLDB, 5(3), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Tatsiopoulos and B. Boutsinas. Ontology mapping based on association rule mining. In ICEIS (3), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Technologies. The freebase project. http://freebase.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. O. Udrea, L. Getoor, and R. J. Miller. Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration. In SIGMOD, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. http://www.w3.org/RDF/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mining rules to align knowledge bases

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AKBC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 workshop on Automated knowledge base construction
      October 2013
      124 pages
      ISBN:9781450324113
      DOI:10.1145/2509558

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      AKBC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate9of19submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate9of19submissions,47%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader