Abstract
In previous articles, we have described the range of methods available if you want to evaluate a software engineering method/tool and the criteria you need to consider to select a method appropriate to your individual circumstances. In future articles we will describe some guidelines to help you perform quantitative case studies and feature analysis. However, in this article we would like to review some of the human factors issues that can affect an evaluation exercise.
- [1] H.M. Parsons. What happened at Hawthorne? Science 183, pp. 922-932, March 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Evaluating software engineering methods and tool—part 4: the influence of human factors
Recommendations
Evaluating software engineering methods and tool—part 2: selecting an appropriate evaluation method—technical criteria
In the previous article about the DESMET evaluation methodology, I identified nine different types of evaluation:1. Quantitative Experiments2. Quantitative Case Studies3. Quantitative Surveys4. Feature Analysis---Screening mode5. Feature Analysis---Case ...
Evaluating software engineering methods and tool part 5: the influence of human factors
In previous articles, we have considered a number of general issues concerned with evaluating methods and tools. In the next few articles we describe how to perform a specific type of evaluation exercise called Feature Analysis.This article discusses ...
Evaluating software engineering methods and tools: part 9: quantitative case study methodology
This article is the first of three articles describing how to undertake a quantitative case study based on work done as part of the DESMET project [1], [2]. In the context of methods and tool evaluations, case studies are a means of evaluating methods ...
Comments