skip to main content
article
Free Access

Identifying and testing of signatures for non-volatile biomolecules using tandem mass spectra

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 1995Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Identification of volatile and semi-volatile molecules using traditional electron ionization mass spectrometry has been successful. The major contributor to this success is the reproduceability of the mass spectra, which allow identification of components based on comparison of fragmentation patterns within very large databases. However, this approach is not useful for the identification of typical nonvolatile biomolecules. Tandem mass spectrometry with collision induced dissociation (CID) has the potential to provide structure-specific fragmentation from non-volatile biomolecules.The recognition of these molecules based on CID is not an easy task, since the spectra generated for a given molecule are not as reproducible as in traditional electron ionization mass spectrometry. Also, the rules governing the formation of CID produced ions are not completely understood.In this study we investigate the use of the Kohonen Self-Organized Mapping (SOM) neural network to generate and test signatures (fragmentation patterns) for a given set of non-volatile biomolecules using spectra generated by tandem mass spectrometry with CID. The signatures then may be used as a discriminator for identifying unknown non-volatile biomolecules.

References

  1. 1- McLaffuty F. W., Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 2nd Ed., W. A. Binjanin Inc., Reading MA, pp. 201-202, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2- Bryant M. S., Lay, Jr. J. O., and Chiarelli M. P., Development of Fast Atom Bombardment Mass Spectral Methods for the Identification of Carcinogen- Nucleoside Adducts, The Journal of American Society for Mass Spectrometry, No. 3, pp: 360-371, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3- Bryant M. S., Freeman J. P., Lay, Jr. J. O., Proceedings of The 38th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Tuscan, AZ, pp: 962-963, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4- Zurada J. M., Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems, West Publishing Co., 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5- Hashemi R. R., Le Blanc L, Rucks C., Sheary A., A neural Network for Transportation Safety Modeling, International Journal of Expert Systems With Applications to appear, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6- Hashemi R. R., Talburt J. R., Velusamy M., A Neural Network as a Quality Control Monitor of an Intelligent System, Proceedings of The 1995 International ACM Applied Computing Conference (SAC'95), Nashville, TN., 1995, pp 400- 407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7- Hashemi R. R., Chowdhury A., Stafford N., Talburt J., Prediction Capability of Neural Networks Trained in Monte-Carlo Paradigm, Proceedings of The 1993 International ACM Applied Computing Conference (SAC'93), 1993, pp. 9-13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8- Hashemi R. R., Stafford N., A Backpropogation Neural Network for Risk Assessment, Proceedings of The 1993 IEEE International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications (IEEE IPCCC-93), Scottsdale, AZ., 1993, pp. 565- 570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9- Fausett L., Fundamentals of Neural Networks: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications, Prentice Hall, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Identifying and testing of signatures for non-volatile biomolecules using tandem mass spectra

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader