skip to main content
10.1145/2157136.2157203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Group note-taking in a large lecture class

Published:29 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Large introductory-level classes provide a cost-efficient approach for universities to serve many students at once, but also present several challenges to learning (e.g., poor visual angles). In addition, more students with declared, undeclared, or undiagnosed learning disabilities are entering the college and university systems. In the spirit of universal design, we created a group note-taking system in our large introductory computer science course to increase interaction amongst students, promote good note-taking strategies, and provide study resources to all students while also fulfilling the role of accommodating for students with learning disabilities. We show that the section of the course taught with our intervention performed significantly better on their final examination compared to a course taught without the intervention. We report that students enjoyed increased interactions with their peers, and that one third of the class self-reported an increase in their note-taking skills. Furthermore, our intervention only required minimal cost to the institution, and no financial cost to students, and is easily implemented in any size class.

References

  1. Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Davis, K.M., Linnell, N., Prince, C. and Razmov, V., Supporting active learning and examples based instruction with classroom technology. in SIGCSE '07, (2007), ACM Press, 69--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bernstein, M.S., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Harry, D., Andre, P. and Vargas, G,. 4chan and /b/: an analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. AAAI Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved August 1, 2011 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2873Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyle, J.R. and Weishaar, M. The effects of strategic notetaking on the recall and comprehension of lecture information for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16 (3). 133--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgstahler, S. and Cory, R. Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press, Boston, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldwell, J.E. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Ed, 6 (1). 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavender, A.C., Richard, R.E. and Rother, R.I., The summer academy for advancing deaf and hard of hearing in computing. In SIGCSE '10, ACM Press, 514--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3 (7). 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gehringer, E.F. and Miller, C.S., Student-generated active-learning exercises. in SIGCSE '09, ACM Press, 81--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K. and Turoff, M. Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communications Research, 13 (2). 225--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hughes, C.A. and Suritsky, S.K. Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disability, 27 (1). 20--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Johnson, J. and Strange, M. Why rural matters 2009: State and regional challenges and opportunities, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. National Council on Disability. People with Disabilities and Postsecondary Education, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. National Science Foundation. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (04--31), National Science Foundation, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Office of Institutional Research. The University of Georgia Common Data Set, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Office of Institutional Research. The University of Georgia Fact Book, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Saski, J., Swicegood, P. and Carter, J. Notetaking formats for learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6 (3). 265--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, London, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Snyder, T.D. and Dillow, S.A. Digest of Education Statistics 2010 (NCES 2011-015). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education., Washington, D.C., 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. The Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Retrieved August 1, 2011 from http://www.catea.gatech.edu/scitrainU/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tinto, V. Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68 (6). 599--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Weaver, R.R. and Qi, J. Classroom organization and participation: College students' perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 76 (5). 570--601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wilson, M.E. Teaching, learning, and the millennial students. New Directions for Student Services, 1004 (106). 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Group note-taking in a large lecture class

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education
          February 2012
          734 pages
          ISBN:9781450310987
          DOI:10.1145/2157136

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 February 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGCSE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate100of289submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader