skip to main content
10.1145/2093698.2093879acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisabelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do the generalized correlation methods improve time delay estimation of the muscle fiber conduction velocity?

Published:26 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Muscle fiber conduction velocity is generally measured by the estimation of the time delay between electromyography recording channels. In the present paper, we propose to identify the best estimator of a constant time delay among those based on generalized correlation methods. To this end, small observation windows are considered and the fractional part of time delay was calculated using a parabolic interpolation. The results show that only Eckart and Hannan-Thomson approaches outperform the basic cross-correlation method when the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is up to 0 dB and the observation duration is 250 ms. This study will be a background for further extension to time-varying delay estimation.

References

  1. Azaria, M, Hertz, D. 1984. Time delay estimation by generalized cross correlation methods, IEEE Transactions on ASSP, vol. 32, no. 2, 280--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brossier, J.-M. 1995. Adaptive phase estimation in non-Gaussian noise, Signal Processing, vol. 43, 245--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Farina, D., and Merletti, R. 2004. Estimation of average muscle fibre conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 134, 199--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Farina, D., Pozzo, M., Merlo, E., Bottin, A. and Merletti, R. 2004. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions. IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gerdle, B., Ostlund, N., Grönlund, C., Roeleveld, K. and Karlsson, J. 2008. Firing rate and conduction velocity of single motor units in the trapezius muscle in fibromyalgia patients and healthy controls, J Electromyogr Kinesiol, vol. 18, 707--716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hertz, D. 1986. Time delay estimation by combining efficient algorithms and generalized cross-correlation methods, IEEE Transactions On Acoustics, Speech, And Signal Processing, vol. Assp-34, no. 1,1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Knapp, C. and Carter, G. 1976. The generalized Correlation Method for Estimation of Time Delay, IEEE Trans. On ASSP, vol. 24, No. 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Leclerc, F., Ravier, P., Buttelli, O. and Jouanin, J.-C. 2007. Comparison of three time-varying delay estimators with application to electromyography, Proceedings of EUSIPCO, Poznan, 2499--2503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leclerc, F., Ravier, P., Farina, D., Jouanin, J.-C., and Buttelli, O. 2008. Time-varying delay estimation with application to electromyography, Proceedings of EUSIPCO, Lausanne.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Merletti, R., and Conte, L. 1997. Surface EMG signal processing during isometric contractions, J Electromyogr Kinesiol, vol. 7, 241--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sadoyama, T., Masuda, T., Miyata H. and Katsuta, S. 1988. Fibre conduction velocity and fibre composition in human vastus lateralis, Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, vol. 57, no. 6, 767--771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Do the generalized correlation methods improve time delay estimation of the muscle fiber conduction velocity?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ISABEL '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies
            October 2011
            949 pages
            ISBN:9781450309134
            DOI:10.1145/2093698

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 October 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader