skip to main content
10.1145/2090236.2090237acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

High-confidence predictions under adversarial uncertainty

Published:08 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the setting in which the bits of an unknown infinite binary sequence x are revealed sequentially to an observer. We show that very limited assumptions about x allow one to make successful predictions about unseen bits of x. First, we study the problem of successfully predicting a single 0 from among the bits of x. In our model we have only one chance to make a prediction, but may do so at a time of our choosing. This model is applicable to a variety of situations in which we want to perform an action of fixed duration, and need to predict a "safe" time-interval to perform it.

Letting Nt denote the number of 1s among the first t bits of x, we say that x is "ε-weakly sparse" if liminf (Nt/t) ≤ ε. Our main result is a randomized algorithm that, given any ε-weakly sparse sequence x, predicts a 0 of x with success probability as close as desired to 1 -- ε. Thus we can perform this task with essentially the same success probability as under the much stronger assumption that each bit of x takes the value 1 independently with probability ε.

We apply this result to show how to successfully predict a bit (0 or 1) under a broad class of possible assumptions on the sequence x. The assumptions are stated in terms of the behavior of a finite automaton M reading the bits of x. We also propose and solve a variant of the well-studied "ignorant forecasting" problem. For every ε > 0, we give a randomized forecasting algorithm Sε that, given sequential access to a binary sequence x, makes a prediction of the form: "A p fraction of the next N bits will be 1s." (The algorithm gets to choose p, N, and the time of the prediction.) For any fixed sequence x, the forecast fraction p is accurate to within ±ε with probability 1 − ε.

References

  1. K. B. Athreya, J. M. Hitchcock, J. H. Lutz, and E. Mayordomo. Effective strong dimension in algorithmic information and computational complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(3):671--705, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Billingsley. Ergodic Theory and Information. John Wiley and Sons, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C.-L. Chang and Y.-D. Lyuu. Efficient testing of forecasts. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 21(1):61--72, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Dawid. The well-calibrated Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(379):605--610, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Eggleston. The fractional dimension of a set defined by decimal properties. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 20:31--36, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. L. Fortnow and R. V. Vohra. The complexity of forecast testing. Econometrica, 77:93--105, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. P. Foster and R. V. Vohra. Asymptotic calibration. Biometrika, 85(2):379--390, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L. A. Hemaspaandra. Sigact news complexity theory column 48. SIGACT News, 36(3):24--38, 2005. Guest Column: The Fractal Geometry of Complexity Classes, by J. M. Hitchcock, J. H. Lutz, and E. Mayordomo. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. H. Lutz. Dimension in complexity classes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(5):1236--1259, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. H. Lutz. The dimensions of individual strings and sequences. Information and Computation, 187(1):49--79, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Merhav and M. Feder. Universal prediction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44(6):2124--2147, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Sandroni. The reproducible properties of correct forecasts. International Journal of Game Theory, 32(1):151--159, December 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. High-confidence predictions under adversarial uncertainty

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITCS '12: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
      January 2012
      516 pages
      ISBN:9781450311151
      DOI:10.1145/2090236

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 January 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITCS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate39of93submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate172of513submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader