skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A partitioning method for symbolic interval data based on kernelized metric

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

To solve the problem of situations with nonlinearly separable clusters, kernel clustering methods have been proposed. Symbolic Data Analysis (SDA) has emerged to deal with variables that can have intervals, histograms, and even functions as values, in order to consider the variability and/or uncertainty innate to the data. In this paper, we present a K-means clustering method based in kernelized squared L2 distance for symbolic interval-type data. Experiments with real and syntectic symbolic interval-type data sets are considered.

References

  1. F. D. Carvalho, P. Brito, and H. Bock. Dynamic clustering for interval data based on l2 distance. Computational Statistics, 21(2):231--250, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I. S. Dhillon, Y. Guan, and B. Kulis. Kernel k-means, spectral clustering and normalized cuts. ACMSIGKDD Int'l Conf Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 551--556, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Diday and M. Noirhomme-Fraiture. Symbolic Data Analysis And The Sodas Software. Wiley-Interscience Publishers, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiely and Sons, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Filippone, F. Camastra, F.Masulli, and S. Rovetta. A survey of kernel and spectral methods for clustering. Pattern Recognition, 41:176--190, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Guru, B. Kiranagi, and P. Nagabhushan. Multivalued type dissimilarity measure and concept of mutual dissimilarity value for clustering symbolic patterns. Pattern Recognition, pages 1203--1213, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Hubert and A. P. Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2:193--218, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty, and P. J. Flynn. Data clustering: a review. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(3):264--323, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Wood and F. Stevens. Agaricus. http://www.mykoweb.com/ CAF/genera/Agaricus.html, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Q. Zhang and S. C. Chen. Kernel-based fuzzy and possibilistic c-means clustering. In Proceedings of the International Conference Artificial Neural Network, pages 122--125, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A partitioning method for symbolic interval data based on kernelized metric

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
      October 2011
      2712 pages
      ISBN:9781450307178
      DOI:10.1145/2063576

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader