skip to main content
10.1145/2018556.2018561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The impact of negative game reviews and user comments on player experience

Published:10 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Game reviews and player ratings have an effect on the commercial success of games. They are used extensively by game developers to gauge the success of their titles and by potential buyers to make more informed purchase decisions. However, their potential influence on player experience remains uncertain. We investigated how game reviews and user comments influence players' affective states and experiences during game play. We found that both professional reviews and user comments (especially the negative comments) affected experience measured through game ratings, and that this effect was not mediated by changes in players' moods. Our results are important to the game industry because of the meaningful negative effect that user and critic comments can have on individual player experience and the resulting commercial success of a game.

References

  1. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., and Vohs, K. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5, 4, 323--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chaiken, S., and Maheswaran, D. 1994. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 3 (mar), 460--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chaiken, S. 2003. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. In Social Psychology:A General Reader. Psychology Press, 461--473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiske, S. 1980. Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 6, 889--906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Huck, S. W., and Cormier, W. H. 1996. Reading statistics and research. New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ivory, J. D. 2006. Still a man's game: Gender representation in online reviews of video games. Mass Communicationn & Society 9, 1, 103--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jenkins, R., Lee, M., Archambault, R., Shane, H., and Greg, S. 2010. The influence of professional critic reviews. EEDAR/SMU behavioral study. Tech. rep., Southern Methodist University, Guildhall. Electronic Entertainment Design and Research, jul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lang, P., Sidowski, J., Johnson, J., and Williams, T. 1980. Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems. Ablex Pub. Corp., Norwood, NJ, 119--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsen, J. M. 2008. Evaluating user experience - how game reviewers do it. In Evaluating User Experiences in Games, Workshop CHI'08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Livingston, I. J., Mandryk, R. L., and Stanley, K. G. 2010. Critic-proofing: How using critic reviews and game genres can refine heuristic evaluations. In Proceedings of FuturePlay 2010, ACM, 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mandryk, R. L. 2008. Physiological measures for game evaluation. In Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., and Booth, R. J., 2011. LIWC. Retrieved January 2, 2011, from http://www.liwc.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Prato, F., and John, O. 1991. Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 3, 380--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Reinstein, D. A., and Snyder, C. M. 2005. The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. The journal of industrial economics 53, 1, 27--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sundar, S. S., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and Hastall, M. R. 2007. News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 3, 366--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., and Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. 2009. Authority vs. peer: how interface cues influence users. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 4231--4236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sundar, S. S. 2007. The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, 73--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 4754, 1124--1131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yi, Y. 1990. Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising 19, 2, 40--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zagal, J. P., Ladd, A., and Johnson, T. 2009. Characterizing and understanding game reviews. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, ACM, Orlando, Florida, ACM, 215--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of negative game reviews and user comments on player experience

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              Sandbox '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games
              August 2011
              56 pages
              ISBN:9781450307758
              DOI:10.1145/2018556

              Copyright © 2011 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 10 August 2011

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Upcoming Conference

              SIGGRAPH '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader