skip to main content
10.1145/1891903.1891907acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feedback is... late: measuring multimodal delays in mobile device touchscreen interaction

Published:08 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multimodal interaction is becoming common in many kinds of devices, particularly mobile phones. If care is not taken in design and implementation, there may be latencies in the timing of feedback in the different modalities may have unintended effects on users. This paper introduces an easy to implement multimodal latency measurement tool for touchscreen interaction. It uses off-the-shelf components and free software and is capable of measuring latencies accurately between different interaction events in different modalities. The tool uses a high-speed camera, a mirror, a microphone and an accelerometer to measure the touch, visual, audio and tactile feedback events that occur in touchscreen interaction. The microphone and the accelerometer are both interfaced with a standard PC soundcard that makes the measurement and analysis simple. The latencies are obtained by hand and eye using a slow-motion video player and an audio editor. To validate the tool, we measured four commercial mobile phones. Our results show that there are significant differences in latencies, not only between the devices, but also between different applications and modalities within one device. In this paper the focus is on mobile touchscreen devices, but with minor modifications our tool could be also used in other domains.

References

  1. Mine, M. R., Characterization of End-to-End Delays in Head-Mounted Display Systems. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. He, D., Liu, F., Pape, D., Dawe, G. and Sandin, D., Video-Based Measurement of System Latency. In Proceedings of the IPT2000, International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop (Ames IA, USA, 2000) (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Miller, D. and Bishop, G., Latency meter: a device for easily monitoring VE delay. In Proceedings of the Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems IX (San Jose, CA, USA, 2002) (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wright, M., Cassidy, R. J. and Zbyszynski, M. F., Audio and Gesture Latency Measurements on Linux and OSX. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (Miami, FL, USA, 2004) (2004), 423--429.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lehtosalo, A., Haptics Technologies and Electromechanical Latency Measurements in Tactile Feedback System. Master's Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Levitin, D. J., MacLean, K., Mathews, M. and Chu, L., The Perception of Cross-Modal Simultaneity. Invited paper. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems (Liège, Belgium., 1999) (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adelstein, B. D., Begault, D. R., Anderson, M. R. and Wenzel, E. M., Sensitivity to haptic-audio asynchrony. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (Vancouver, Canada, 2003). ACM (2003), 73--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Liang, J., Shaw, C. and Green, M., On Temporal-Spatial Realism in the Virtual Reality Environment. In Proceedings of the UIST'91, Symposium of User Interface Software and Technology (Hilton Head, South Carolina, US, 1991) (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Freed, A., Chaudhary, A. and Davila, B., Operating Systems Latency Measurement and Analysis for Sound Synthesis and Processing Applications. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (Thessaloniki, Creece, 1997). ICMA (International Computer Music Association) (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MacMillan, K., Droettboom, M. and Fujinaga, I., Audio Latency Measurements of Desktop Operating Systems. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (Habana, Cuba, 2001). ICMA (International Computer Music Association) (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson, M. and Thom, B., Interactive MIDI: Real-time Performance Evaluation. In Proceedings of the New Interfaces for Musical Expression (Hamamatsu, Japan, 2004) (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Feedback is... late: measuring multimodal delays in mobile device touchscreen interaction

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ICMI-MLMI '10: International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction
              November 2010
              311 pages
              ISBN:9781450304146
              DOI:10.1145/1891903

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 November 2010

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              ICMI-MLMI '10 Paper Acceptance Rate41of100submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader