skip to main content
10.1145/1872007.1872010acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A folded pipeline network processor architecture for 100 Gbit/s networks

Published:25 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ethernet, although initially conceived as a Local Area Network technology, has been steadily making inroads into access and core networks. This has led to a need for higher link speeds, which are now reaching 100 Gbit/s. Packet processing at this rate represents a significant challenge, that needs to be met efficiently, while minimizing power consumption and chip area. This level of throughput favours a pipelined approach, thus this paper takes a traditional pipeline and breaks it down to mini-pipelines, which can perform coarse-grained processing (like process an MPLS label to completion). These mini-pipelines are then parellelized and used to construct a folded pipeline architecture, which augments the traditional approach by significantly reducing power consumption, a key problem in future routers. The paper compares the two approaches, discusses their advantages and disadvantages and demonstrates by quantitative measures that the folded pipeline architecture is the better solution for 100 Gbit/s processing.

References

  1. Ieee standard for local and metropolitan area networks---virtual bridged local area networks - amendment: Provider backbone bridge traffic engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Netronome nfp-3200 network processor - http://www.netronome.com/files/file/netronome0).pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xelerated AB. Hx network processor family, http://www.xelerated.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. Rfc2475 - an architecture for differentiated services, December 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Bocci, S. Bryant, and L. Levrau. A framework for mpls in transport networks, November 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Bocci, M. Vigoureux, and S. Bryant. Rfc5586 - mpls generic associated channel, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Broder and M. Mitzenmacher. Using multiple hash functions to improve ip lookups. In INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, volume 3, pages 1454--1463 vol. 3, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. EZ Chip. Np-4 network processor family, http://www.ezchip.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Fedyk and D. Allan. Ethernet data plane evolution for provider networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46:84--89, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Hauger, A. Mutter, A. Kirstaedter, T. Wild, K. Karras, R. Ohlendorf, F. Feller, and J. Scharf. Packet processing at 100 gbps and beyond - challenges and perspectives. In 10. ITG-Fachtagung Photonische Netze, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CSwitch Inc. Cs90 configurable switch array family, http:/www.cswitch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Kirstadter, C. Gruber, J. Riedl, and T. Bauschert. Carrier-grade ethernet for packet core networks. volume 6354, page 635414. SPIE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ian Kuon and Jonathan Rose. Measuring the gap between fpgas and asics. In FPGA '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/SIGDA 14th international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays, pages 21--30, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Niven-Jenkins, D. Brungard, M. Betts, N. Sprecher, and S. Ueno. Mpls-tp requirements, April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohammad Peyravian and Jean Calvignac. Fundamental architectural considerations for network processors. Comput. Netw., 41(5):587--600, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon. Rfc3031 - multiprotocol label switching architecture, January 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Haoyu Song, Sarang Dharmapurikar, Jonathan Turner, and John Lockwood. Fast hash table lookup using extended bloom filter: an aid to network processing. In SIGCOMM '05: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, pages 181--192, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ning Weng and Tilman Wolf. Pipelining vs. multiprocessors - choosing the right network processor system topology. In in Proc. of Advanced Networking and Communications Hardware Workshop (ANCHOR 2004) in conjunction with The 31st Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA 2004, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ANCS '10: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems
    October 2010
    244 pages
    ISBN:9781450303798
    DOI:10.1145/1872007

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 October 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate88of314submissions,28%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader