ABSTRACT
We study strategic games in the tradition of cooperative game theory, where players may make binding agreements that involve side payments. We use a decomposition of strategic games into competitive and cooperative components to define and axiomatize a solution that unifies earlier solutions and generalizes to the case of incomplete information. In the latter case, we give incentive compatible mechanisms that achieve first-best efficiency.
- Nash, J.F. 1953. "Two-person cooperative games," Econometrica 21, 128-140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raiffa, H. 1953. "Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games," Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Kuhn, H., and A.W. Tucker, editors, 361-387.Google Scholar
- Selten, R. 1960. "Bewertung Strategischer Spiele," Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 116. Band, 2. Heft, 221-282.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Cooperation and competition in strategic games with private information
Recommendations
Majority bargaining for resource division
We address the problem of how a set of agents can decide to share a resource, represented as a unit-sized pie. The pie can be generated by the entire set but also by some of its subsets. We investigate a finite horizon non-cooperative bargaining game, ...
Two Game Models for Cooperation with Implicit Noncooperation
We propose two flexible game models to represent and analyze cases that cannot be modeled by current game models. One is called sharing creditability game (SCG) and the other is called bottomline game (BLG). The new models transform cooperative games ...
Selling Procedures with Private Information and Common Values
<P>The seller posted-price procedure is probably the most common method for making transactions in modern economies. We analyze the performance of posted pricing for transactions having significant common-value elements. In a model of two-sided private ...
Comments