skip to main content
10.1145/158011.158120acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Management of information technology innovation: a heuristic contingency paradigm research perspective

Published:01 June 1993Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a contingency model which causally relates information technology acquisition and diffusion (IT/AD) to organization culture (heterogeneous versus homogeneous), organization learning (innovative versus adaptive), and knowledge sharing (networked versus hierarchical). The model integrates multiple and well-grounded theoretical streams of research.

These three primary driving forces interact in a recursive dynamic, expressed in both rational driving forces and political driving forces. This paper focuses on the political driving forces, operationalizing them with five categories of measurement variables.

A preliminary set of research propositions associated with the five categories of political driving forces are presented. Future research is suggested, addressing moderating variables, and information technology acquisition and diffusion patterns of S-curves.

References

  1. Alexander, J. A. (1991). Adaptive change in corporate control practices. Academy of Manaaement Journal, 34(1), 162-193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, L., Cash, J., & Mills, D. (1988). Information technology and tomorrow's manager. Harvard Business Review, 66, 128-136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris, C. (1976). Organizational learnina and effective manaaement information systems: A prospectus for research (Working paper 76-4). Cambridge: Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. & Schoen, D.A. (1978). Organization !earninfl: A theory of action research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Argyris, C. & Schoen, D. A. (1982). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackman, A.W. (1974). The market dynamics of technological substitutions. Technoloqical Forecasting and Social Chanqe, 6, 41-63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bolton, M. (1988). Organizational miming: When do late adopters of organizational innovations outperform pioneers? Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Boynton, A.C. & Zmud, R.W. (1987). information technology planning in the 1990s: Directions for practice and research. MIS Quarterly, 11(1), 59-72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brancheau, J.C. & Wetherbe, J.C. (1989). End-user computing and knowledge work: Managing the introduction of new information technology. CIO Journal, Spring.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Child, J. (1987). Information technology, organization and response to strategic challenge. California Manaclement Review, 30, 33-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cooper, R.B. & Zmud, R.W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Manaaement Science, 36(2), 123-139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cosier, R.A. & Schwink, C.R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor management decisions. Academy of Manaaement Executive, 4(1), 69-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, Jr., T. & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity' implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Manaqement Executive, 5(3), 45-56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Culnan, M.J. & Markus, L. (1987). Information technologies: Electronic media and intraorganizational communication. In Jablin, F.M., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K.H. & Porter, LW. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Communication, Beverly Hills, CA, (pp. 420-222).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daft, R.L & Becker, S.W. (1978) The innovative _oroanization. New York: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1984) The nature and use of formal control systems for management control and strategy implementation. Journal of Manaqement, 1__0, 43 -66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness, and stuctural design. Manaaement Science, 3._22, 554-571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daft, R.L. & Macintosh, N.B. (1981). A tentative exploration of the amount and equivocality of information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2_66, 207-224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Manaaement Review, 9(2), 284-295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., & Trevino, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 1_1(3), 355-368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Manaqeme__nt, 1:3, 675- 688.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 3._44(3), 555-59O.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Delehanty, T., Sullo, P., & Wallace, W.A. (1982). A method for prescriptive assessment of {he flow of information within organizations. Manaqement Science, 2._88 (8), 910-924.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. DeLisi, P.S. (1990). Lessons from the steel axe: Culture, technology, and organizational change. Sloan M an. agemen.t Review, 3..22, 83-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Demski, J. & Fletham, G. (1978). Economic incentives in budgetary control systems. Acc0~u..0ting Review, 5;3, 336-359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Denison, D.R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dixon, P.J. & John, D.A. (1989). Technology issues facing corporate management in the 1990s. MIS Quarterly, 1_33(3), 247-255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Drucker, P.F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 6_66, 45-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Duncan, W.J. (1989). Organizational culture: 'Getting a fix' on an elusive concept. Academy of Manaqement Executive, 3(3), 229-236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ein-Dor, P. & Segev, E. (1982). Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 255-268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Manaqement Science, 3_!(2), 134-149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Manaaement Review, 14(1 ), 57-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Evans, M.G. (1984). Reducing control loss in organizations: The implications of dual hierarchies, mentoring and strengthening vertical dyadic linkages. Manaqement Science, 30(2), 156-168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy. of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer, W.A. (1980). Scientific and technical information and the performance of R&D groups, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 1,5, 67-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Frand, J. L. & Britt, J. A. (1991). Eighth Annual UCLA Survey of Business School Computer Usage. Los Angeles: The John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Galbraith, J. (1973) Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Galbraith, j. (1974) Organizational design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 23-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Galbraith, J.R. (1977). O~ganizational desian. Reading, MA' Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Glazer, R.H. & Montgomery, D.B. (1980). New products and innovations: An annotated bibliography (Technical Report 65). Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Gordon, G.G. (1991). Industry determinants of organizational culture. Academy of Manaqement Review, 1__66(2), 396-415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Green, S.G. & Welsh, M.A. (1988). Cybernetics and dependence: Refraining the control concept. Academy of Manaaement Review, 1_33(2), 287-301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Gresov, C. (1984). Designing organizations to innovate and implement: Using two dilemmas to create a solution. Columbia Journal of World Busines_.s, 1_99, 63-67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Gupta, A.K. & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Manaaement Review, 16(4), 768-792.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Gurbaxani, V. & Mendelson, H. (1990). An integrated model of information systems spending growth. Information Systems Research, 1(1), 23-46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Huber, G. (1982). Organizational information systems: Determinants of their performance and behavior. Manaqement Science, 28(2), 138-155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Huber, G. (1984). The nature and design of post industrial organizations. Manaqement Scien_c_e, 30(8), 928-951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. The Academy of Management Review, 1.55(1), 47-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Huber, G. (1991, December). We can do better: Integrating theories of novel organizations, new organizational forms, and information technology (a tutorial). Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Huber, G.P. & McDaniel, R.R. (1986). The decisionmaking paradigm of organizational design. Manaqement Science, 32(5), 572-589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Huff, S.L. & Munro, M.C. (1985). Information technology assessment and adoption' A field study. MIS Quarterly, 10(4), 327-339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jelinek, M. (1979). Institutionalizing innovation. New York: Praeger.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Johnston, H.R. & Carrico, S.R. (1988). Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 37-50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Johnston, H.R. & Vitale, M.R. (1988). Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Quarterly, 1_22(2), 153-166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Kerr, J. & Slocum, J.W., Jr. (1987). Managing corporate culture through reward system. Academy of Management Executive, 1(2), 99-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. & Miller, D. (1986). Personality, culture, and organization. The Academy of Management Review., 1__1(2), 266-279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Klempa, M. J. (in press). Managing information technology: An integrative acquisition/diffusion contingency model, in M. Khosrowpour (Ed.) Information technology a n_d _o. r ganizations: Challenges of New Technoloqies. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Kling, R. (1980). Social analysis of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ComputingSurveys, 1._22, 61-110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Kling, R. & Scacchi, W. (1982). The web of computing: Computer technology as a social organization. Advanced Computing, 21, 1-90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentorina at work: Developmentall relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Kram, K. E. & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Alternatives to mentoring: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Manaaement Journal, 2._88(1 ), 110-132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Kusekoski, G. (1989). Corporate videotex: A strategic business information system. MIS Quarterly, 13(4), 447-456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Kydd, C.T. (1989). Understanding the information content in MIS management tools. MIS Quarterly, 1:3(3), 277-290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Lackman, C. L. (1977). Gompertz curve forecasting: A new product application. Journal of Marketinq Research Society, 20(1), 45-47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Leifer, R. (1988). Matching computer-based information systems with organizational structures. MIS Quarterly, 1_22(1), 63-47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Levsen, V.B. & Fry, L.W. (1987, April). Computer-based information systems' Implications for organizational design." Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Academy of Management, Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Lucas, H. C. & Sutton, J. A. (1977). The stage hypothesis S-curve: Some contradictory evidence. Communications of the ACM, 20, 254-259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Mahajan, V. & Muller, E. (1979). Innovation diffusion and new-product growth models in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 4..33, 55-68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Makridakis, S. & Wheelwright, S. C. (1983). Forecastinq' Methods and applications. New York: Wiley/Hamilton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Maletz, M.C. (1990). KBS circles: A technology transfer initiative that leverages Xerox's leadership through quality program. MIS Quarterly, 1_44(3), 323-329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Markus, M.L. & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change' Causal structure in theory research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Mason, R.O. (1984). Current research issues. In F. Wo McFarlan (Ed.), The information systems research challenae: Proceedinas. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (pp. 279-304).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Mason, R.O. & Mitroff, I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. McFarlan, F.W. (Ed.). (1984). The information systems research challenqe: Proceedinas. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Meyer, A. D. & Goes, j. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management.Journal, 3_!.1(4), 897- 923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Mohrman, A.M. & Lawler, E.E. (1984). A review of theory and research. In F. W. McFarlan (Ed.) Th__.ee information svstems research challenae: Proceedinqs. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (pp. 135-164).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends. New York: Warner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Nelson, D.L. (1990). Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: A critical review. MI._.SS Quarterly, 14(1), 79-98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Neumann, Y. & Neumann, E. (1992). Management strategy, president's cognitive style, and organizational growth/decline: A framework for understanding enrollment change in private colleges. (Working Paper). Carson, CA: California State University Dominguez Hills, School of Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Noe, R.A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Manaqement Review, 13(1), 65-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Orlikowski, W.J. & Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information SYstems Researchj 2(1), 1-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Orlikowski, W.j. & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143-169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Ouchi, W.G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2__22, 95-111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Ouchi, W.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanism. Management Science, 2,3(9), 833-848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Ouchi, W.G. (1981). Theory_ Z. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Pascale, R. & Athos, A. (1981). The art of !apanese management. New York: Warner Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Peters, T.J. & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Raho, LE., Belohlav, J.A., & Fiedler, K.D. (1987). Assimilating new technology into the organization: An assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's model. MIS Quarterly, 11(1), 47-58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Rice, R.E. & Associates (1984). The new media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Rice, R.E. & Blair, J.H. (1984). New organizational media and productivity. In Rice, R.E. & Associates (Eds), ,Th..e New Media, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Richardson, G.L., Jackson, B.M., & Dickson, G.W. (1990). A principles-based architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprises. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 385-403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Rockart, J.F. & Short, J.E. (1989). I/T in the 1990s: Managing organization interdependence. Sloan Management Review, 30, 7-17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Rogers, E.M., Williams, L., & West, R.B. (1977). Bibliography of the diffusion of innovations. Stanford, CA: Institute for Communications Research, Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Saffold, G. S., 111. (1988). Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: Moving beyond "strong" culture. The Academy of Manaqement Review, 13(4), 546-558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Schein, E.H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Manaqement Review, 2,5, 3-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Schoderbek, C.G., Schoderbek, P.P., & Kefalas, A.G. (1975). Manaqement systems. Dallas: Business Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Schon, D. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York' Norton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Manaqement Journal, 32_(4), 745-772.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Shaw, J.B., Fisher, C.D., & Randolph, W.A. (1991). From materialism to accountability: The changing cultures of Ma Bell and Mother Russia. Academy of Manaqement Review, 5(1), 7-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Shrivastava, P. (1985). Integrating strategy formulation with organizational culture. Journal of Business Strategy, 5_, 103-111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Simon, H.A. (1990). Information technologies and organizations. The Accounting Review, 6.5(3), 658-667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Sitkin, S. B. & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Manaqement Review, 17(1), 9-38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Sproull, C.W. & Keisler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Manaqement Science, 3._22, 1492-1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Morrow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Tushman, M.L. (1978). Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Manaqement Journal, 2_!, 624-645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Tushman, M.L. & Nadler, D.A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Manaqement Review, 3, 613-624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Van de Ven, A. (1982). Strategic management concerns among CEOs: A preliminary research agenda. Paper presented at the Strategic Management Colloqium, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Manaqement Science, 3_22 (5), 590-607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Walsh, J.P. & Ungson, G.R. (1991). Organizational memory. The Academy of Manaqement Review, 16(1), 57-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Watson, R.T. (1990). Influences on the IS manager's perceptions: Information scanning and the relationship with the CEO. MIS Quarterly, 14(2), 217-231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Weick, K.E. (1984). Theoretical assumptions and research methodology. In F. W. McFarlan, (Ed.) The information systems research chailenae: Proceedings. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (pp. 111-132).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Weick, K.E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. In Staw, B.M. (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT, (pp. 41-74).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Weiil, P. & Olson, M.H. (1989). Managing investment in information technology: Mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 3-17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Wilson, J.A. & Elman, N. (1990). Organizational benefits of mentoring. Academy of Mana.qement Executive, 4(4), 88-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Yates, J. (1990). For the record: The embodiment of organizational memory, 1850-1920. Business and Economic History (2nd Series)., 1__99, 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication' A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academv of Manaaement Review, 17(2), 299-326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and oraanizations. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Zenger, T. (1988). Agency sorting, agent solutions and diseconomies of scale: An empirical investigation of employment contracts in high technology R&D. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Zey, M.G. (1984). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Zmud, R.W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices' Influence of centralization and formalization. Manaqement Sc!ence, 2._8(12), 1421-1431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Zmud, R.W. (1984). Push-pull theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science, 30(6), 727-738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Management of information technology innovation: a heuristic contingency paradigm research perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCPR '93: Proceedings of the 1993 conference on Computer personnel research
        June 1993
        496 pages
        ISBN:0897915720
        DOI:10.1145/158011

        Copyright © 1993 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 June 1993

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader