skip to main content
10.1145/1499224.1499275acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Removing barriers to trust in distributed teams: understanding cultural differences and strengthening social ties

Published:20 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Geographically distributed software development teams face communication and collaboration challenges that otherwise do not occur when engineers are collocated. There has been extensive research on the topic of trust as it is imperative in a collaborative environment. This paper takes trust research to a new level by addressing two attributes of trust-building that distributed development teams encounter when working together. We describe how underlying differences in social and cultural norms affect a distributed development team's effectiveness. We present study data from interviews and observations with four software teams at Microsoft doing distributed development work that have team members located in Europe and the United States. Our study demonstrates that openly recognizing cultural differences and intentionally strengthening social ties among team members are criteria for building trust in distributed software teams and, if not addressed, will erode a distributed team's ability to communicate and effectively work together. We further articulate how social ties may influence collaboration in distributed teams. Finally, we provide examples of differences in social and cultural norms in distributed software teams and demonstrate how carefully cultivated personal relationships contribute to a distributed team's success and on-time performance.

References

  1. Hemphill, L. and Begel, A. Adopting Distributed Development: Case Studies in Onboarding a First Remote Team Member. ICSE (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Davidow, W.H. and Malone M.S. The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lipnak, J. and Stamps, J. Virtual Teams: Reaching across space, Time, and Organizations with Technology (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Staples, D. and Ratnasingham, P. Trust: The Panacea of Virtual Management (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kelly, S. and Farnham, S. Wallop: Designing a Prototype for Personal Expression and Sharing within Social Networks, in Proceedings of HICSS-37 (January 2004), IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marc A. Smith, "Invisible Crowds in Cyberspace: Mapping the Social Structure of the Usenet," Communities in Cyberspace: Perspectives on New Forms of Social Organization, Routledge Press, London, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory (1), 1983, pp. 201--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins, R. Foundations of Sociology (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Oshri, Kotlarsky, Willcocks. Building Critical Social Ties for Global Collaborative Teamwork (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, J. M. & Harkins, S. G. Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. The Arbinger Institute. Leadership and Self Deception: Getting Out of the Box (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Removing barriers to trust in distributed teams: understanding cultural differences and strengthening social ties

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IWIC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaboration
            February 2009
            342 pages
            ISBN:9781605585024
            DOI:10.1145/1499224

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 February 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate47of77submissions,61%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader