Dan Joyce
Renée McCauley
Abstract
Based on post-meeting review forms, most attendees of the SIGCSE Symposium and ITiCSE Conference greatly appreciate the programs put together by the respective program committees. In recent years, nevertheless, several SIGCSE members have communicated their concerns to the SIGCSE Board about the paper solicitation, submission, review, and selection process used for these meetings.
- Amruth Kumar, Patricia A. Joseph, Paul Wagner, and Michael Goldweber. It is Time to Review the SIGCSE Reviewing Process. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, page 591, Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 2007.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Report on improving SIGCSE/ITiCSE program creation process
Recommendations
SIGCSE speaker's fund program
Since 2005, the SIGCSE Speaker's Fund Program has funded presentations at in-cooperation conferences. Speakers from previous SIGCSE conferences, including the Symposium, ITiCSE, and ICER, can be invited by the organizers of non-ACM conferences that have ...
SIGCSE business meeting report
The annual business meeting of the SIGCSE Board was held on March 4, 2016. The SIGCSE Board Chair, Susan Rodger, introduced the SIGCSE Board members. Susan thanked past, present and future Chairs of the Symposium, ITiCSE, and ICER. She also thanked the ...
SIGCSE symposium 2018 report
We were delighted to co-chair the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education in Baltimore, Maryland from February 21-24, 2018, and we opened the conference with a CS riff of that iconic Hairspray song. This was the largest SIGCSE ...
Comments