skip to main content
editorial
Free Access

Technology transfer and modernization: what can philosophers of technology contribute?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 December 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Technique- or technology-transfer is based in many ways on technological and economic paths that were often created by European colonization and have been intensified by Industrialization and Globalization. On the one hand, the modern age is a constantly developing planetary truth, a truth that impacts every society in the world. On the other hand, societies in third world countries have not produced this condition themselves because modernity is an external imposition. This means the modern age turns to be an unavoidable destiny for them. Traditional modernization and technology transfer abstract from almost all contextual factors. That is why technological development and modernization are being compared across continents and assessed with more or less value, not considering the cultural and social contextual circumstances. This supposes on one hand that the western way into the modern age has a model character, is normative and there are no alternatives to it. Also, it is supposed that the modern age is a desirable objective and that compensation leads to equal final situations.

A requirement for technological standards and for technology transfer are innovations which constantly promise new development paths and stable institutional settings that can be monitored over a long period. These setting have to be ensured by the cultural system, especially by their social-economical dimensions. Also, the religious dimension is a part of this setting, and in Africa and South-east Asia is closely connected to the form and style of life and to culture. Secularization comparable to the western world only takes place in major cities, as they are islands of modernization. For thousands of years, technological process innovations such as technology transfer have been digested by cultural embedding and not through modernization. This might vary from place to place but in general it shows the same development. Heteronomous transfers meet culturally motivated resistance or are ignored, whereas the circumstances of technology transfer are a bit different. It is not being identified with culture transfer and does not automatically lead to a broad modernization but to a form of development with a speed of cultural adjustment - for sure slower than required by modernization. But this development can mostly be digested with the help of the embedding-paradigm. It is our task to generate forms of modernization with consideration for cultural embedding and traditions.

References

  1. Brackert, H., F. Wefelmeyer 1984: Naturplan und Verfallskritik. Zu Begriff und Geschichte der Kultur, Frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, E. 1994: (Hg). Technology transfer to developing countries; London New York Habermas, J. 1988: Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne; Frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ihde, D. 1993: Philosophy of Technology. An introduction; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Irrgang, B. 2000: Technological Development and social progress; in: Instituto del Filosofia Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile; Seminarios de Filosofia 12/13 (1999/2000), 41-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Irrgang, B. 2001: Technische Kultur. Instrumentelles Verstehen und technisches Handeln; (Philosophie der Technik Bd. 1) Paderborn {Technological Culture: Instrumental Understanding and Technological Action}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Irrgang, B. 2002a: Technische Praxis. Gestaltungsperspektiven technischer Entwicklung; (Philosophie der Technik Bd. 2) Paderborn {Technological Practice: Design Perspectives of Technological Development}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Irrgang, B. 2002b: Technischer Fortschritt. Legitimitätsprobleme innovativer Technik; (Philosophie der Technik Bd. 3) Paderborn {Technological Progress: Legitimacy Problems of Innovative Technology}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Irrgang, B. 2003a: Technologietransfer transkulturell als Bewegung technischer Kompetenz am Beispiel der spätmittelalterlichen Waffentechnologie; in: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Universität Dresden 52 (2003) Heft 5/6,91-95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Irrgang, Bernhard 2006: Technologietransfer transkulturell. Komparativ Hermeneutik von Technik in Europa, Indien und China; Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main {Transcultural Technology Transfer: Comparative Hermeneutics of Technology in Europe, India and China}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Irrgang, Bernhard 2007: Hermeneutische Ethik. Pragmatisch-ethische Orientierung in technologischen Gesellschaften; Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt {Hermeneutical Ethics: Pragmatical-ethical Orientation in Technological Societies}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lübbe, H. 1993: Globale Vereinheitlichung durch die Technik und die Vielfalt der Kulturen. Zur Kompensationstheorie der historischen Kulturwissenschaften; in: F. Rapp (Hg.): Neue Ethik der Technik. Philosophische Kontroversen; Wiesbaden, 15-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ogburn, W. 1969: Kultur und sozialer Wandel. Ausgewählte Schriften; ed. von O. D. Duncan; Neuwied, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sahlins, M. 1994: Kultur und praktische Vernunft; übersetzt von B. Luchisi (11976); Frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Young, R. 1995: Colonial desire. Hybridity in theory, culture and race; London, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Technology transfer and modernization: what can philosophers of technology contribute?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Ubiquity
          Ubiquity  Volume 2007, Issue December
          December 2007
          7 pages
          EISSN:1530-2180
          DOI:10.1145/1345073
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2007 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 December 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • editorial

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format