skip to main content
10.1145/1276958.1277159acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Methods for open-box analysis in artificial development

Published:07 July 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Even a developmental system with very simple building blocks can evolve significantly complex artifacts. Understandingsuch complexity poses a significant challenge. This paper shows how various investigative methods that are typically used in biology, can be transferred and used in an artificial development context. As an instance of evolved complexity, a self-repairing artifact is analyzed using the following methods: ablation of environmental features, chemical concentrations monitors, in silico subsystem simulations, gene knock-outs, and modeling of the gene regulatory map. A number of mechanisms governing size-regulation and self repair are uncovered, such as: subtle timing of gene activations, stable regulation based on attractor points, opportunistic use of the environment and information content replication.

References

  1. T. Andersen, R. Newman, and T. Otter. Development of virtual embryos with emergent self-repair. Technical Report FS-06-03, Developmental Systems; AAAI Fall Symposium, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. J. Bentley and S. Kumar. Three ways to grow designs: A comparison of embryogenies for an evolutionary design problem. In W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith, editors, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference -- GECCO--1999, pages 25--43. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Eggenberger. Evolving morphologies of simulated 3d organisms based on differential gene expression. In Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Federici. Evolving a neurocontroller through a process of embryogeny. In S. Schaal, A. Ijspeert, A. Billard, S. Vijayakumar, J. Hallam, and J. Meyer, editors, From Animals To Animats 8: SAB 2004, pages 373--384, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Grajdeanu and S. Kumar. A novel developmental system for the study of evolutionary design. Technical Report FS--06--03, Developmental Systems; AAAI Fall Symposium, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. S. Hornby. Generative Representations for Evolutionary Design Automation. PhD thesis, Brandeis University, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. T. Psujek and R. D. Beer. Phenotypic variability in canalized development systems. In Proceedings of ALIFE9, pages 415--420, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Roggen and D. Federici. Multi-cellular development: is there scalability and robustness to gain? In XYao and al. ed., editors, Proceedings of PPSN VIII}, pages 391--400, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Methods for open-box analysis in artificial development

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '07: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2007
          2313 pages
          ISBN:9781595936974
          DOI:10.1145/1276958

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 July 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '07 Paper Acceptance Rate266of577submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader