skip to main content
10.1145/1168987.1168993acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Developing steady clicks:: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments

Published:23 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Slipping while clicking and accidental clicks are a source of errors for mouse users with motor impairments. The Steady Clicks assistance feature suppresses these errors by freezing the cursor during mouse clicks, preventing overlapping button presses and suppressing clicks made while the mouse is moving at a high velocity. Evaluation with eleven target users found that Steady Clicks enabled participants to select targets using significantly fewer attempts. Overall task performance times were significantly improved for the five participants with the highest slip rates. Blocking of overlapping and high velocity clicks also shows promise as an error filter. Nine participants preferred Steady Clicks to the unassisted condition. If used in conjunction with existing techniques for cursor positioning, all of the major sources of clicking errors observed in empirical studies would be addressed, enabling faster and more effective mouse use for those who currently struggle with the standard mouse.

References

  1. Accot, J. and Zhai, S. (2002) More than dotting the i's - Foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In Proceedings of CHI 2002, Minnesota, USA, April 2002, pp 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blanch, R, Guiard, Y., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004) Semantic pointing: Improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In Proceedings of CHI '04, Vienna, Austria, pp 519--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brownlow, N., Shein, F., Thomas, D., Milner, M., and Parnes, P. (1989). Direct manipulation: Problems with pointing devices. In Resna '89: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference,. Washington DC: Resna Press, pp 246--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cockburn, A. and Firth, A., Improving the Acquisition of Small Targets. in People and Computers XVII (Proceedings of the 2003 British Computer Society Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction.), (Bath, England, 2003), 181--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grossman, T. and Balakrishnan, R. (2005) The bubble cursor: Enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's acivation area. In Proceedings of CHI '05, Portland, OR, USA, pp 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Keates, S., & Trewin, S. (2005). Effects of Age and Parkinson's Disease on Cursor Positioning Using a Mouse. In ASSETS '05 Proceedings of the Seventh International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. 68--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Keates, S., Trewin, S., & Paradise, J. (2005). Using Pointing Devices: Quantifying differences across user groups. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McGuffin and Balakrishnan (2002) Acquisition of expanding targets. Proceedings of CHI 2002, Minnesota, USA, pp 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paradise, J., Trewin, S., & Keates, S. (2005). Using Pointing Devices: Difficulties Encountered and Strategies Employed. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Riviere, C., and Thakor, N. (1996). Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: Accuracy and linearity. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 33, pp 6--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Trewin, S., and Pain, H. (1999). Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, pp 109--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, A., and Hudson, S. (1997) Making computers easier for older adults to use: Area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of CHI '97, Atlanta GA, pp 266--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Developing steady clicks:: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Assets '06: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
      October 2006
      316 pages
      ISBN:1595932909
      DOI:10.1145/1168987

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader