skip to main content
10.1145/1164717.1164742acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A decentralized location system for sensor networks using cooperative calibration and heuristics

Published:07 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study the problem of determining the location of nodes in a wireless sensor network, describing a fully decentralized algorithm called HECOPS, where every node estimates its own position after interacting with other nodes. Only a limited number of nodes have exact knowledge of their position coordinates. Any node can, however, be selected as a reference. We establish a ranking system to determine the reliability of each estimated position. This leads to a novel approach for position calculation that uses fewer but more reliable landmarks, thus reducing data communication and limiting error propagation. We present heuristics that are used to reduce the effects of measurement errors, including a scheme to calibrate range measurements by comparing, whenever possible, the estimated distance with the actual distance between a pair of nodes. Experiments demonstrate that the algorithm is superior to a previously proposed method in terms of its ability to compute correct coordinates under a wider variety of conditions and its robustness to measurement errors.

References

  1. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8):102--114, Aug. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Albowicz, A. Chen, and L. Zhang. Recursive position estimation in sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Network Protocols (ICNP'01), pages 35--41. IEEE Computer Society, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. S. Biagioni and K. W. Bridges. The application of remote sensor technology to assist the recovery of rare and endangered species. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 16(3):315--324, Fall 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Gps-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28--34, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Doherty, K. S. J. Pister, and L. E. Ghaoui. Convex optimization methods for sensor node position estimation. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 1655--1663, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, and S. Wicker. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Technical Report CSD-TR 02-0013, UCLA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. X. Ji and H. Zhaa. Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks with multidimensional scaling. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Lorincz and M. Welsh. Motetrack: A robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. In T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, editors, Location- and Context-Awareness: First International Workshop, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany. Proceedings, volume 3479 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 63--82. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Nasipuri and K. Li. A directionality based location discovery scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM Int. Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA'02), pages 105--111, New York, Sept. 28 2002. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. L. Nemeroff, L. Garcia, D. Hampel, and S. Di Pierro. Networked sensor communications for the objective force. In R. Suresh and W. E. Roper, editors, Proc. SPIE Vol. 4741, pages 29--35, Aug. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Niculescu and B. R. Badrinath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS). In Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf. (GLOBECOM), pages 2926--2931, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C. Savarese, K. Langendoen, and J. Rabaey. Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In USENIX Technical Annual Conference, pages 317--328, Monterey, CA, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Savarese, J. Rabaey, and J. Beutel. Locationing in distributed ad hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proc. 2001 Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2001), volume 4, pages 2037--2040. IEEE, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Savvides, C.-C. Han, and M. B. Srivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 166--179, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Savvides, H. Park, and M. B. Srivastava. The bits and flops of the n-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems. In Proc. ACM Int. Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA'02), pages 112--121, New York, Sept. 28 2002. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Whitehouse, C. Karlof, A. Woo, F. Jiang, and D. E. Culler. The effects of ranging noise on multihop localization: an empirical study. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), pages 73--80. IEEE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Wu, C. Wang, and N.-F. Tzeng. Novel self-configurable positioning technique for multihop wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 13(3):609--621, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A decentralized location system for sensor networks using cooperative calibration and heuristics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MSWiM '06: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
      October 2006
      406 pages
      ISBN:1595934774
      DOI:10.1145/1164717

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      MSWiM '06 Paper Acceptance Rate39of160submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader