skip to main content
10.1145/1076034.1076046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

User term feedback in interactive text-based image retrieval

Published:15 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

To alleviate the vocabulary problem, this paper investigates the role of user term feedback in interactive text-based image retrieval. Term feedback refers to the feedback from a user on specific terms regarding their relevance to a target image. Previous studies have indicated the effectiveness of term feedback in interactive text retrieval [14]. However, the term feedback has not shown to be effective in our experiments on text-based image retrieval. Our results indicate that, although term feedback has a positive effect by allowing users to identify more relevant terms, it also has a strong negative effect by providing more opportunities for users to specify irrelevant terms. To understand these different effects and their implications on the potential of term feedback, this paper further presents analysis of important factors that contribute to the utility of term feedback and discusses the outlook of term feedback in interactive text-based image retrieval.

References

  1. Anick, P. and Tipirneni, S. The Paraphrase Search Assistant: Terminological Feedback for Iterative Information Seeking. In Proceedings of SIGIR'99. Berkeley, CA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belkin, N.J. and Marchetti, P.G. Determining the functionality and features of an intelligent interface to an information retrieval system, In Proceedings of SIGIR'90, Brussels, Belgium, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Koenemann, J., Ng, K.B., and Park, S. Using Relevance Feedback and Ranking in Interactive Searching. In Proceedings of TREC4. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blei, D. and Jordan, M. Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR). 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Choi, Y. and Rasmussen, E. Search for Images: the Analysis of User's Queries for Image Retrieval in American History. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clough, P., Sanderson, M., and Reid, Norman. The Eurovision St Andrews Photographic Collection. http://ir.shef.ac.uk/imageclef2004/guide.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman, D. Towards Interactive Query Expansion. In Proceeding of SIGIR'88. 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. He, X., King, O., Ma, W.-Y., Li, M., and Zhang, H. J. Learning a semantic space from user's relevance feedback for image retrieval. IEEE Transaction on Curcuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(1):39--48, Jan. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hearst, M. Using Categories to Provide Context for Full-Text Retrieval Results. In Proceedings of RIAO'94. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Henniger, Scott and Nicholas, Belkin, Interface Issues and Interaction Strategies for Information Retrieval Systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in computing Systems Conference (CHI'96), ACM Press, New York, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hoi, C.-H and Lyu, M. R. A Novel Log-based Relevance Feedback Technique in Content-based Image Retrieval, Proc. of the 12th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jeon, J., Lavrenko, V., and Manmatha, R. Automatic Image Annotation and Retrieval using Cross-Media Relevance Models. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Keister, L. H. User types and queries: impact on image access systems. In Challenges in indexing electronic text and images (Fidel, R et al., eds). ASIS, 1994, 7--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koenemann, J. and Belkin, N. J. A Case for Interaction: a Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, p.205--212, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, Critish Columbia, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lafferty, J. and Zhai, C. X. Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In The 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lavrenko, V. and Croft, B. Relevance-based langauge models. In Proceeding of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lavrenko, V., Manmatha, R., and Jeon, J. A Model for Learning the Semantics of Pictures. In Proceedings of Advance in Neutral Information Processing. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, J. and Wang, J.Z. Automatic linguistic indexing of pictures by a statistical modeling approach. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003. 25(19): p. 1075--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. McDonald, S. and Tait, J. Search Strategies in Content-based Imaged Retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2003. Toronto, Canada, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Monay, F. and Gatica-Perez, D. On Image Auto-Annotation with Latent Space Models. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ponte, J. A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval, in Department of Computer Science, Univ. of Massachusetts at Amherst. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rui, Y., Huang, T. S., Ortega, M., and Mehrotra, S. Relevance Feedback: A Power Tool in Interactive Content-Based Image Retrieval, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Special Issue on Segmentation, Description, and Retrieval of Video Content, pp644--655, Vol 8, No. 5, Sept, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Santini, S. Exploring image databases context-based retrieval. Academic Press, San Diego USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Vendrig, J., Worring, M., and Smeulders, A. Filter Image Browsing: Interactive Image Retrieval by Using Database Overviews. Multimedial Tools and Applications, 15, 83--103. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User term feedback in interactive text-based image retrieval

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
          August 2005
          708 pages
          ISBN:1595930345
          DOI:10.1145/1076034

          Copyright © 2005 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 August 2005

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader